Dataset Information

Strength training and testosterone treatment have opposing effects on migration inhibitor factor levels in ageing men.

ABSTRACT: The beneficial effects of testosterone treatment (TT) are debated.Double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of six months TT (gel) in 54 men aged 60-78 with bioavailable testosterone (BioT) <7.3?nmol/L and waist >94?cm randomized to TT (50-100?mg/day, n = 20), placebo (n = 18), or strength training (ST) (n = 16) for 24 weeks. Moreover, the ST group was randomized to TT (n = 7) or placebo (n = 9) after 12 weeks.Chemokines (MIF, MCP-1, and MIP-1 ? ) and lean body mass (LBM), total, central, extremity, visceral, and subcutaneous (SAT) fat mass established by DXA and MRI. Results. From 0 to 24 weeks, MIF and SAT decreased during ST + placebo versus placebo, whereas BioT and LBM were unchanged. TT decreased fat mass (total, central, extremity, and SAT) and increased BioT and LBM versus placebo. MIF levels increased during TT versus ST + placebo. ST + TT decreased fat mass (total, central, and extremity) and increased BioT and LBM versus placebo. From 12 to 24 weeks, MCP-1 levels increased during TT versus placebo and MCP-1 levels decreased during ST + placebo versus placebo.ST + placebo was associated with decreased MIF levels suggesting decreased inflammatory activity. TT may be associated with increased inflammatory activity.

SUBMITTER: Glintborg D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3781991 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Strength training and testosterone treatment have opposing effects on migration inhibitor factor levels in ageing men.

Glintborg D D Christensen L L LL Kvorning T T Larsen R R Brixen K K Hougaard D M DM Richelsen B B Richelsen B B Richelsen B B Bruun J M JM Andersen M M

Mediators of inflammation 20130908

<h4>Background</h4>The beneficial effects of testosterone treatment (TT) are debated.<h4>Methods</h4>Double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of six months TT (gel) in 54 men aged 60-78 with bioavailable testosterone (BioT) <7.3 nmol/L and waist >94 cm randomized to TT (50-100 mg/day, n = 20), placebo (n = 18), or strength training (ST) (n = 16) for 24 weeks. Moreover, the ST group was randomized to TT (n = 7) or placebo (n = 9) after 12 weeks.<h4>Outcomes</h4>Chemokines (MIF, MCP-1, and MIP-1 α ...[more]

PMID: 24089589

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionTestosterone therapy (TTH) for testosterone deficiency (TD) may lead to elevated estradiol (E2) levels requiring management to avoid unnecessary adverse effects.AimTo examine the impact of aromatase inhibitors, specifically anastrozole (AZ), in men with elevated E2 on TTH.MethodsAll patients on TTH at a high volume sexual medicine practice between 2005 and 2019 were reviewed. Men with E2 levels >60 pg/mL regardless of symptoms or 40-60 pg/mL with subjective symptoms were started on AZ 0.5 mg 3x/week. Routine hormone profile and symptom assessment were completed to ensure symptom resolution, reduction of E2 levels and maintenance of testosterone levels. Multivariable logistic regression was completed to determine predictors of men more likely to respond to therapy.Main outcome measureDemographic and hormonal profiles of men on AZ and predictors of response to therapy.Results1708 men with TD were placed on TTH. Of these, 51 (3%) were treated with AZ (AZ+). After exclusions, 44 (2.6%) had elevated estradiol levels >60 pg/mL or >40 pg/mL with symptoms. Demographics were similar between groups. TTH distribution between groups was different with greater rates of topical TTH in the AZ- groups (AZ+:34.1% vs AZ-:53.5%) and greater rates of intramuscular TTH in the AZ+ group (AZ+:38.6% vs AZ-:18.5%) (P = .017 overall). Of the 44 men treated with AZ, 68.0% had pre-AZ E2 levels ≥60 pg/mL and 32.0% had levels between 40 and 60 pg/mL. Median pre-AZ E2 levels were 65 (interquartile range [IQR], 55-94) pg/mL in comparison to 22 (IQR 15-38) pg/mL post-AZ E2 levels (P < .001). Total testosterone levels were similar before and after AZ use (616 (IQR 548-846) ng/dL and 596 (IQR 419-798) ng/dL, respectively, P = .926). No statistically significant predictive factors of E2 reduction using AZ were found.ConclusionWhile no statistically significant predictors for E2 recovery in men on AZ were found, AZ remains a reasonable option for E2 reduction in men with elevated levels on TTH. Punjani N, Bernie H, Salter C, et al. The Utilization and Impact of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy in Men With Elevated Estradiol Levels on Testosterone Therapy. Sex Med 2021;9:100378.

Project description:ImportanceAs men age, they experience decreased serum testosterone concentrations, decreased bone mineral density (BMD), and increased risk of fracture.ObjectiveTo determine whether testosterone treatment of older men with low testosterone increases volumetric BMD (vBMD) and estimated bone strength.Design, setting, and participantsPlacebo-controlled, double-blind trial with treatment allocation by minimization at 9 US academic medical centers of men 65 years or older with 2 testosterone concentrations averaging less than 275 ng/L participating in the Testosterone Trials from December 2011 to June 2014. The analysis was a modified intent-to-treat comparison of treatment groups by multivariable linear regression adjusted for balancing factors as required by minimization.InterventionsTestosterone gel, adjusted to maintain the testosterone level within the normal range for young men, or placebo gel for 1 year.Main outcomes and measuresSpine and hip vBMD was determined by quantitative computed tomography at baseline and 12 months. Bone strength was estimated by finite element analysis of quantitative computed tomography data. Areal BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months.ResultsThere were 211 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.3 [5.9] years; 86% white; mean [SD] body mass index, 31.2 [3.4]). Testosterone treatment was associated with significantly greater increases than placebo in mean spine trabecular vBMD (7.5%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 10.3% vs 0.8%; 95% CI, -1.9% to 3.4%; treatment effect, 6.8%; 95% CI, 4.8%-8.7%; P < .001), spine peripheral vBMD, hip trabecular and peripheral vBMD, and mean estimated strength of spine trabecular bone (10.8%; 95% CI, 7.4% to 14.3% vs 2.4%; 95% CI, -1.0% to 5.7%; treatment effect, 8.5%; 95% CI, 6.0%-10.9%; P < .001), spine peripheral bone, and hip trabecular and peripheral bone. The estimated strength increases were greater in trabecular than peripheral bone and greater in the spine than hip. Testosterone treatment increased spine areal BMD but less than vBMD.Conclusions and relevanceTestosterone treatment for 1 year of older men with low testosterone significantly increased vBMD and estimated bone strength, more in trabecular than peripheral bone and more in the spine than hip. A larger, longer trial could determine whether this treatment also reduces fracture risk.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00799617.

Dataset Information

Strength training and testosterone treatment have opposing effects on migration inhibitor factor levels in ageing men.

Publications

Strength training and testosterone treatment have opposing effects on migration inhibitor factor levels in ageing men.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets