Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

14 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Sound packing DNA: packing open circular DNA with low-intensity ultrasound.

ABSTRACT: Supercoiling DNA (folding DNA into a more compact molecule) from open circular forms requires significant bending energy. The double helix is coiled into a higher order helix form; thus it occupies a smaller footprint. Compact packing of DNA is essential to improve the efficiency of gene delivery, which has broad implications in biology and pharmaceutical research. Here we show that low-intensity pulsed ultrasound can pack open circular DNA into supercoil form. Plasmid DNA subjected to 5.4 mW/cm(2) intensity ultrasound showed significant (p-values <0.001) supercoiling compared to DNA without exposure to ultrasound. Radiation force induced from ultrasound and dragging force from the fluid are believed to be the main factors that cause supercoiling. This study provides the first evidence to show that low-intensity ultrasound can directly alter DNA topology. We anticipate our results to be a starting point for improved non-viral gene delivery.

SUBMITTER: Park D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4402968 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Tumor ablation using low-intensity ultrasound and sound excitable drug.

Project description:The cell membrane is a semi-fluid container that defines the boundary of cells, and provides an enclosed environment for vital biological processes. A sound excitable drug (SED) that is non-cytotoxic to cells is developed to disrupt the plasma membrane under gentle ultrasound insonation, 1MHz, 1W/cm2. The frequency and power density of insonation are within the physical therapy and medical imaging windows; thus the applied ultrasound is safe and not harmful to tissues. The insertion of SEDs into the plasma membrane is not toxic to cells; however, the intruding SEDs weaken the membrane's integrity. Under insonation, the ultrasound energy destabilized the SED disrupted membranes, resulting in membrane rupture and eventual cell death. In a xenograft breast tumor model, the SED alone or the ultrasound alone caused little adverse effects to tumor tissue, while the combined treatment triggered necrosis with a brief local insonation of 3min. The described sono-membrane rupture therapy could be a safe alternative to the currently used high-energy tissue ablation technology, which uses X-rays, gamma rays, electron beams, protons, or high-intensity focused ultrasound.

| S-EPMC5515481 | biostudies-literature

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Effects on the Human Blood Brain Barrier

Project description:Analysis of human peritumoral brain following a low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPU) mediated opening of the blood brain barrier, to enhance the delivery of systemic chemotherapies (paclitaxel or carboplatin).

2024-12-02 | GSE208074 | GEO

Low intensity ultrasound perturbs cytoskeleton dynamics.

Project description:Therapeutic ultrasound is widely employed in clinical applications but its mechanism of action remains unclear. Here we report prompt fluidization of a cell and dramatic acceleration of its remodeling dynamics when exposed to low intensity ultrasound. These physical changes are caused by very small strains (10(-5)) at ultrasonic frequencies (10(6) Hz), but are closely analogous to those caused by relatively large strains (10(-1)) at physiological frequencies (10(0) Hz). Moreover, these changes are reminiscent of rejuvenation and aging phenomena that are well-established in certain soft inert materials. As such, we suggest cytoskeletal fluidization together with resulting acceleration of cytoskeletal remodeling events as a mechanism contributing to the salutary effects of low intensity therapeutic ultrasound.

| S-EPMC3641826 | biostudies-literature

Identification of genes responsive to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells

Project description:Although LIPUS has been shown to enhance fracture healing, the underlying mechanism of LIPUS remains to be fully elucidated. Here, to understand the molecular mechanism underlying cellular responses to LIPUS, we investigated gene expression profiles in mouse MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells using a GeneChipM-BM-. system. The mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with LIPUS (30 mW/cm2) for 20 min, followed by culturing for 24 h at 37M-KM-^ZC. Mock-treated cells served as the control. Total RNA samples were prepared from the cells, and the quality of the RNA was analyzed using a Bioanalyzer 2100. Gene expression was monitored by an Affymetrix GeneChipM-BM-. system with a Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array. Sample preparation for array hybridization was carried out as described in the manufacturer's instructions.

2013-03-26 | E-GEOD-45487 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Identification of early response genes to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone marrow stromal cells

Project description:Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been applied as a therapeutic adjunct to promote fracture healing. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms by which LIPUS promotes bone fracture healing have not yet been fully elucidated. In the present study, the early response genes elicited by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were investigated using GeneChip® oligonucleotide microarrays.

