Dataset Information

Exploring the Major Sources and Extent of Heterogeneity in a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Genome-wide association (GWA) meta-analysis has become a popular approach for discovering genetic variants responsible for complex diseases. The between-study heterogeneity effect is a severe issue that may complicate the interpretation of results. Aiming to improve the interpretation of meta-analysis results, we empirically explored the extent and source of heterogeneity effect. We analyzed a previously reported GWA meta-analysis of obesity, in which over 21,000 subjects from seven individual samples were meta-analyzed. We first evaluated the extent and distribution of heterogeneity across the entire genome. We then studied the effects of several potentially confounding factors, including age, ethnicity, gender composition, study type, and genotype imputation on heterogeneity with a random-effects meta-regression model. Of the total 4,325,550 SNPs being tested, heterogeneity was moderate to very large for 25.4% of the total SNPs. Heterogeneity was more severe in SNPs with stronger association signals. Ethnicity, average age, and genotype imputation accuracy had significant effects on the heterogeneity. Exploring the effects of ethnicity can provide clues to the potential ethnic-specific effects for two loci known to affect obesity, MC4R, and MTCH2. Our analysis can help to clarify understanding of the obesity mechanism and may provide guidance for an effective design of future GWA meta-analysis.

SUBMITTER: Pei YF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4761279 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring the Major Sources and Extent of Heterogeneity in a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis.

Pei Yu-Fang YF Tian Qing Q Zhang Lei L Deng Hong-Wen HW

Annals of human genetics 20151220 2

Genome-wide association (GWA) meta-analysis has become a popular approach for discovering genetic variants responsible for complex diseases. The between-study heterogeneity effect is a severe issue that may complicate the interpretation of results. Aiming to improve the interpretation of meta-analysis results, we empirically explored the extent and source of heterogeneity effect. We analyzed a previously reported GWA meta-analysis of obesity, in which over 21,000 subjects from seven individual s ...[more]

PMID: 26686198

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is the systematic and quantitative synthesis of effect sizes and the exploration of their diversity across different studies. Meta-analyses are increasingly applied to synthesize data from genome-wide association (GWA) studies and from other teams that try to replicate the genetic variants that emerge from such investigations. Between-study heterogeneity is important to document and may point to interesting leads. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To exemplify these issues, we used data from three GWA studies on type 2 diabetes and their replication efforts where meta-analyses of all data using fixed effects methods (not incorporating between-study heterogeneity) have already been published. We considered 11 polymorphisms that at least one of the three teams has suggested as susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. The I2 inconsistency metric (measuring the amount of heterogeneity not due to chance) was different from 0 (no detectable heterogeneity) for 6 of the 11 genetic variants; inconsistency was moderate to very large (I2 = 32-77%) for 5 of them. For these 5 polymorphisms, random effects calculations incorporating between-study heterogeneity revealed more conservative p-values for the summary effects compared with the fixed effects calculations. These 5 associations were perused in detail to highlight potential explanations for between-study heterogeneity. These include identification of a marker for a correlated phenotype (e.g. FTO rs8050136 being associated with type 2 diabetes through its effect on obesity); differential linkage disequilibrium across studies of the identified genetic markers with the respective culprit polymorphisms (e.g., possibly the case for CDKAL1 polymorphisms or for rs9300039 and markers in linkage disequilibrium, as shown by additional studies); and potential bias. Results were largely similar, when we treated the discovery and replication data from each GWA investigation as separate studies. SIGNIFICANCE: Between-study heterogeneity is useful to document in the synthesis of data from GWA investigations and can offer valuable insights for further clarification of gene-disease associations.

Project description:IMPORTANCE:Neuroticism is a pervasive risk factor for psychiatric conditions. It genetically overlaps with major depressive disorder (MDD) and is therefore an important phenotype for psychiatric genetics. The Genetics of Personality Consortium has created a resource for genome-wide association analyses of personality traits in more than 63,000 participants (including MDD cases). OBJECTIVES:To identify genetic variants associated with neuroticism by performing a meta-analysis of genome-wide association results based on 1000 Genomes imputation; to evaluate whether common genetic variants as assessed by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) explain variation in neuroticism by estimating SNP-based heritability; and to examine whether SNPs that predict neuroticism also predict MDD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 30 cohorts with genome-wide genotype, personality, and MDD data from the Genetics of Personality Consortium. The study included 63,661 participants from 29 discovery cohorts and 9786 participants from a replication cohort. Participants came from Europe, the United States, or Australia. Analyses were conducted between 2012 and 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Neuroticism scores harmonized across all 29 discovery cohorts by item response theory analysis, and clinical MDD case-control status in 2 of the cohorts. RESULTS:A genome-wide significant SNP was found on 3p14 in MAGI1 (rs35855737; P?=?9.26?×?10-9 in the discovery meta-analysis). This association was not replicated (P?=?.32), but the SNP was still genome-wide significant in the meta-analysis of all 30 cohorts (P?=?2.38?×?10-8). Common genetic variants explain 15% of the variance in neuroticism. Polygenic scores based on the meta-analysis of neuroticism in 27 cohorts significantly predicted neuroticism (1.09?×?10-12?<?P?<?.05) and MDD (4.02?×?10-9?<?P?<?.05) in the 2 other cohorts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:This study identifies a novel locus for neuroticism. The variant is located in a known gene that has been associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in previous studies. In addition, the study shows that neuroticism is influenced by many genetic variants of small effect that are either common or tagged by common variants. These genetic variants also influence MDD. Future studies should confirm the role of the MAGI1 locus for neuroticism and further investigate the association of MAGI1 and the polygenic association to a range of other psychiatric disorders that are phenotypically correlated with neuroticism.

Dataset Information

Exploring the Major Sources and Extent of Heterogeneity in a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Exploring the Major Sources and Extent of Heterogeneity in a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets