Dataset Information

Gene expression profile analyses of mice livers injured by Leigongteng.

ABSTRACT: AIM:To analyze the gene expression profiles of mice livers injured by Leigongteng and explore the relationship between the differentially expressed genes and liver damage. METHODS:The experimental mice were randomly divided into a control group and a liver-injured group in which the mice were administrated 33 mu gamma of triptolide/kg per day for 30 d. Liver mRNAs were extracted from animals in both groups and were reverse-transcribed to cDNA with dUTP labeled by different fluorescence (Cy3, Cy5) as hybridization probes. The mixed probes were hybridized with oligonucleotide microarray chips. The fluorescent signal results were acquired by scanner and analyzed with software. RESULTS:Among the 35852 target genes, 29 genes were found to be significantly differentially expressed, with 20 genes up-regulated and 9 genes down-regulated. The reliability of the differentially expressed genes was validated by RT-PCR experiments of 5 randomly selected differentially expressed genes. CONCLUSION:Based on the biological functions of the differentially expressed genes, it is obvious that the occurrence and development of liver damage induced by Leigongteng in mice are highly associated with immune response, metabolism, apoptosis and the cell skeleton of liver cells. This might be important for elucidating the regulatory network of gene expression associated with liver damage and it may also be important for discovering the pathogenic mechanisms of liver damage induced by Leigongteng.

SUBMITTER: Chen Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4146803 | biostudies-literature | 2007 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gene expression profile analyses of mice livers injured by Leigongteng.

Chen Yong Y Zhang Xiao-Ming XM Han Feng-Mei FM Du Peng P Xia Qi-Song QS

World journal of gastroenterology 20070701 26

<h4>Aim</h4>To analyze the gene expression profiles of mice livers injured by Leigongteng and explore the relationship between the differentially expressed genes and liver damage.<h4>Methods</h4>The experimental mice were randomly divided into a control group and a liver-injured group in which the mice were administrated 33 mu gamma of triptolide/kg per day for 30 d. Liver mRNAs were extracted from animals in both groups and were reverse-transcribed to cDNA with dUTP labeled by different fluores ...[more]

PMID: 17659714

Similar Datasets

Project description:Mouse is the most widely used animal model in biomedical research, but it remains unknown what causes the large number of differentially regulated genes between human and mouse livers identified in recent years. In this report, we aim to determine whether these divergent gene regulations are primarily caused by environmental factors or some of them are the result of cell-autonomous differences in gene regulation in human and mouse liver cells. The latter scenario would suggest that many human genes are subject to human-specific regulation and can only be adequately studied in a human or humanized system. To understand the similarity and divergence of gene regulation between human and mouse livers, we performed stepwise comparative analyses in human, mouse, and humanized livers with increased stringency to gradually remove the impact of factors external to liver cells, and used bioinformatics approaches to retrieve gene networks to ascertain the regulated biological processes. We first compared liver gene regulation by fatty liver disease in human and mouse under the condition where the impact of genetic and gender biases was minimized, and identified over 50% of all commonly regulated genes, that exhibit opposite regulation by fatty liver disease in human and mouse. We subsequently performed more stringent comparisons when a single specific transcriptional or post-transcriptional event was modulated in vitro or vivo or in liver-specific humanized mice in which human and mouse hepatocytes colocalize and share a common circulation. Intriguingly and strikingly, the pattern of a high percentage of oppositely regulated genes persists under well-matched conditions, even in the liver of the humanized mouse model, which represents the most closely matched in vivo condition for human and mouse liver cells that is experimentally achievable. Gene network analyses further corroborated the results of oppositely regulated genes and revealed substantial differences in regulated biological processes in human and mouse cells. We also identified a list of regulated lncRNAs that exhibit very limited conservation and could contribute to these differential gene regulations. Our data support that cell-autonomous differences in gene regulation might contribute substantially to the divergent gene regulation between human and mouse livers and there are a significant number of biological processes that are subject to human-specific regulation and need to be carefully considered in the process of mouse to human translation.

Project description:PurposeIncreasing evidence suggests myopia is not a simple refractive error, many other factors might also be involved. Here, we assessed myopic and normal corneas' gene expression profiles to identify possible diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for myopia.Materials and methodsWe obtained the expression profile of ten patients and seven normal control samples from the GSE112155 and GSE151631 datasets based on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We used the "limma" R package to determine the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between myopic and normal corneas. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify critical co-expressed modules related to myopia, and enrichment analyses were used to annotate the function of genes encompassed in the compulsory module. We also validated these findings in two external datasets (GSE24641 and GSE136701).ResultsWe identified that the DEGs were significantly enriched in ultraviolet (UV) response, TNF-α signaling via NFκB, Angiogenesis, Myogenesis pathways, etc. We used 2095 genes to construct the co-expression gene modules and found five interesting modules because the eigengene expression of these modules was significantly differentially expressed between myopic and normal corneas. Notably, the enrichment analysis found that the genes encompassed in lightgreen module were significantly enriched in immune-related pathways. These findings were proved by subsequent analysis based on Xcell software. We found the component of B cells, CD4+ memory T cells, CD8+ central memory T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, T helper 2 (Th2) cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), etc. were significantly increased in myopic corneas, while CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T central memory cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, and T helper 1 (Th1) cells were significantly decreased.ConclusionOur findings identified some markers that might detect diagnosis and treatment for myopia from cornea aspect. Future studies are warranted to verify the functional role of immune-related pathways in cornea during the pathogenesis or progression of myopia.

Dataset Information

Gene expression profile analyses of mice livers injured by Leigongteng.

Publications

Gene expression profile analyses of mice livers injured by Leigongteng.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets