Unknown

Dataset Information

0

In vivo measurement of regional corneal tangent modulus.


ABSTRACT: Currently available clinical devices are unable to measure corneal biomechanics other than at the central region. Corneal stiffness (S), thickness, and radius of curvature was measured at the central cornea (primary fixation) and 3 mm from the temporal limbus (primary and nasal fixations). The corneal tangent modulus (E) of 25 healthy subjects was calculated from these data. After confirming normality, repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) revealed significant difference in S (F(2, 48) = 21.36, p < 0.001) at different corneal regions and direction of fixations. E also varied significantly at different corneal regions and direction of fixations (RMANOVA: F(2, 48) = 23.06, p < 0.001). A higher S and a lower E were observed at the temporal region compared with the corneal centre. Nasal fixation further increased S and E values compared with primary fixation. Due to the specific arrangement of corneal collagen fibrils, heterogeneity of corneal biomechanical properties is expected. In future clinical practice, localized corneal biomechanical alternation and measurement might assist corneal disease detection and post-surgery management. In addition, practitioners should be aware of the fixation effect on corneal biomechanical measurement.

SUBMITTER: Hon Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5668273 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

In vivo measurement of regional corneal tangent modulus.

Hon Ying Y   Chen Guo-Zhen GZ   Lu Shu-Hao SH   Lam David Cc DC   Lam Andrew Kc AK  

Scientific reports 20171102 1


Currently available clinical devices are unable to measure corneal biomechanics other than at the central region. Corneal stiffness (S), thickness, and radius of curvature was measured at the central cornea (primary fixation) and 3 mm from the temporal limbus (primary and nasal fixations). The corneal tangent modulus (E) of 25 healthy subjects was calculated from these data. After confirming normality, repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) revealed significant difference in S (F(2, 48  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9288150 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4104483 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7567833 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10015226 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5698833 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9245063 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6283901 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4723153 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6136793 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7190860 | biostudies-literature