Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

11 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Toxicity-dependent feasibility bounds for the escalation with overdose control approach in phase I cancer trials.

ABSTRACT: Phase I trials of anti-cancer therapies aim to identify a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as the dose that causes unacceptable toxicity in a target proportion of patients. Both rule-based and model-based methods have been proposed for MTD recommendation. The escalation with overdose control (EWOC) approach is a model-based design where the dose assigned to the next patient is one that, given all available data, has a posterior probability of exceeding the MTD equal to a pre-specified value known as the feasibility bound. The aim is to conservatively dose-escalate and approach the MTD, avoiding severe overdosing early on in a trial. The EWOC approach has been applied in practice with the feasibility bound either fixed or varying throughout a trial, yet some of the methods may recommend incoherent dose-escalation, that is, an increase in dose after observing severe toxicity at the current dose. We present examples where varying feasibility bounds have been used in practice, and propose a toxicity-dependent feasibility bound approach that guarantees coherent dose-escalation and incorporates the desirable features of other EWOC approaches. We show via detailed simulation studies that the toxicity-dependent feasibility bound approach provides improved MTD recommendation properties to the original EWOC approach for both discrete and continuous doses across most dose-toxicity scenarios, with comparable performance to other approaches without recommending incoherent dose escalation. © 2017 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

SUBMITTER: Wheeler GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5462100 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Dose finding with drug combinations in cancer phase I clinical trials using conditional escalation with overdose control.

Project description:We present a Bayesian adaptive design for dose finding of a combination of two drugs in cancer phase I clinical trials. The goal is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as a curve in the two-dimensional Cartesian plane. We use a logistic model to describe the relationship between the doses of the two agents and the probability of dose limiting toxicity. The model is re-parameterized in terms of parameters clinicians can easily interpret. Trial design proceeds using univariate escalation with overdose control, where at each stage of the trial, we seek a dose of one agent using the current posterior distribution of the MTD of this agent given the current dose of the other agent. At the end of the trial, an estimate of the MTD curve is proposed as a function of Bayes estimates of the model parameters. We evaluate design operating characteristics in terms of safety of the trial design and percent of dose recommendation at dose combination neighborhoods around the true MTD curve. We also examine the performance of the approach under model misspecifications for the true dose-toxicity relationship.

| S-EPMC4156522 | biostudies-literature

Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules.

Project description:BackgroundConventional methods for phase I dose-escalation trials in oncology are based on a single treatment schedule only. More recently, however, multiple schedules are more frequently investigated in the same trial.MethodsHere, we consider sequential phase I trials, where the trial proceeds with a new schedule (e.g. daily or weekly dosing) once the dose escalation with another schedule has been completed. The aim is to utilize the information from both the completed and the ongoing schedules to inform decisions on the dose level for the next dose cohort. For this purpose, we adapted the time-to-event pharmacokinetics (TITE-PK) model, which were originally developed for simultaneous investigation of multiple schedules. TITE-PK integrates information from multiple schedules using a pharmacokinetics (PK) model.ResultsIn a simulation study, the developed approach is compared to the bridging continual reassessment method and the Bayesian logistic regression model using a meta-analytic-predictive prior. TITE-PK results in better performance than comparators in terms of recommending acceptable dose and avoiding overly toxic doses for sequential phase I trials in most of the scenarios considered. Furthermore, better performance of TITE-PK is achieved while requiring similar number of patients in the simulated trials. For the scenarios involving one schedule, TITE-PK displays similar performance with alternatives in terms of acceptable dose recommendations. The R and Stan code for the implementation of an illustrative sequential phase I trial example in oncology is publicly available ( https://github.com/gunhanb/TITEPK_sequential ).ConclusionIn phase I oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules, the use of all relevant information is of great importance. For these trials, the adapted TITE-PK which combines information using PK principles is recommended.

| S-EPMC8045405 | biostudies-literature

TEAMS: Toxicity- and Efficacy-based Dose Insertion Design with Adaptive Model Selection for Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Trials in Oncology.

Project description:In many oncology clinical trials it is necessary to insert new candidate doses when the prespecified doses are poorly elicited. Formal statistical designs with dose insertion are lacking. We propose a dose insertion design for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes. We also implement Bayesian model selection during the course of the trial so that better models can be adaptively chosen to achieve more accurate inference. The new design, TEAMS, achieves great operating characteristics in extensive simulation studies due to its ability to adaptively insert new doses as well as perform model selection. As a result, appropriate doses are inserted when necessary and desirable doses are selected with higher probabilities at the end of the trial.

| S-EPMC4627719 | biostudies-literature

Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method.

Project description:The Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) design for cancer dose finding clinical trials is a variation of the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) that was proposed to overcome the limitation of the original CRM of exposing patients to high toxic doses. The properties of EWOC have been studied to some extent, but some aspects of the design are not well studied, and its performance is not fully understood. Comparisons of the EWOC design to the most commonly used modified CRM designs have not yet been performed, and the advantages of EWOC over the modified CRM designs are unclear. In this paper, we assess the properties of the EWOC design and of the restricted CRM and some variations of these designs. We show that EWOC has several weaknesses that CRM does not have that make it impractical to use in its original formulation. We propose modified EWOC designs that address some of the weaknesses and that have some desirable statistical properties compared with the original EWOC design, the restricted CRM design, and the 3 + 3 design. However, their statistical properties are sensitive to correct specification of the prior distribution of their parameters and hence nevertheless will need to be used with some caution. The restricted CRM design is shown to have more stable performance across a wider family of dose-toxicity curves than EWOC and therefore may be a preferable general choice in cancer clinical research.

| S-EPMC8932137 | biostudies-literature

A Bayesian model-free approach to combination therapy phase I trials using censored time-to-toxicity data.

Project description:The product of independent beta probabilities escalation (PIPE) design for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation trials is a Bayesian model-free approach for identifying multiple maximum tolerated dose combinations of novel combination therapies. Despite only being published in 2015, the PIPE design has been implemented in at least two oncology trials. However, these trials require patients to have completed follow-up before clinicians can make dose-escalation decisions. For trials of radiotherapy or advanced therapeutics, this may lead to impractically long trial durations due to late-onset treatment-related toxicities. In this paper, we extend the PIPE design to use censored time-to-event (TITE) toxicity outcomes for making dose escalation decisions. We show via comprehensive simulation studies and sensitivity analyses that trial duration can be reduced by up to 35%, particularly when recruitment is faster than expected, without compromising on other operating characteristics.

| S-EPMC6420054 | biostudies-literature

GUIP1: a R package for dose escalation strategies in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Project description:BackgroundThe main objective of phase I cancer clinical trials is to identify the maximum tolerated dose, usually defined as the highest dose associated with an acceptable level of severe toxicity during the first cycle of treatment. Several dose-escalation designs based on mathematical modeling of the dose-toxicity relationship have been developed. The main ones are: the continual reassessment method (CRM), the escalation with overdose control (EWOC) method and, for late-onset and cumulative toxicities, the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM) and the time-to-event escalation with overdose control (TITE-EWOC) methods. The objective of this work was to perform a user-friendly R package that combines the latter model-guided adaptive designs.ResultsGUIP1 is an R Graphical User Interface for dose escalation strategies in Phase 1 cancer clinical trials. It implements the CRM (based on Bayesian or maximum likelihood estimation), EWOC and TITE-CRM methods using the dfcrm and bcrm R packages, while the TITE-EWOC method has been specifically developed. The program is built using the TCL/TK programming language, which can be compiled via R software libraries (tcltk, tkrplot, tcltk2). GUIP1 offers the possibility of simulating and/or conducting and managing phase I clinical trials in real-time using file management options with automatic backup of study and/or simulation results.ConclusionsGUIP1 is implemented using the software R, which is widely used by statisticians in oncology. This package simplifies the use of the main model-based dose escalation methods and is designed to be fairly simple for beginners in R. Furthermore, it offers multiple possibilities such as a full traceability of the study. By including multiple innovative adaptive methods in a free and user-friendly program, we hope that GUIP1 will promote and facilitate their use in designing future phase I cancer clinical trials.

| S-EPMC7469913 | biostudies-literature

A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.

