Dataset Information

Quantitative magnetic resonance fat measurements in humans correlate with established methods but are biased.

ABSTRACT: Precision and accuracy of the quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) system for measuring fat in phantoms and total body fat (TBF) in humans were investigated. Measurements were made using phantoms: oil, beef with water, beef with oil, and humans with oil and water. TBF(QMR) in humans was compared with TBF by a four-compartment model (TBF(4C)). The coefficient of variation (CV) for replicate TBF(QMR) was 0.437%. QMR fat was lower at 23 °C vs. 37 °C. The fat increase in QMR phantom studies was consistent with the oil increase. When oil was added with humans, the increase in TBF(QMR) was >250 g for the initial 250 g of oil. With additional oil increments, the increase in TBF(QMR) was consistent with the amount of oil added. When water was added with humans, the TBF(QMR) increased independent of the amount of water added. TBF(QMR) was significantly less (mean ± s.e.) than TBF(4C) (females: -0.68 ± 0.27 kg, males: -4.66 ± 0.62 kg; P = 0.0001), TBF(BV) (females: -1.90 ± 0.40 kg; males: -5.68 ± 0.75 kg; P = 0.0001), and TBF(D2O) for males, but greater for females (1.19 ± 0.43 kg vs. -3.69 ± 0.81 kg for males; P = 0.0003). TBF(QMR) was lower than TBF(iDXA) with the difference greater in males (P = 0.001) and decreased with age (P = 0.011). The strong linear relationships between TBF(QMR) and TBF(4C), TBF(BV), and TBF(D2O) with slopes consistent with unity suggest that modifications are required to improve the accuracy. Should the latter be accomplished, QMR holds promise as a highly precise, rapid, and safe, noninvasive method for estimating the amount of and changes in TBF in overweight and severely obese persons.

SUBMITTER: Gallagher D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3312473 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantitative magnetic resonance fat measurements in humans correlate with established methods but are biased.

Gallagher Dympna D Thornton John C JC He Qing Q Wang Jack J Yu Wen W Bradstreet Thomas E TE Burke Joanne J Heymsfield Steven B SB Rivas Veronica M VM Kaufman Rhonda R

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 20100506 10

Precision and accuracy of the quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) system for measuring fat in phantoms and total body fat (TBF) in humans were investigated. Measurements were made using phantoms: oil, beef with water, beef with oil, and humans with oil and water. TBF(QMR) in humans was compared with TBF by a four-compartment model (TBF(4C)). The coefficient of variation (CV) for replicate TBF(QMR) was 0.437%. QMR fat was lower at 23 °C vs. 37 °C. The fat increase in QMR phantom studies was con ...[more]

PMID: 20448539

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has been recently introduced to simultaneously provide T1 , T2 , and M0 maps. Here, we develop a 3-point Dixon-cMRF approach to enable simultaneous water specific T1 , T2 , and M0 mapping of the heart and fat fraction (FF) estimation in a single breath-hold scan. METHODS:Dixon-cMRF is achieved by combining cMRF with several innovations that were previously introduced for other applications, including a 3-echo GRE acquisition with golden angle radial readout and a high-dimensional low-rank tensor constrained reconstruction to recover the highly undersampled time series images for each echo. Water-fat separation of the Dixon-cMRF time series is performed to allow for water- and fat-specific T1 , T2 , and M0 estimation, whereas FF estimation is extracted from the M0 maps. Dixon-cMRF was evaluated in a standardized T1 -T2 phantom, in a water-fat phantom, and in healthy subjects in comparison to current clinical standards: MOLLI, SASHA, T2 -GRASE, and 6-point Dixon proton density FF (PDFF) mapping. RESULTS:Dixon-cMRF water T1 and T2 maps showed good agreement with reference T1 and T2 mapping techniques (R2 > 0.99 and maximum normalized RMSE ~5%) in a standardized phantom. Good agreement was also observed between Dixon-cMRF FF and reference PDFF (R2 > 0.99) and between Dixon-cMRF water T1 and T2 and water selective T1 and T2 maps (R2 > 0.99) in a water-fat phantom. In vivo Dixon-cMRF water T1 values were in good agreement with MOLLI and water T2 values were slightly underestimated when compared to T2 -GRASE. Average myocardium septal T1 values were 1129 ± 38 ms, 1026 ± 28 ms, and 1045 ± 32 ms for SASHA, MOLLI, and the proposed water Dixon-cMRF. Average T2 values were 51.7 ± 2.2 ms and 42.8 ± 2.6 ms for T2 -GRASE and water Dixon-cMRF, respectively. Dixon-cMRF FF maps showed good agreement with in vivo PDFF measurements (R2 > 0.98) and average FF in the septum was measured at 1.3%. CONCLUSION:The proposed Dixon-cMRF allows to simultaneously quantify myocardial water T1 , water T2 , and FF in a single breath-hold scan, enabling multi-parametric T1 , T2 , and fat characterization. Moreover, reduced T1 and T2 quantification bias caused by water-fat partial volume was demonstrated in phantom experiments.

