Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Aim of the study
Results of recent published studies on the association between the COX-2 8473T>C polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer have often been conflicting. To make a more precise estimation of the potential relationship, a meta-analysis was performed.Material and methods
A total of seven case-control studies with 7,033 cases and 9,350 controls were included in the current meta-analysis through searching the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to March 1(st), 2013). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to assess the strength of the association. The meta-analysis was conducted in a fixed/random effect model.Results
We found no significant associations for all genetic models after all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (for C vs. T: OR = 0.974, 95% CI: 0.906-1.047, p = 0.471; for CC vs. TT: OR = 0.957, 95% CI: 0.803-1.140, p = 0.62; for TC vs. TT: OR = 0.964, 95% CI: 0.881-1.055, p = 0.421; for CC + TC vs. TT: OR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.880-1.053, p = 0.406; for CC vs. TT + TC: OR = 0.978, 95% CI: 0.831-1.15, p = 0.788). We also observed no obvious associations in the subgroup analyses by ethnicity (Caucasian) and source of controls (population based, PB) for all genetic models.Conclusions
Current evidence suggests that the COX-2 8473T>C polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer risk.
SUBMITTER: Jiang J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4269000 | biostudies-literature | 2014
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Jiang Jun J Quan Xun-Feng XF Zhang Li L Shen Li L Zhang Ming-Xia MX Ma Hui-Hui HH Wang Yi-Chun YC
Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) 20140618 3
<h4>Aim of the study</h4>Results of recent published studies on the association between the COX-2 8473T>C polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer have often been conflicting. To make a more precise estimation of the potential relationship, a meta-analysis was performed.<h4>Material and methods</h4>A total of seven case-control studies with 7,033 cases and 9,350 controls were included in the current meta-analysis through searching the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to Ma ...[more]