Project description:Dual-agent trials are now increasingly common in oncology research, and many proposed dose-escalation designs are available in the statistical literature. Despite this, the translation from statistical design to practical application is slow, as has been highlighted in single-agent phase I trials, where a 3 + 3 rule-based design is often still used. To expedite this process, new dose-escalation designs need to be not only scientifically beneficial but also easy to understand and implement by clinicians. In this paper, we propose a curve-free (nonparametric) design for a dual-agent trial in which the model parameters are the probabilities of toxicity at each of the dose combinations. We show that it is relatively trivial for a clinician's prior beliefs or historical information to be incorporated in the model and updating is fast and computationally simple through the use of conjugate Bayesian inference. Monotonicity is ensured by considering only a set of monotonic contours for the distribution of the maximum tolerated contour, which defines the dose-escalation decision process. Varied experimentation around the contour is achievable, and multiple dose combinations can be recommended to take forward to phase II. Code for R, Stata and Excel are available for implementation.

| S-EPMC4409822 | biostudies-literature

Microglia Control Escalation of Drinking in Alcohol-Dependent Mice: Genomic and Synaptic Drivers.

Project description:BackgroundMicroglia, the primary immune cells of the brain, are implicated in alcohol use disorder. However, it is not known if microglial activation contributes to the transition from alcohol use to alcohol use disorder or is a consequence of alcohol intake.MethodsWe investigated the role of microglia in a mouse model of alcohol dependence using a colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor (PLX5622) to deplete microglia and a chronic intermittent ethanol vapor two-bottle choice drinking procedure. Additionally, we examined anxiety-like behavior during withdrawal. We then analyzed synaptic neuroadaptations in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and gene expression changes in the medial prefrontal cortex and CeA from the same animals used for behavioral studies.ResultsPLX5622 prevented escalations in voluntary alcohol intake and decreased anxiety-like behavior associated with alcohol dependence. PLX5622 also reversed expression changes in inflammatory-related genes and glutamatergic and GABAergic (gamma-aminobutyric acidergic) genes in the medial prefrontal cortex and CeA. At the cellular level in these animals, microglia depletion reduced inhibitory GABAA and excitatory glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the CeA, supporting the hypothesis that microglia regulate dependence-induced changes in neuronal function.ConclusionsOur multifaceted approach is the first to link microglia to the molecular, cellular, and behavioral changes associated with the development of alcohol dependence, suggesting that microglia may also be critical for the development and progression of alcohol use disorder.

| S-EPMC7674270 | biostudies-literature

Pragmatic dose-escalation methods incorporating relative dose intensity assessment for molecularly targeted agents in phase I trials.

Project description:The recommended phase 2 doses of molecularly targeted agents, determined by using an ordinal dose-finding method that only uses toxicity data at first cycle, may not be optimal. Some researchers have proposed the use of relative dose intensity that can account for late-onset, cumulative, and low-grade toxicities to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In this study, we proposed two dose escalation methods based on the observed relative dose intensities (RDIs) between the pre-specified intervals (cycles) for toxicity evaluation used in combination with DLT evaluation in the first cycle. First, we propose the modified 3 + 3 design that incorporates longitudinal RDI assessment. Second, we propose the sequential assessment method for longitudinal RDI (SARDI) to achieve faster dose escalation compared to that of the modified 3 + 3 design. Simulation studies demonstrated that the SARDI was, in many cases, superior to the ordinal and modified 3 + 3 designs in respect to the selection rate of true RP2D and study period. The two proposed methods could also in some cases decrease the average number of patients enrolled in the trial compared to that of the ordinary 3 + 3 design. Incorporation of the RDI assessment into the 3 + 3 design is not difficult and does not require the use of complex statistical techniques. Therefore, we believe that investigators who routinely use the 3 + 3 design in practice can easily use our proposed methods.

| S-EPMC6883296 | biostudies-literature

Nonparametric bounds for the survivor function under general dependent truncation.

Project description:Truncation occurs in cohort studies with complex sampling schemes. When truncation is ignored or incorrectly assumed to be independent of the event time in the observable region, bias can result. We derive completely nonparametric bounds for the survivor function under truncation and censoring; these extend prior nonparametric bounds derived in the absence of truncation. We also define a hazard ratio function that links the unobservable region in which event time is less than truncation time, to the observable region in which event time is greater than truncation time, under dependent truncation. When this function can be bounded, and the probability of truncation is known approximately, it yields narrower bounds than the purely nonparametric bounds. Importantly, our approach targets the true marginal survivor function over its entire support, and is not restricted to the observable region, unlike alternative estimators. We evaluate the methods in simulations and in clinical applications.

| S-EPMC10181817 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data