Identification of active chemotherapy regimens in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a review of chemotherapy trials in the past two decades.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ulahannan SV
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4326054 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6494548 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Although gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is considered as standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the optimal regimen remains unknown. Methods: Using Network meta-analysis (NMA), a systematic review was conducted to find the most effective chemotherapy regimen for advanced BTC. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for articles published before October 6, 2018. Articles about chemotherapeutic comparisons were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were estimated while odd ratios (ORs) was assessed for objective response rate (ORR). Results: The NMA included 25 studies and 3,312 individuals. Among all the regimens, Folfox-4 regimen obtained a superior difference in OS (BSC vs. Folfox-4, HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-6.7). XP was slightly better than GP in OS and GS approximately obtained the same efficacy to GP (HR for XP vs. GP 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-1.1; HR for GS vs. GP 1.1, 95% CI 0.71-1.5). Most of the targeted therapies included in this study tend to achieve better results in PFS and ORR but failed to improve OS, in which E-GEMOX achieved the best ORR when compared to BSC (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00-0.94). Conclusions: Folfox-4 regimen is likely to be the optimal chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC and the predominant targeted therapy hasn't achieved significant success currently. XP and GS can be considered as alternatives for advanced BTC.
| S-EPMC6549535 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as FGFR2 gene fusions, mutations of IDH1/2, HER2, BRAC1/2 and BRAF. Pembigatinib has become the first approved targeted therapy for BTC with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Recent immunotherapy has opened new therapy avenues in BTC with pembrolizumab approved for either microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors, including BTC. The combination of immunotherapy with other modalities is currently being evaluated in different clinical trials, since single agent immunotherapy appears to provide modest benefits in advanced BTC. In this review, we summarize the current status of treatment options, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations in advanced BTC.
| S-EPMC7519922 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chemotherapy is indispensable for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Recently, reports regarding first-line chemotherapy have increased, and first-line chemotherapy treatment has become gradually more sophisticated. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy (or gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination therapy) have become the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer. Oral fluoropyrimidines have also been shown to have good antitumor effects. Gemcitabine, platinum compounds, and oral fluoropyrimidines are now considered key drugs for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Several clinical trials using molecular targeted agents are also ongoing. Combination therapy using cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted agents has been evaluated widely. However, reports regarding second-line chemotherapy remain limited, and it has not yet been clarified whether second-line chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish second-line standard chemotherapy treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer. Several problems exist when assessing the results of previous reports concerning advanced biliary tract cancer. In the present review, the current status of the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer is summarized, and several associated problems are indicated. These problems should be solved to achieve more sophisticated treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.
| S-EPMC3759755 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMalignant tumors of the biliary system are characterized by a high degree of malignancy and strong invasiveness, and they are usually diagnosed at late stages with poor prognosis. For patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, chemotherapy and targeted therapy are two of the options available to improve prognosis and delay tumor progression. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various chemotherapy schemes for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer in published systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRoMAs).MethodsAn umbrella review method was adopted, which aims to summarize the existing evidence from multiple studies around a research topic. SRoMAs up to April 9, 2022, were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane database, and manual screening. Eligible studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study had been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022324548). For each eligible study, we extracted the data of general characteristics and the main findings. The methodological quality of the included studies were assessed by the AMSTAR2 scale, and the quality of evidence was evaluated by the GRADE tools.ResultsA total of 1833 articles were searched; 14 unique articles with 94 outcomes were identified by eligibility criteria. The incidence of skin rash (RR = 18.11, 95% CI 5.13-63.91, GRADE: Moderate) and diarrhea (RR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.2-5.10, GRADE: Moderate) was higher in patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy plus targeted therapy than in patients receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. The number of patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy who developed leukopenia (OR = 7.17, 95% CI 1.43-36.08, GRADE: Moderate), anemia (OR = 7.04, 95% CI 2.59-19.12, GRADE: High), thrombocytopenia (RR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.39-4.32, GRADE: Moderate), and neutropenia (RR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.04-10.50, GRADE: Moderate) was significantly higher than that of patients who received gemcitabine-free regimens. In addition, patients receiving S-1 monotherapy had significantly better ORR (RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.27-4.57, GRADE: Moderate) than patients receiving S-1 + gemcitabine. Patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy had longer OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.7-0.99, GRADE: Moderate), higher DCR (0R = 5.18, 95% CI 3.3-10.23, GRADE: Moderate), and higher ORR (0R = 3.24, 95% CI 1.18-8.92, GRADE: Moderate) compared with patients who received 5-FU/LV monotherapy or supportive therapy. Surprisingly, we found evidence that gemcitabine-based chemotherapy did not improve postoperative patients' OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.74-1.12, GRADE: Moderate) when compared with best supportive care.ConclusionsThis study comprehensively evaluated the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy or targeted therapy regimens for advanced biliary tract cancer and found 11 outcomes with "Moderate" or "High" levels; however, most of the outcomes were still at "low" or "very low" levels. More randomized controlled studies are needed in the future to further summarize high levels of evidence.
| S-EPMC10131316 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Systemic chemotherapy is one of the most important treatment modalities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Before the introduction of sorafenib, cytotoxic agents, hormonal therapies, or many combinations of these were the mainly used modalities for systemic chemotherapy of advanced HCC. However, such regimens were of only limited value in clinical practice, because some randomized controlled studies comparing promising regimens with no treatment or doxorubicin alone failed to show any overall survival advantage. In two pivotal phase III placebo-controlled studies, the SHARP trial and the Asia-Pacific trial, sorafenib was demonstrated to significantly delay the time to progression and the overall survival time in patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, sorafenib therapy has come to be acknowledged as a standard therapy for advanced HCC worldwide. After the introduction of sorafenib, a number of phase III trials of various molecular-targeted agents vs. sorafenib as first-line chemotherapy and of various molecular-targeted agents vs. placebo as second-line chemotherapy have been conducted to determine if any of these agents could offer a survival benefit, however, none of the agents examined so far has been demonstrated to provide any survival benefit over sorafenib or placebo. Recently, favorable treatment efficacies have been reported in some clinical trials of molecular-targeted agents in the biomarker-enriched population. Development of individualized cancer treatments using molecular-targeted agents based on the results of genome-sequencing is aggressively ongoing. Furthermore, immune-oncologic agents, such as anti-CTLA-4 antibody and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody, have been reported to provide promising outcomes. Thus, various novel systemic chemotherapeutic agents are currently under development, and further improvements in the treatment outcomes are expected.
| S-EPMC5548259 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe role of second-line chemotherapy (CT) is not established in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We investigated the outcome of aBTC patients treated with second-line CT and devised a prognostic model.MethodsBaseline clinical and laboratory data of 300 consecutive aBTC patients were collected and association with overall survival (OS) was investigated by multivariable Cox models.ResultsThe following parameters resulted independently associated with longer OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (P<0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.348; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.215-0.562), CA19.9 lower than median (P=0.013; HR, 0.574; 95% CI 0.370-0.891), progression-free survival after first-line CT ? 6 months (P=0.027; HR, 0.633; 95% CI 0.422-0.949) and previous surgery on primary tumour (P=0.027; HR, 0.609; 95% CI 0.392-0.945). We grouped the 249 patients with complete data available into three categories according to the number of fulfilled risk factors: median OS times for good-risk (zero to one factors), intermediate-risk (two factors) and poor-risk (three to four factors) groups were 13.1, 6.6 and 3.7 months, respectively (P<0.001).ConclusionsEasily available clinical and laboratory factors predict prognosis of aBTC patients undergoing second-line CT. This model allows individual patient-risk stratification and may help in treatment decision and trial design.
| S-EPMC4007244 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionLenvatinib, a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and fibroblast growth factor receptors, recently demonstrated a treatment effect in various tumors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) who had received ≥1 line of prior systemic anti-BTC therapy.MethodsThis open-label, single-arm study included adult (≥18 years) patients with histologically confirmed BTC. Efficacy and safety were evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.0). Changes in tumor biomarkers throughout the treatment period were recorded.Results41 patients received lenvatinib treatment. The ORR was 12% (95% CI: 1.7-22.7), with a median PFS of 3.8 months (95% CI: 1.3-6.3) and an OS of 11.4 months (95% CI: 6.6-16.2). Thirty-nine (95.1%) patients experienced ≥1 treatment-related adverse event. Decreasing carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level predicted tumor size reduction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a sensitivity of 77.7% and a specificity of 73.9%.ConclusionsLenvatinib which was individualized based on the patient's weight has promising clinical activity against advanced BTC and had an acceptable safety profile. Additionally, serum biomarkers and gene sequencing may hold the potential to guide our treatment.
| S-EPMC8928459 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Biliary tract cancers are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Two-thirds of these primary liver malignancies are diagnosed at advanced stages where therapeutic options are limited. Whereas several molecular targeted therapies emerge in biliary tract cancers, immunotherapy is still investigational, the only approved immunotherapy to date being the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab for the small fraction of patients with microsatellite-instable tumors. In microsatellite-stable, pre-treated biliary tract cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint blockade has a limited albeit often long-lasting clinical activity in a still ill-defined subgroup of patients. The identification of predictive biomarkers will allow a better selection of patients that may benefit from immunotherapy. Combinations of immunotherapies with each other, with chemotherapy or targeted molecular therapies are being investigated in early lines of therapy, including first-line.
| S-EPMC8036747 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gemcitabine combined with platinum/fluorouracil drugs is the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). We explored the safety and efficacy of toripalimab plus gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs. At a one-sided significance level of 0.025, a total of 50 patients could provide 80% power to show the efficacy at targeted progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months of 70% versus 40% for the combined treatment. This single-arm, phase II study enrolled 50 patients with advanced BTCs who previously received no systemic treatment. The regimen was as follows: toripalimab (240 mg, i.v., d1), gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2, i.v., d1 and d8), and S-1 (40-60 mg bid p.o., d1-14, Q21d). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. The associations between response with PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and genetic variations were explored. Patients were enrolled from January 2019 to August 2020, with a median follow-up time of 24.0 months (IQR: 4.3-31.0 months). The 6-month PFS rate was 62%. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.0-8.9 months), and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.6-18.4 months). Forty-nine patients completed the evaluation for tumor response. The ORR was 30.6% (95% CI: 17.2%-44.0%), and the disease control rate was 87.8% (95% CI: 78.2%-97.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (98.0%), neutropenia (92%), and anemia (86.0%). Grade III/IV TRAEs included leukopenia (38.0%), neutropenia (32%), skin rash (6%), anemia (2.0%), mucositis (2%), and immune-related colitis (2%). Among them, the grade III/IV immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were skin rash and colitis. In addition, biomarker analysis showed that negative PD-L1 expression and SMARCA4 mutation were significantly associated with worse survival outcomes, while no significant associations were observed for TP53, KRAS, or CDKN 2 A mutation as well as TMB. In conclusion, our data suggest that a regimen of toripalimab plus GS could improve PFS and OS with a good safety profile as a first-line treatment option for advanced BTC and warrants further verification.
| S-EPMC9125659 | biostudies-literature