Project description:In light of global climate change, ecological studies increasingly address effects of temperature on organisms and ecosystems. To measure air temperature at biologically relevant scales in the field, ecologists often use small, portable temperature sensors. Sensors must be shielded from solar radiation to provide accurate temperature measurements, but our review of 18 years of ecological literature indicates that shielding practices vary across studies (when reported at all), and that ecologists often invent and construct ad hoc radiation shields without testing their efficacy. We performed two field experiments to examine the accuracy of temperature observations from three commonly used portable data loggers (HOBO Pro, HOBO Pendant, and iButton hygrochron) housed in manufactured Gill shields or ad hoc, custom-fabricated shields constructed from everyday materials such as plastic cups. We installed this sensor array (five replicates of 11 sensor-shield combinations) at weather stations located in open and forested sites. HOBO Pro sensors with Gill shields were the most accurate devices, with a mean absolute error of 0.2°C relative to weather stations at each site. Error in ad hoc shield treatments ranged from 0.8 to 3.0°C, with the largest errors at the open site. We then deployed one replicate of each sensor-shield combination at five sites that varied in the amount of urban impervious surface cover, which presents a further shielding challenge. Bias in sensors paired with ad hoc shields increased by up to 0.7°C for every 10% increase in impervious surface. Our results indicate that, due to variable shielding practices, the ecological literature likely includes highly biased temperature data that cannot be compared directly across studies. If left unaddressed, these errors will hinder efforts to predict biological responses to climate change. We call for greater standardization in how temperature data are recorded in the field, handled in analyses, and reported in publications.

Project description:Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion imaging has the potential to evolve into a method allowing full quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in clinical routine. Multiple quantification pathways have been proposed. However at present it remains unclear which algorithm is the most accurate. An isolated perfused, magnetic resonance (MR) compatible pig heart model allows very accurate titration of MBF and in combination with high-resolution assessment of fluorescently-labeled microspheres represents a near optimal platform for validation. We sought to investigate which algorithm is most suited to quantify myocardial perfusion by CMR at 1.5 and 3 Tesla using state of the art CMR perfusion techniques and quantification algorithms.First-pass perfusion CMR was performed in an MR compatible blood perfused pig heart model. We acquired perfusion images at physiological flow ("rest"), reduced flow ("ischaemia") and during adenosine-induced hyperaemia ("hyperaemia") as well as during coronary occlusion. Perfusion CMR was performed at 1.5 Tesla (n?=?4 animals) and at 3 Tesla (n?=?4 animals). Fluorescently-labeled microspheres and externally controlled coronary blood flow served as reference standards for comparison of different quantification strategies, namely Fermi function deconvolution (Fermi), autoregressive moving average modelling (ARMA), exponential basis deconvolution (Exponential) and B-spline basis deconvolution (B-spline).All CMR derived MBF estimates significantly correlated with microsphere results. The best correlation was achieved with Fermi function deconvolution both at 1.5 Tesla (r?=?0.93, p?<?0.001) and at 3 Tesla (r?=?0.9, p < 0.001). Fermi correlated significantly better with the microspheres than all other methods at 3 Tesla (p < 0.002). B-spline performed worse than Fermi and Exponential at 1.5 Tesla and showed the weakest correlation to microspheres (r?=?0.74, p?<?0.001). All other comparisons were not significant. At 3 Tesla exponential deconvolution performed worst (r?=?0.49, p < 0.001).CMR derived quantitative blood flow estimates correlate with true myocardial blood flow in a controlled animal model. Amongst the different techniques, Fermi function deconvolution was the most accurate technique at both field strengths. Perfusion CMR based on Fermi function deconvolution may therefore emerge as a useful clinical tool providing accurate quantitative blood flow assessment.

Dataset Information

Quantitative magnetic resonance fat measurements in humans correlate with established methods but are biased.

Publications

Quantitative magnetic resonance fat measurements in humans correlate with established methods but are biased.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets