Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The use of fasting vs. non-fasting triglyceride concentration for estimating the prevalence of high LDL-cholesterol and metabolic syndrome in population surveys.


ABSTRACT:

Background

For practical reasons it is not easy to obtain fasting samples in large population health surveys. Non-fasting triglyceride (Tg) values are difficult to interpret. The authors compared the accuracy of statistically corrected non-fasting Tg values with true fasting values and estimated the misclassification of subjects with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the metabolic syndrome.

Methods

Non-fasting blood was obtained from a population-based sample of 4282 individuals aged 24-75 years in the National FINRISK 2007 Study. Fasting blood samples were drawn from the same persons 3 months later. Non-fasting serum Tg values were converted into fasting values using previously published formula. LDL-C was calculated and classification of the metabolic syndrome was carried out according to three different latest guidelines.

Results

The median (25th, 75th percentile) non-fasting serum Tg concentration was 1.18 (0.87, 1.72) mmol/L and after postprandial correction 1.06 (0.78, 1.52) mmol/L. The true-fasting serum Tg concentration was 1.00 (0.75, 1.38) mmol/L (P < 0.001) vs. non-fasting and corrected value. Bias of the corrected value was +5.9% compared with the true-fasting Tg. Of the true fasting subjects, 56.4% had LDL-C ? 3.00 mmol/L. When calculated using non-fasting serum Tg, the prevalence of high LDL-C was 51.3% and using statistically corrected Tg it was 54.8%. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 35.5% among fully fasted persons and among non-fasting subjects 39.7%, which after statistical correction of Tg decreased to 37.6% (P < 0.001 for all comparisons).

Conclusions

Correction of non-fasting serum Tg to fasting values plays a minor role in population studies but nevertheless reduces misclassification of calculated high LDL-C from 5.1 to 1.6% and the metabolic syndrome from 4.2 to 2.1%.

SUBMITTER: Sundvall J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3112195 | biostudies-literature | 2011 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The use of fasting vs. non-fasting triglyceride concentration for estimating the prevalence of high LDL-cholesterol and metabolic syndrome in population surveys.

Sundvall Jouko J   Leiviskä Jaana J   Laatikainen Tiina T   Peltonen Markku M   Salomaa Veikko V   Vanhala Mauno M   Korpi-Hyövälti Eeva E   Lauronen Jukka J   Alfthan Georg G  

BMC medical research methodology 20110510


<h4>Background</h4>For practical reasons it is not easy to obtain fasting samples in large population health surveys. Non-fasting triglyceride (Tg) values are difficult to interpret. The authors compared the accuracy of statistically corrected non-fasting Tg values with true fasting values and estimated the misclassification of subjects with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the metabolic syndrome.<h4>Methods</h4>Non-fasting blood was obtained from a population-based sample of  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8064770 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6301972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3138874 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10801839 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7705000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6329793 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4642361 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4400108 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7590417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5509720 | biostudies-literature