2019-08-19 | GSE135935 | GEO

Identification of genes responsive to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells

2013-03-26 | GSE45487 | GEO

Osteocytes as main responders to Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for the treatment of fracture healing

Project description:Skeletal tissue is known to respond to mechanical stress. Ultrasound stimulation is one of mechanical stress and low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) devices have been clinically utilized to promote the fracture healing. However, it is still not clear which skeletal cells, especially osteocytes or osteoblasts, mainly respond to LIPUS stimulation and how they contribute to fracture healing. To examine that, we utilized medaka known to have bones without embedded osteocytes and zebrafish known to have bones with embedded osteocytes as an in vivo model. Interestingly, fracture healing was accelerated by ultrasound stimulation in zebrafish but not in medaka. To examine the molecular events induced by LIPUS stimulation in osteocyte, we performed RNA-sequencing with the murine long bone osteocyte Y4 (MLO-Y4) cell line exposed to LIPUS. 179 genes reacted to LIPUS stimulation and functional cluster analysis defined that several molecular signatures related in immunity, secretion and transcription. Especially, most of isolated transcription related genes were modulated by LIPUS also in vivo experiments using zebrafish. Target genes analysis showed that inflammatory response and bone formation in fracture healing could be transcriptionally regulated in osteocytes by LIPUS stimulation. Among these transcription genes, early growth response (Egr) 1,2, JunB, Forkhead box Q1 (FoxQ1) and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) c1 were not altered by LIPUS in medaka unlike zebrafish suggesting that these genes would be key transcriptional regulator of LIPUS-dependent fracture healing through osteocytes. In this study, we revealed bone-equipped osteocytes is necessary for LIPUS-induced promotion of fracture healing through the transcriptional control of target genes presumably to activate neighboring cells involved in fracture healing event.

2021-05-03 | GSE162674 | GEO

Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound.

Project description:Possessing the ability to noninvasively elicit brain circuit activity yields immense experimental and therapeutic power. Most currently employed neurostimulation methods rely on the somewhat invasive use of stimulating electrodes or photon-emitting devices. Due to its ability to noninvasively propagate through bone and other tissues in a focused manner, the implementation of ultrasound (US) represents a compelling alternative approach to current neuromodulation strategies. Here, we investigated the influence of low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound (LILFU) on neuronal activity. By transmitting US waveforms through hippocampal slice cultures and ex vivo mouse brains, we determined LILFU is capable of remotely and noninvasively exciting neurons and network activity. Our results illustrate that LILFU can stimulate electrical activity in neurons by activating voltage-gated sodium channels, as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. The LILFU-induced changes in neuronal activity were sufficient to trigger SNARE-mediated exocytosis and synaptic transmission in hippocampal circuits. Because LILFU can stimulate electrical activity and calcium signaling in neurons as well as central synaptic transmission we conclude US provides a powerful tool for remotely modulating brain circuit activity.

| S-EPMC2568804 | biostudies-literature

A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound for neuromodulation.

Project description:The ability of ultrasound to be focused into a small region of interest through the intact skull within the brain has led researchers to investigate its potential therapeutic uses for functional neurosurgery and tumor ablation. Studies have used high-intensity focused ultrasound to ablate tissue in localised brain regions for movement disorders and chronic pain while sparing the overlying and surrounding tissue. More recently, low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) that induces reversible biological effects has been emerged as an alternative neuromodulation modality due to its bi-modal (i.e. excitation and suppression) capability with exquisite spatial specificity and depth penetration. Many compelling evidences of LIFU-mediated neuromodulatory effects including behavioral responses, electrophysiological recordings and functional imaging data have been found in the last decades. LIFU, therefore, has the enormous potential to improve the clinical outcomes as well as to replace the currently available neuromodulation techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial current stimulation. In this paper, we aim to provide a summary of pioneering studies in the field of ultrasonic neuromodulation including its underlying mechanisms that were published in the last 60 years. In closing, some of potential clinical applications of ultrasonic brain stimulation will be discussed.

| S-EPMC6208465 | biostudies-literature

Frequency sensitive mechanism in low-intensity ultrasound enhanced bioeffects.

Project description:This study presents two novel theoretical models to elucidate frequency sensitive nuclear mechanisms in low-intensity ultrasound enhanced bioeffects. In contrast to the typical 1.5 MHz pulsed ultrasound regime, our group previously experimentally confirmed that ultrasound stimulation of anchored chondrocytes at resonant frequency maximized gene expression of load inducible genes which are regulatory markers for cellular response to external stimuli. However, ERK phosphorylation displayed no frequency dependency, suggesting that the biochemical mechanisms involved in enhanced gene expression is downstream of ERK phosphorylation. To elucidate such underlying mechanisms, this study presents a theoretical model of an anchored cell, representing an in vitro chondrocyte, in an ultrasound field. The model results showed that the mechanical energy storage is maximized at the chondrocyte's resonant frequency and the energy density in the nucleus is almost twice as high as in the cytoplasm. Next, a mechanochemical model was developed to link the mechanical stimulation of ultrasound and the increased mechanical energy density in the nucleus to the downstream targets of the ERK pathway. This study showed for the first time that ultrasound stimulation induces frequency dependent gene expression as a result of altered rates of transcription factors binding to chromatin.

| S-EPMC5538718 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data