Dataset Information

Evaluation of molecular assays for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

ABSTRACT: The diagnostic sensitivities of the BD GeneOhm and Cepheid Xpert assays were compared using culture on log-serial dilutions of well-characterized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and non-MRSA strains and on nasal and groin swabs from patients with histories of MRSA carriage. The sensitivities of GeneOhm and Xpert were high at 10(3)-CFU/ml MRSA concentrations (92.3% and 96.3%, respectively) although decreased considerably (<35%) at a 1-log-lower concentration. Unexpectedly, both assays also detected select coagulase-negative staphylococci, which requires further evaluation.

SUBMITTER: Malhotra-Kumar S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3008470 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of molecular assays for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Malhotra-Kumar Surbhi S Van Heirstraeten Liesbet L Lee Andie A Abrahantes José Cortinas JC Lammens Christine C Vanhommerig Evelyn E Molenberghs Geert G Aerts Marc M Harbarth Stephan S Goossens Herman H

Journal of clinical microbiology 20101013 12

The diagnostic sensitivities of the BD GeneOhm and Cepheid Xpert assays were compared using culture on log-serial dilutions of well-characterized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and non-MRSA strains and on nasal and groin swabs from patients with histories of MRSA carriage. The sensitivities of GeneOhm and Xpert were high at 10(3)-CFU/ml MRSA concentrations (92.3% and 96.3%, respectively) although decreased considerably (<35%) at a 1-log-lower concentration. Unexpectedly, both ...[more]

PMID: 20943869

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rapid laboratory diagnosis is critical for treating, managing, and preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We evaluated and compared the potential for MRSA detection of five chromogenic media, Brilliance MRSA agar (Oxoid), ChromID (bioMérieux), MRSASelect (Bio-Rad), CHROMagar (CHROMagar Microbiology), and BBL-CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics). Media were tested with log serial dilutions (10(0) to 10(6) CFU) of pure isolates of MRSA (n = 60), non-MRSA (n = 27), and defined mixtures thereof simulating clinical samples (n = 84). Further evaluations were done on pre-enriched nasal and groin screening swabs (n = 213) from 165 hospitalized patients. Randomized samples were spiral plated on each medium and independently scored by five investigators for characteristic colonies at 24 and 48 h of incubation. Confirmatory testing of up to five putative MRSA colonies recovered from each medium was done. The cumulative average sensitivity with isolates, mixtures, and clinical samples was the highest for Brilliance MRSA agar (97%) and similar for the other four media (>or=92%). The cumulative average specificity was the highest for BBL-CHROMagar (99%), followed by MRSASelect (98%), CHROMagar (97%), ChromID (89%), and Brilliance MRSA agar (86%). All of the media detected MRSA at 10 and 1 CFU, although at these low loads, few MRSA samples harboring SCCmec type III or IV were misinterpreted as non-MRSA by investigators. False-positive results were mainly due to methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. For an arbitrary MRSA prevalence of 5% and based on patient sample evaluations, the positive predictive values for BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar ( approximately 84%) were the highest. The negative predictive values of all of the media were >or=92% for MRSA prevalences ranging from 5% to 30%. In conclusion, BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar gave the best overall results for detection of MRSA, irrespective of the sample concentration, investigator, or incubation period.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of molecular assays for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Publications

Evaluation of molecular assays for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets