Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Chondral Defects With Bone Marrow Stimulation and BST-CarGel.

ABSTRACT: Microfracture, the current standard of care for the treatment of non-degenerative chondral lesions in the hip joint, is limited by the poor quality of the filling fibrocartilaginous tissue. BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Laval, Quebec, Canada) is a chitosan-based biopolymer that, when mixed with fresh, autologous whole blood and placed over the previously microfractured area, stabilizes the blood clot and enhances marrow-triggered wound-healing repair processes. BST-CarGel has been previously applied in the knee, with statistically significant greater lesion filling and superior repair tissue quality compared with microfracture treatment alone. In this report we describe the application of BST-CarGel for the arthroscopic treatment of hip chondral lesions. Our preliminary data suggest that our BST-CarGel procedure provides high-quality repair tissue and therefore may be considered a safe, cost-efficient therapeutic choice for the treatment of hip chondral defects.

SUBMITTER: Tey M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4427612 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Chondral Defects With Bone Marrow Stimulation and BST-CarGel.

Tey Marc M Mas Jesús J Pelfort Xavier X Monllau Joan Carles JC

Arthroscopy techniques 20150119 1

Microfracture, the current standard of care for the treatment of non-degenerative chondral lesions in the hip joint, is limited by the poor quality of the filling fibrocartilaginous tissue. BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Laval, Quebec, Canada) is a chitosan-based biopolymer that, when mixed with fresh, autologous whole blood and placed over the previously microfractured area, stabilizes the blood clot and enhances marrow-triggered wound-healing repair processes. BST-CarGel has been previousl ...[more]

PMID: 25973370

Similar Datasets

Project description:Acetabular cartilage lesions are a common abnormality found in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery and may cause pain and functional limitations. Several strategies have been developed to treat chondral defects, with no overwhelming success. Recently, BST-CarGel has gained interest as a scaffolding material that can be injected into the microfracture site to stabilize the clot and facilitate cartilage repair.To perform a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to evaluate the safety profile and short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated arthroscopically with BST-CarGel for acetabular chondral defects in conjunction with microfracture.Case series; Level of evidence, 4.A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery by the senior surgeon to identify those who had BST-CarGel applied to their hip from November 2014 to July 2016, and basic demographic information for those patients was obtained. Operative reports and patient charts were reviewed to assess intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as to obtain the details of surgery, including lesion size and treatment method of the labrum (repair vs reconstruction). All patients filled out self-reported questionnaires, including the international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Profile (HOS-SP) at the time of consultation and at 1 year postoperatively, and results were used to assess the clinical outcomes of surgery.Thirty-seven patients (37 hips) with a mean age of 36.19 years at the time of the index procedure were evaluated. There were 30 male patients, and 20 procedures were performed on the right hip. The minimum follow-up was 1 year, with a mean follow-up of 12.72 months. There were no major adverse events of deep vein thrombosis, blood vessel or nerve damage, hemarthrosis, arthralgia, or device-related adverse events. Two patients (5.4%) were readmitted because of pain, probably resulting from an inflammatory reaction to BST-CarGel. At 1 year postoperatively, there were statistically significant improvements in the iHOT (40.4 to 59.1; P < .001), HOS-ADL (60.6 to 71.4; P = .02), and HOS-SP (36.9 to 51.6; P = .01) scores. When the patients were subdivided based on the chondral defect size, the iHOT score improved for all chondral defect sizes, and the HOS-SP score improved in patients with medium (2-4 cm2) and very large (>6 cm2) chondral defects. In addition, the iHOT score improved whether the patients had their labrum repaired or reconstructed (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively).The arthroscopic treatment of chondral acetabular defects with BST-CarGel demonstrates a satisfactory safety profile, with statistically significant improvement in patient-reported clinical outcome scores, even for those with very large chondral defect sizes.

Project description:PurposeTo compare the outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of focal chondral defects (FCDs) of the knee joint with chondroplasty versus bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and cartilage-derived matrix (CDM) implantation.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with Outerbridge grade 3-4 FCDs. Patients were included if they were treated arthroscopically with BMAC/CDM implantation or chondroplasty alone between March 2016 and May 2019 and had more than 1-year follow-up. Postoperative outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores; Knee Outcome Survey (KOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports subscores; postoperative corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections; subsequent surgeries; and conversion to total knee arthroplasty.ResultsA total of 98 patients were identified with a mean follow-up in BMAC/CDM of 24 months (range 13-41 months) and in chondroplasty of 44 months (range 34-55 months). A subanalysis was performed to control for significant differences in age, which yielded 39 patients, ages 40-60 years. Within the subanalysis group, mean VAS scores were significantly lower in the BMAC/CDM group (1.7 vs 4.4; P = .005) and mean UCLA scores were significantly greater (7.1 vs 5.0; P = .002). Mean improvement in VAS and UCLA scores were similar between the BMAC/CDM and chondroplasty groups (-3.7 vs -1.3; P = .71, 1.9 vs 0.1; P = .14, respectively). Mean KOS ADL and Sports subscores were significantly greater among patients in the BMAC/CDM group (87% vs 55%; P = .001, 71% vs 41%; P = .002, respectively). There were no differences in postoperative injections, subsequent surgeries, or conversion to total knee arthroplasty between the BMAC/CDM and chondroplasty groups.ConclusionsPatients with grade 3-4 FCDs of the knee had improved postoperative outcomes when treated with BMAC/CDM implantation versus chondroplasty alone, as evidenced by a significant improvement in VAS and UCLA scores and significantly greater postoperative KOS ADL, and KOS Sport subscores.Level of evidenceIV, therapeutic case series.

Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Chondral Defects With Bone Marrow Stimulation and BST-CarGel.

Publications

Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Chondral Defects With Bone Marrow Stimulation and BST-CarGel.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets