Dataset Information

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Safety Analysis of Superficial Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive or Adjuvant Radiotherapy

ABSTRACT:

Simple Summary

For superficial esophageal cancer, many tumor features have been identified as risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including depth of invasion, tumor size, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, etc. In such cases, endoscopic resection (ER) alone is not adequate for treatment coverage, and additional radiotherapy (RT)/concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) merits further investigation. On the other hand, esophagectomy has a high cure rate for early stage esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC); however, there are concerns of treatment complications and loss of esophagus preservation. Hence, definitive RT/CCRT may be a promising treatment alternative to esophagectomy, especially for those who are unable or unwilling to receive surgery. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients with T1N0M0 staged ESCC treated with ER + RT/CCRT or RT/CCRT. We conclude that definitive or adjuvant RT/CCRT is an effective treatment alternative for superficial ESCC patients with satisfactory clinical outcomes and acceptable toxicities.

Abstract

(1) Background: The role of radiotherapy (RT) in superficial esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) remains unclear. The objective of our study was to perform a detailed outcome and safety analysis of RT as a definitive or adjuvant treatment for T1N0M0 staged ESCC patients. (2) Methods: A total of 55 patients treated with endoscopic resection (ER) + RT/concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or RT/CCRT from January 2011 to June 2021 were included in this study. Eighteen patients with risk factors received ER + RT/CCRT, and thirty-seven patients solely received RT/CCRT. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to calculate the clinical outcomes, and toxicities were scored. (3) Results: The median follow-up time was 51.9 months. The estimated 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88.9% and 94.4% in the ER + RT/CCRT group and 91.8% and 91.7% in the RT/CCRT group. The predominant failure pattern was in-field local failure (5.5%, 3/55), with one patient in the ER + RT/CCRT group and two patients in the RT/CCRT group. One patient (1.8%, 1/55) had lung metastasis in the RT/CCRT group. The most common toxicities were Grades 1–2 in all patients, including esophagitis (74.5%, 41/55), myelosuppression (49.1%, 27/55) and esophageal stricture after RT (27.3%, 15/55). Two patients (11.1%, 2/18) and four patients (10.8%, 4/37) had Grade 3 esophageal stricture after RT in the ER + RT/CCRT group and RT/CCRT group, respectively. No patients experienced a Grade 4 or higher toxicity, and there were no treatment-related deaths. (4) Conclusions: Definitive or adjuvant RT/CCRT is an effective treatment alternative for superficial ESCC patients with satisfactory clinical outcomes and acceptable toxicities.

SUBMITTER: Lyu B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9322572 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDefinitive radiotherapy has become a more common treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC), but data about long-term clinical outcomes is still relatively sparse. The purpose of this study was to describe long-term clinical outcomes after definitive radiotherapy for CESCC, and identify the prognostic factors influencing these outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients who received definitive radiotherapy for CESCC at our institution between 2006 and 2014. The overall survival (OS) rate, locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) rate, and toxicities were retrospectively evaluated during long-term follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 120 patients were included for analysis. The median prescribed radiation dose for the gross tumor and metastatic lymph nodes was 60 Gy. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was performed on 99 patients (83%); 90 patients (75%) received concurrent chemotherapy. The OS rates were 22.7% at 5 years and 14.9% at 8 years. The LRFFS rates at 3, 5, and 8 years were 27.5%, 21.7%, and 15.0%, respectively. The univariate analysis suggested that N classification and non-regional lymph node metastasis (M1Lym) status were independent risk factors for overall survival (P<0.01). A dose of more than 60 Gy didn't have a statistically significant influence in the multivariate analysis, although a total dose of more than 60 Gy was associated with improved survival in the univariate analysis. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with OS or LRFFS time in the univariate or multivariate analysis. A total of 74 patients (61.7%) experienced locoregional treatment failure. The most commonly documented acute toxicities were grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities in 61 patients (50.8%). There were 2 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism as a late toxicity event.ConclusionsDefinitive radiotherapy is a reasonable curative treatment option with laryngopharyngeal preservation for CESCC patients. Radical treatments for lymph node metastases may improve the OS and LRFFS times. Monitoring for thyroid function may be warranted during long-term follow-up.

Project description:PurposeAlthough 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is the worldwide standard for the treatment of esophageal cancer, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves dose conformality and reduces the radiation exposure to normal tissues. We hypothesized that the dosimetric advantages of IMRT should translate to substantive benefits in clinical outcomes compared with 3D-CRT.Methods and materialsAn analysis was performed of 676 nonrandomized patients (3D-CRT, n=413; IMRT, n=263) with stage Ib-IVa (American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002) esophageal cancers treated with chemoradiotherapy at a single institution from 1998-2008. An inverse probability of treatment weighting and inclusion of propensity score (treatment probability) as a covariate were used to compare overall survival time, interval to local failure, and interval to distant metastasis, while accounting for the effects of other clinically relevant covariates. The propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression analysis.ResultsA fitted multivariate inverse probability weighted-adjusted Cox model showed that the overall survival time was significantly associated with several well-known prognostic factors, along with the treatment modality (IMRT vs 3D-CRT, hazard ratio 0.72, P<.001). Compared with IMRT, 3D-CRT patients had a significantly greater risk of dying (72.6% vs 52.9%, inverse probability of treatment weighting, log-rank test, P<.0001) and of locoregional recurrence (P=.0038). No difference was seen in cancer-specific mortality (Gray's test, P=.86) or distant metastasis (P=.99) between the 2 groups. An increased cumulative incidence of cardiac death was seen in the 3D-CRT group (P=.049), but most deaths were undocumented (5-year estimate, 11.7% in 3D-CRT vs 5.4% in IMRT group, Gray's test, P=.0029).ConclusionsOverall survival, locoregional control, and noncancer-related death were significantly better after IMRT than after 3D-CRT. Although these results need confirmation, IMRT should be considered for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Project description:BackgroundObservational data has indicated improved survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) compared with definitive radiotherapy (RT) in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).ObjectiveTo compare PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) in men with high-risk PCa treated with RP or RT, providing information on target doses and fractionations.Design setting and participantsThis is an observational study from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Patients were diagnosed with high-risk PCa during 2006-2015, treated with RP ≤12 mo or RT ≤15 mo after diagnosis, and stratified according to RP or RT modality; external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 70-<74, 74-<78, or 78 Gy), hypofractionated RT or EBRT combined with brachytherapy (BT-RT).Outcome measurements and statistical analysisCompeting risk and Kaplan-Meier methods estimated PCSM and OM, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated hazard ratios (HRs) for PCSM and OM.Results and limitationsIn total, 9254 patients were included (RP 47%, RT 53%). RT patients were older, had poorer performance status and more unfavorable disease characteristics. With a median follow-up time of seven and eight yrs, the overall 10-yr PCSM was 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-8.0) and OM was 22.9% (95% CI 21.8-24.1). Compared with RP, EBRT 70-<74 Gy was associated with increased (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.33-2.65, p < 0.001) and BT-RT with decreased (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.96, p = 0.039) 10-yr PCSM. Patients treated with EBRT 70-78 Gy had higher adjusted 10-yr OM than those treated with RP.ConclusionsIn men with high-risk PCa, treatment with EBRT <74 Gy was associated with increased adjusted 10-yr PCSM and OM, and BT-RT with decreased 10-yr PCSM, compared with RP.Patient summaryIn this study, we compared mortality after radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa); the results suggest that men receiving lower-dose RT have higher, and patients receiving brachytherapy may have lower, risk of death from PCa than patients treated with prostatectomy.

Dataset Information

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Safety Analysis of Superficial Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive or Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Simple Summary

Abstract

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets