Dataset Information

Automatic extraction of nanoparticle properties using natural language processing: NanoSifter an application to acquire PAMAM dendrimer properties.

ABSTRACT: In this study, we demonstrate the use of natural language processing methods to extract, from nanomedicine literature, numeric values of biomedical property terms of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers. We have developed a method for extracting these values for properties taken from the NanoParticle Ontology, using the General Architecture for Text Engineering and a Nearly-New Information Extraction System. We also created a method for associating the identified numeric values with their corresponding dendrimer properties, called NanoSifter. We demonstrate that our system can correctly extract numeric values of dendrimer properties reported in the cancer treatment literature with high recall, precision, and f-measure. The micro-averaged recall was 0.99, precision was 0.84, and f-measure was 0.91. Similarly, the macro-averaged recall was 0.99, precision was 0.87, and f-measure was 0.92. To our knowledge, these results are the first application of text mining to extract and associate dendrimer property terms and their corresponding numeric values.

SUBMITTER: Jones DE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3879259 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Automatic extraction of nanoparticle properties using natural language processing: NanoSifter an application to acquire PAMAM dendrimer properties.

Jones David E DE Igo Sean S Hurdle John J Facelli Julio C JC

PloS one 20140102 1

In this study, we demonstrate the use of natural language processing methods to extract, from nanomedicine literature, numeric values of biomedical property terms of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers. We have developed a method for extracting these values for properties taken from the NanoParticle Ontology, using the General Architecture for Text Engineering and a Nearly-New Information Extraction System. We also created a method for associating the identified numeric values with their corresponding d ...[more]

PMID: 24392101

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNatural language processing (NLP) offers significantly faster variable extraction compared to traditional human extraction but cannot interpret complicated notes as well as humans can. Thus, we hypothesized that an "NLP-assisted" extraction system, which uses humans for complicated notes and NLP for uncomplicated notes, could produce faster extraction without compromising accuracy.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and pilot an NLP-assisted extraction system to leverage the strengths of both human and NLP extraction of prostate cancer Gleason scores.MethodsWe collected all available clinical and pathology notes for prostate cancer patients in an unselected academic biobank cohort. We developed an NLP system to extract prostate cancer Gleason scores from both clinical and pathology notes. Next, we designed and implemented the NLP-assisted extraction system algorithm to categorize notes into "uncomplicated" and "complicated" notes. Uncomplicated notes were assigned to NLP extraction and complicated notes were assigned to human extraction. We randomly reviewed 200 patients to assess the accuracy and speed of our NLP-assisted extraction system and compared it to NLP extraction alone and human extraction alone.ResultsOf the 2051 patients in our cohort, the NLP system extracted a prostate surgery Gleason score from 1147 (55.92%) patients and a prostate biopsy Gleason score from 1624 (79.18%) patients. Our NLP-assisted extraction system had an overall accuracy rate of 98.7%, which was similar to the accuracy of human extraction alone (97.5%; P=.17) and significantly higher than the accuracy of NLP extraction alone (95.3%; P<.001). Moreover, our NLP-assisted extraction system reduced the workload of human extractors by approximately 95%, resulting in an average extraction time of 12.7 seconds per patient (vs 256.1 seconds per patient for human extraction alone).ConclusionsWe demonstrated that an NLP-assisted extraction system was able to achieve much faster Gleason score extraction compared to traditional human extraction without sacrificing accuracy.

Project description:BackgroundMulti-center electronic health records (EHR) can support quality improvement initiatives and comparative effectiveness research in stroke care. However, limitations of EHR-based research include challenges in abstracting key clinical variables from non-structured data at scale. This is further compounded by missing data. Here we develop a natural language processing (NLP) model that automatically reads EHR notes to determine the NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) score of patients with acute stroke.MethodsThe study included notes from acute stroke patients (>= 18 years) admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) (2015-2022). The MGH data were divided into training (70%) and hold-out test (30%) sets. A two-stage model was developed to predict the admission NIHSS. A linear model with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was trained within the training set. For notes in the test set where the NIHSS was documented, the scores were extracted using regular expressions (stage 1), for notes where NIHSS was not documented, LASSO was used for prediction (stage 2). The reference standard for NIHSS was obtained from Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry. The two-stage model was tested on the hold-out test set and validated in the MIMIC-III dataset (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-MIMIC III 2001-2012) v1.4, using root mean squared error (RMSE) and Spearman correlation (SC).ResultsWe included 4,163 patients (MGH = 3,876; MIMIC = 287); average age of 69 [SD 15] years; 53% male, and 72% white. 90% patients had ischemic stroke and 10% hemorrhagic stroke. The two-stage model achieved a RMSE [95% CI] of 3.13 [2.86-3.41] (SC = 0.90 [0.88-0. 91]) in the MGH hold-out test set and 2.01 [1.58-2.38] (SC = 0.96 [0.94-0.97]) in the MIMIC validation set.ConclusionsThe automatic NLP-based model can enable large-scale stroke severity phenotyping from EHR and therefore support real-world quality improvement and comparative effectiveness studies in stroke.

Project description:IntroductionEarly diagnosis and etiological treatment can effectively improve the prognosis of patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE). However, anti-neuronal antibody tests which provide the definitive diagnosis require time and are not always abnormal. By using natural language processing (NLP) technology, our study proposes an assisted diagnostic method for early clinical diagnosis of AE and compares its sensitivity with that of previously established criteria.MethodsOur model is based on the text classification model trained by the history of present illness (HPI) in electronic medical records (EMRs) that present a definite pathological diagnosis of AE or infectious encephalitis (IE). The definitive diagnosis of IE was based on the results of traditional etiological examinations. The definitive diagnosis of AE was based on the results of neuronal antibodies, and the diagnostic criteria of definite autoimmune limbic encephalitis proposed by Graus et al. used as the reference standard for antibody-negative AE. First, we automatically recognized and extracted symptoms for all HPI texts in EMRs by training a dataset of 552 cases. Second, four text classification models trained by a dataset of 199 cases were established for differential diagnosis of AE and IE based on a post-structuring text dataset of every HPI, which was completed using symptoms in English language after the process of normalization of synonyms. The optimal model was identified by evaluating and comparing the performance of the four models. Finally, combined with three typical symptoms and the results of standard paraclinical tests such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or electroencephalogram (EEG) proposed from Graus criteria, an assisted early diagnostic model for AE was established on the basis of the text classification model with the best performance.ResultsThe comparison results for the four models applied to the independent testing dataset showed the naïve Bayesian classifier with bag of words achieved the best performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, accuracy of 84.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.0-92.0%), sensitivity of 86.7% (95% CI 69.3-96.2%), and specificity of 82.9% (95% CI 67.9-92.8%), respectively. Compared with the diagnostic criteria proposed previously, the early diagnostic sensitivity for possible AE using the assisted diagnostic model based on the independent testing dataset was improved from 73.3% (95% CI 54.1-87.7%) to 86.7% (95% CI 69.3-96.2%).ConclusionsThe assisted diagnostic model could effectively increase the early diagnostic sensitivity for AE compared to previous diagnostic criteria, assist physicians in establishing the diagnosis of AE automatically after inputting the HPI and the results of standard paraclinical tests according to their narrative habits for describing symptoms, avoiding misdiagnosis and allowing for prompt initiation of specific treatment.

Dataset Information

Automatic extraction of nanoparticle properties using natural language processing: NanoSifter an application to acquire PAMAM dendrimer properties.

Publications

Automatic extraction of nanoparticle properties using natural language processing: NanoSifter an application to acquire PAMAM dendrimer properties.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets