Dataset Information

Assay reproducibility in clinical studies of plasma miRNA.

ABSTRACT: There are increasing reports of plasma miRNAs as biomarkers of human disease but few standards in methodologic reporting, leading to inconsistent data. We systematically reviewed plasma miRNA studies published between July 2013-June 2014 to assess methodology. Six parameters were investigated: time to plasma extraction, methods of RNA extraction, type of miRNA, quantification, cycle threshold (Ct) setting, and methods of statistical analysis. We compared these data with a proposed standard methodologic technique. Beginning with initial screening for 380 miRNAs using microfluidic array technology and validation in an additional cohort of patients, we compared 11 miRNAs that exhibited differential expression between 16 patients with benign colorectal neoplasms (advanced adenomas) and 16 patients without any neoplasm (controls). Plasma was isolated immediately, 12, 24, 48, or 72 h following phlebotomy. miRNA was extracted using two different techniques (Trizol LS with pre-amplification or modified miRNeasy). We performed Taqman-based RT-PCR assays for the 11 miRNAs with subsequent analyses using a variable Ct setting or a fixed Ct set at 0.01, 0.03, 0.05, or 0.5. Assays were performed in duplicate by two different operators. RNU6 was the internal reference. Systematic review yielded 74 manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria. One manuscript (1.4%) documented all 6 methodological parameters, while < 5% of studies listed Ct setting. In our proposed standard technique, plasma extraction ?12 h provided consistent ?Ct. miRNeasy extraction yielded higher miRNA concentrations and fewer non-expressed miRNAs compared to Trizol LS (1/704 miRNAs [0.14%] vs 109/704 miRNAs [15%], not expressed, respectively). A fixed Ct bar setting of 0.03 yielded the most reproducible data, provided that <10% miRNA were non-expressed. There was no significant intra-operator variability. There was significant inter-operator variation using Trizol LS extraction, while this was negligible using modified miRNeasy. For standardized reporting, we recommend plasma extraction ? 12 h, using modified miRNeasy extraction and utilizing a 0.03 Ct.

SUBMITTER: Rice J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4390277 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assay reproducibility in clinical studies of plasma miRNA.

Rice Jonathan J Roberts Henry H Burton James J Pan Jianmin J States Vanessa V Rai Shesh N SN Galandiuk Susan S

PloS one 20150408 4

There are increasing reports of plasma miRNAs as biomarkers of human disease but few standards in methodologic reporting, leading to inconsistent data. We systematically reviewed plasma miRNA studies published between July 2013-June 2014 to assess methodology. Six parameters were investigated: time to plasma extraction, methods of RNA extraction, type of miRNA, quantification, cycle threshold (Ct) setting, and methods of statistical analysis. We compared these data with a proposed standard metho ...[more]

PMID: 25853871

Similar Datasets

Project description:Accurate quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is critical for diagnosis of acute or chronic HCV infection, and for follow-up of virologic response during HCV targeted therapy. In the present study, traceability and reproducibility of a novel China-certified domestic Sansure HCV RNA diagnostic assay (Sansure, Changsha, Hunan, China) was evaluated and the clinical performance of this assay was also analyzed.Traceability of the Sansure HCV RNA assay to the WHO international standard for HCV (genotype 1a) was detected across multiple centers. Reproducibility, accuracy (the differences of observed average concentrations and expected concentrations) and precision were assessed using series dilutions of World HCV RNA performance panel WWHV303-02 (HCV-1b), WWHV303-04(HCV-2a), WWHV303-11(HCV-3a) and WWHV303-19 (HCV-6a). In addition, both Sansure HCV RNA and CAP/CTM HCV (Roche, Branchburg, NJ, USA) assays were used to detect HCV RNA in 346 EDTA anti-coagulated plasma samples from previous HCV-infected patients, during and after antiviral therapy.The Sansure assay showed good traceability by agreeing with the HCV-1a WHO standard across all five concentrations tested (25, 50, 100, 1000, 10,000 IU/ml). The differences between observed average concentrations and expected concentrations were all within 0.2 log10 IU/ml. HCV WWHV303 standards across 4 HCV genotypes (1b, 2a, 3a and 6a) were used for evaluation of reproducibility and the accuracy of the test were all within 0.2 log10 IU/ml. The inter-assay variations across the above 4 HCV genotypes were all less than 0.03 on each evaluated concentration, indicating good precision of Sansure HCV RNA assay. In clinical practice, concordant results were determined in 99.42% (344/346) samples (215 positive and 129 negative samples). Two specimens with negative HCV RNA results by Sansure assay were detected positive by CAP/CTM HCV test. Correlation analysis indicated a significantly positive correlation in detected HCV RNA concentrations (r = 0.9439, P < 0.0001). HCV RNA levels in 95.35% (205/215) specimens were within mean difference ± 1.96 SD as tested by both assays.With the advantages of traceability, reproducibility and lower price, Sansure HCV RNA assay represented an alternative option for HCV RNA detection in hospital and medical institution in China.

Project description:This study evaluated differences in the clinical appearance of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on plasma level and regulation of microRNAs (miRNA-29c, miRNA-21, and miRNA-155). The observational-analytical study with a cross-sectional design was conducted on 36 HCC patients and 36 healthy controls. The blood samples were collected from 2 Province Hospitals (Dr. Sardjito Hospital and Prof. Dr. Margono Soekarjo Hospital) for HCC and the Blood Bank Donor of the Indonesian Red Cross for 36 healthy controls. These blood samples were treated as follows: plasma isolation, RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, quantification by qRT-PCR using a sequence-specific forward primer, and normalization of miRNA using housekeeping-stably miRNA-16. There were only 27 HCC patients with complete clinical variables (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet count, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and cholinesterase (ChE)) that were able to analyses for regulation miRNAs based on its fold change expression miRNA target. All 27 HCC subjects were follow-up until 3-years of monitoring for their overall survival. The miRNA plasma expression was analyzed by Bio-Rad CFX 96 Manager software to determine the cycle of quantification, followed by the calculation of expression levels using Livak's methods. Data were analyzed using STATA 11.0, with a significant value of p<0.05. The miRNAs expression of HCC subjects were lower than that healthy control subjects in miRNA-29c (down-regulation 1.83-fold), higher than that healthy control subjects in miRNA 21 and miRNA-155 (up-regulation, 1.74-fold; 1.55-fold) respectively. NLR, CRP, ChE, and platelet count showed a significant difference in miRNA-29c regulation, though neutrophil count showed a significant difference in miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 regulation (p<0.05). Conclusion: Plasma biomarkers: miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 might be potential biomarkers as onco-miR in HCC subjects, while miRNA-29c might act as a tumor suppressor. Significant evidence was identified with clinical progression based on the regulation of miRNAs, which was consistent with miRNA -29c.

Dataset Information

Assay reproducibility in clinical studies of plasma miRNA.

Publications

Assay reproducibility in clinical studies of plasma miRNA.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets