Dataset Information

MicroRNA signature of cis-platin resistant vs. cis-platin sensitive ovarian cancer cell lines.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in women worldwide. According to the National Cancer Institute, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among all the reproductive cancers in women. Advanced stage diagnosis and chemo/radio-resistance is a major obstacle in treating advanced ovarian cancer. The most commonly employed chemotherapeutic drug for ovarian cancer treatment is cis-platin. As with most chemotherapeutic drugs, many patients eventually become resistant to cis-platin and therefore, diminishing its effect. The efficacy of current treatments may be improved by increasing the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemo/radiation therapies. METHODS: The present study is focused on identifying the differential expression of regulatory microRNAs (miRNAs) between cis-platin sensitive (A2780), and cis-platin resistant (A2780/CP70) cell lines. Cell proliferation assays were conducted to test the sensitivity of the two cell lines to cis-platin. Differential expression patterns of miRNA between cis-platin sensitive and cis-platin resistant cell lines were analyzed using novel LNA technology. RESULTS: Our results revealed changes in expression of 11 miRNAs out of 1,500 miRNAs analyzed. Out of the 11 miRNAs identified, 5 were up-regulated in the A2780/CP70 cell line and 6 were down regulated as compared to cis-platin sensitive A2780 cells. Our microRNA data was further validated by quantitative real-time PCR for these selected miRNAs. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was performed for the selected miRNAs and their putative targets to identify the potential pathways and networks involved in cis-platin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data clearly showed the differential expression of 11 miRNAs in cis-platin resistant cells, which could potentially target many important pathways including MAPK, TGF-? signaling, actin cytoskeleton, ubiquitin mediated proteasomal pathway, Wnt signaling, mTOR signaling, Notch signaling, apoptosis, and many other signaling pathways. Manipulation of one or more of these miRNAs could be an important approach for ovarian cancer chemotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Kumar S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3205057 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

MicroRNA signature of cis-platin resistant vs. cis-platin sensitive ovarian cancer cell lines.

Kumar Smriti S Kumar Arooshi A Shah Parag P PP Rai Shesh N SN Panguluri Siva K SK Kakar Sham S SS

Journal of ovarian research 20110922 1

<h4>Background</h4>Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in women worldwide. According to the National Cancer Institute, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among all the reproductive cancers in women. Advanced stage diagnosis and chemo/radio-resistance is a major obstacle in treating advanced ovarian cancer. The most commonly employed chemotherapeutic drug for ovarian cancer treatment is cis-platin. As with most chemotherapeutic drugs, many patients even ...[more]

PMID: 21939554

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMicroRNAs (miRs) regulate gene expression through translation inhibition of target mRNAs. One of the most promising approaches for cancer therapy is through mimicking or antagonizing the action of miRs. In this report, we analyzed the miRnome profile of several human breast cancer cell lines to determine the influence of estrogen receptor (ER) silencing previously shown to result in epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enhanced tumor invasion.MethodsMicroRNA extracted from MDA-MB-231 (de novo ER-) and ER-silenced (acquired ER-) pII and IM-26 or ER-expressing (YS1.2) siRNA transfected derivatives of MCF7 cells was deep sequenced on Illumina NextSeq500. Respective miRnomes were compared with edgeR package in R and Venny2.1 and target prediction performed with miRTarBase. Mimics and inhibitors of selected differentially expressed miRs associated with EMT mediators (miR-200c-3p targeting ZEB1, miR-449a targeting δ-catenin and miR-29a-3p) were transfected into pII cells and mRNA targets, as well as E-cadherin and keratin 19 (epithelial and mesenchymal markers respectively) were measured using taqman PCR.ResultsEach cell line expressed about 20% of the total known human miRnome; There was a high degree of similarity between the 3 tested ER-lines. Out of these expressed miRs, 50-60% were significantly differentially expressed between ER- and ER + lines. Transfection of miR-200c-3p mimic into pII cells down regulated ZEB1 and vimentin, and increased E-cadherin and keratin 19 with accompanying morphological changes, and reduced cell motility, reflecting a reversal back into an epithelial phenotype. On the other hand, transfecting pII with miR-449a inhibitor reduced cell invasion but did not induce EMT. Transfecting pII cell line with the mimic or inhibitor of miR-29a-3p showed no change in EMT markers or cell invasion suggesting that the EMT induced by loss of ER function can be reversed by blocking some but not just any random EMT-associated genes.ConclusionsThese data suggest that differences in miR expression can be exploited not only as mediators (using mimics) and targets (using miR antagonists) for general cancer therapies aimed at regulating either individual or multiple mRNAs, but also to re-sensitize endocrine resistant breast cancers by turning them back into a type that will be susceptible to endocrine agents.

Project description:Although epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are initially treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, EOCs vary in platinum responsiveness. Cataloging antineoplastic agents according to their effectiveness against platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive EOC cell lines is valuable for development of therapeutic strategies to avoid platinum inefficacy and to exploit platinum sensitivity. TOV-21G devoid of FANCF expression, OV-90 and SKOV-3 were employed as examples of platinum-sensitive, platinum-intermediate and platinum-resistant cell lines, respectively. Antineoplastic agents examined included mitomycin C, doxorubicin, etoposide, gemcitabine, chlorambucil, paclitaxel, triapine and X-rays. Their effectiveness against cell lines was analyzed by clonogenic assays. Cytotoxic profiles of mitomycin C and carboplatin were similar, with mitomycin C exhibiting greater potency and selectivity against TOV-21G than carboplatin. Cytotoxic profiles of doxorubicin, etoposide and X-rays overlapped with that of carboplatin, while OV-90 overexpressing Rad51 was more resistant to chlorambucil than SKOV-3. The efficacy of paclitaxel and triapine was independent of platinum sensitivity or resistance. Consistent with these cytotoxic profiles, cisplatin/mitomycin C, triapine, and paclitaxel differed in the capacity to induce phosphorylation of H2AX, and produced unique inhibitory patterns of DNA/RNA syntheses in HL-60 human leukemia cells. Paclitaxel and triapine in combination produced additive antitumor effects in M109 murine lung carcinoma. In conclusion, mitomycin C is potentially more effective against Fanconi anemia pathway-deficient EOCs than carboplatin. Doxorubicin and etoposide, because of their overlapping cytotoxic properties with carboplatin, are unlikely to be efficacious against platinum-refractory EOCs. Paclitaxel and triapine are effective regardless of platinum sensitivity status, and promising in combination for both platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory EOCs.

Dataset Information

MicroRNA signature of cis-platin resistant vs. cis-platin sensitive ovarian cancer cell lines.

Publications

MicroRNA signature of cis-platin resistant vs. cis-platin sensitive ovarian cancer cell lines.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets