Dataset Information

How a spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements is dispersed in the universe of protein folds.

ABSTRACT: It has been known that topologically different proteins of the same class sometimes share the same spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements (SSEs). However, the frequency by which topologically different structures share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs is unclear. It is important to estimate this frequency because it provides both a deeper understanding of the geometry of protein folds and a valuable suggestion for predicting protein structures with novel folds. Here we clarified the frequency with which protein folds share the same SSE packing arrangement with other folds, the types of spatial arrangement of SSEs that are frequently observed across different folds, and the diversity of protein folds that share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs with a given fold, using a protein structure alignment program MICAN, which we have been developing. By performing comprehensive structural comparison of SCOP fold representatives, we found that approximately 80% of protein folds share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs with other folds. We also observed that many protein pairs that share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs belong to the different classes, often with an opposing N- to C-terminal direction of the polypeptide chain. The most frequently observed spatial arrangement of SSEs was the 2-layer ?/? packing arrangement and it was dispersed among as many as 27% of SCOP fold representatives. These results suggest that the same spatial arrangements of SSEs are adopted by a wide variety of different folds and that the spatial arrangement of SSEs is highly robust against the N- to C-terminal direction of the polypeptide chain.

SUBMITTER: Minami S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4171485 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

How a spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements is dispersed in the universe of protein folds.

Minami Shintaro S Sawada Kengo K Chikenji George G

PloS one 20140922 9

It has been known that topologically different proteins of the same class sometimes share the same spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements (SSEs). However, the frequency by which topologically different structures share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs is unclear. It is important to estimate this frequency because it provides both a deeper understanding of the geometry of protein folds and a valuable suggestion for predicting protein structures with novel folds. Here we clarified ...[more]

PMID: 25243952

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe formation of contacts among protein secondary structure elements (SSEs) is an important step in protein folding as it determines topology of protein tertiary structure; hence, inferring inter-SSE contacts is crucial to protein structure prediction. One of the existing strategies infers inter-SSE contacts directly from the predicted possibilities of inter-residue contacts without any preprocessing, and thus suffers from the excessive noises existing in the predicted inter-residue contacts. Another strategy defines SSEs based on protein secondary structure prediction first, and then judges whether each candidate SSE pair could form contact or not. However, it is difficult to accurately determine boundary of SSEs due to the errors in secondary structure prediction. The incorrectly-deduced SSEs definitely hinder subsequent prediction of the contacts among them.ResultsWe here report an accurate approach to infer the inter-SSE contacts (thus called as ISSEC) using the deep object detection technique. The design of ISSEC is based on the observation that, in the inter-residue contact map, the contacting SSEs usually form rectangle regions with characteristic patterns. Therefore, ISSEC infers inter-SSE contacts through detecting such rectangle regions. Unlike the existing approach directly using the predicted probabilities of inter-residue contact, ISSEC applies the deep convolution technique to extract high-level features from the inter-residue contacts. More importantly, ISSEC does not rely on the pre-defined SSEs. Instead, ISSEC enumerates multiple candidate rectangle regions in the predicted inter-residue contact map, and for each region, ISSEC calculates a confidence score to measure whether it has characteristic patterns or not. ISSEC employs greedy strategy to select non-overlapping regions with high confidence score, and finally infers inter-SSE contacts according to these regions.ConclusionsComprehensive experimental results suggested that ISSEC outperformed the state-of-the-art approaches in predicting inter-SSE contacts. We further demonstrated the successful applications of ISSEC to improve prediction of both inter-residue contacts and tertiary structure as well.

Project description:BackgroundThe thylakoid system in plant chloroplasts is organized into two distinct domains: grana arranged in stacks of appressed membranes and non-appressed membranes consisting of stroma thylakoids and margins of granal stacks. It is argued that the reason for the development of appressed membranes in plants is that their photosynthetic apparatus need to cope with and survive ever-changing environmental conditions. It is not known however, why different plant species have different arrangements of grana within their chloroplasts. It is important to elucidate whether a different arrangement and distribution of appressed and non-appressed thylakoids in chloroplasts are linked with different qualitative and/or quantitative organization of chlorophyll-protein (CP) complexes in the thylakoid membranes and whether this arrangement influences the photosynthetic efficiency.ResultsOur results from TEM and in situ CLSM strongly indicate the existence of different arrangements of pea and bean thylakoid membranes. In pea, larger appressed thylakoids are regularly arranged within chloroplasts as uniformly distributed red fluorescent bodies, while irregular appressed thylakoid membranes within bean chloroplasts correspond to smaller and less distinguished fluorescent areas in CLSM images. 3D models of pea chloroplasts show a distinct spatial separation of stacked thylakoids from stromal spaces whereas spatial division of stroma and thylakoid areas in bean chloroplasts are more complex. Structural differences influenced the PSII photochemistry, however without significant changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of chlorophyll-protein complexes as well as spectroscopic investigations indicated a similar proportion between PSI and PSII core complexes in pea and bean thylakoids, but higher abundance of LHCII antenna in pea ones. Furthermore, distinct differences in size and arrangements of LHCII-PSII and LHCI-PSI supercomplexes between species are suggested.ConclusionsBased on proteomic and spectroscopic investigations we postulate that the differences in the chloroplast structure between the analyzed species are a consequence of quantitative proportions between the individual CP complexes and its arrangement inside membranes. Such a structure of membranes induced the formation of large stacked domains in pea, or smaller heterogeneous regions in bean thylakoids. Presented 3D models of chloroplasts showed that stacked areas are noticeably irregular with variable thickness, merging with each other and not always parallel to each other.

Dataset Information

How a spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements is dispersed in the universe of protein folds.

Publications

How a spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements is dispersed in the universe of protein folds.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets