Dataset Information

Immunohistochemistry of colorectal cancer biomarker phosphorylation requires controlled tissue fixation.

ABSTRACT: Phosphorylated signaling molecules are biomarkers of cancer pathophysiology and resistance to therapy, but because phosphoprotein analytes are often labile, poorly controlled clinical laboratory practices could prevent translation of research findings in this area from the bench to the bedside. We therefore compared multiple biomarker and phosphoprotein immunohistochemistry (IHC) results in 23 clinical colorectal carcinoma samples after either a novel, rapid tissue fixation protocol or a standard tissue fixation protocol employed by clinical laboratories, and we also investigated the effect of a defined post-operative "cold" ischemia period on these IHC results. We found that a one-hour cold ischemia interval, allowed by ASCO/CAP guidelines for certain cancer biomarker assays, is highly deleterious to certain phosphoprotein analytes, specifically the phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (pEGFR), but shorter ischemic intervals (less than 17 minutes) facilitate preservation of phosphoproteins. Second, we found that a rapid 4-hour, two temperature, formalin fixation yielded superior staining in several cases with select markers (pEGFR, pBAD, pAKT) compared to a standard overnight room temperature fixation protocol, despite taking less time. These findings indicate that the future research and clinical utilities of phosphoprotein IHC for assessing colorectal carcinoma pathophysiology absolutely depend upon attention to preanalytical factors and rigorously controlled tissue fixation protocols.

SUBMITTER: Theiss AP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4237459 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immunohistochemistry of colorectal cancer biomarker phosphorylation requires controlled tissue fixation.

Theiss Abbey P AP Chafin David D Bauer Daniel R DR Grogan Thomas M TM Baird Geoffrey S GS

PloS one 20141119 11

Phosphorylated signaling molecules are biomarkers of cancer pathophysiology and resistance to therapy, but because phosphoprotein analytes are often labile, poorly controlled clinical laboratory practices could prevent translation of research findings in this area from the bench to the bedside. We therefore compared multiple biomarker and phosphoprotein immunohistochemistry (IHC) results in 23 clinical colorectal carcinoma samples after either a novel, rapid tissue fixation protocol or a standar ...[more]

PMID: 25409462

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFor stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Consensus molecular subtype (CMS) has been validated to be a prognostic tool for CRCs. In this study, CMS status was investigated as a prognostic biomarker for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer.Materials and methodsThe tissue microarray was retrospectively constructed of 165 nonconsecutive, primary, and sporadic stage II CRCs. CMS status was determined by immunohistochemistry staining of CDX2, HTR2B, FRMD6, and ZEB1, combining with microsatellite instability testing. The prognostic for adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy of CMS status was calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to tumor location.ResultsKaplan-Meier curves indicated that CMS was associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival for stage II CRCs. Cox regression analysis showed that CMS was an independent risk factor for OS. Among high-risk clinicopathological factors, patients with CMS2/3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.445, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.227-0.875), left-sided tumors (HR: 0.488, 95% CI: 0.247-0.968), or fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined (HR: 0.307, 95% CI: 0.097-0.974) had survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy only improved OS for patients with left-sided tumors of CMS2/3 subtype. Regardless of CMS, right-sided tumors had no benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.ConclusionCMS is a better prognostic factor for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CRCs. Together with tumor location, CMS classification will aid in personalized treatment for stage II CRCs.Implications for practiceFor stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial, in that its minimal benefit (no more than 5% on average) is considered not worth the toxic effects of the drugs. There are still no effective prognostic and predictive biomarkers. This study showed that consensus molecular subtype (CMS) status is a predictive marker for adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy. Patients with left-sided tumors of CMS2/3 subtype have survival benefit by receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, which will aid in personalized treatment for stage II CRCs. Moreover, this test of CMS based on immunohistochemistry is cheap, not time consuming, and easily conducted in the laboratories of most hospitals.

Dataset Information

Immunohistochemistry of colorectal cancer biomarker phosphorylation requires controlled tissue fixation.

Publications

Immunohistochemistry of colorectal cancer biomarker phosphorylation requires controlled tissue fixation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets