Dataset Information

Ensemblator v3: Robust atom-level comparative analyses and classification of protein structure ensembles.

ABSTRACT: Ensembles of protein structures are increasingly used to represent the conformational variation of a protein as determined by experiment and/or by molecular simulations, as well as uncertainties that may be associated with structure determinations or predictions. Making the best use of such information requires the ability to quantitatively compare entire ensembles. For this reason, we recently introduced the Ensemblator (Clark et al., Protein Sci 2015; 24:1528), a novel approach to compare user-defined groups of models, in residue level detail. Here we describe Ensemblator v3, an open-source program that employs the same basic ensemble comparison strategy but includes major advances that make it more robust, powerful, and user-friendly. Ensemblator v3 carries out multiple sequence alignments to facilitate the generation of ensembles from non-identical input structures, automatically optimizes the key global overlay parameter, optionally performs "ensemble clustering" to classify the models into subgroups, and calculates a novel "discrimination index" that quantifies similarities and differences, at residue or atom level, between each pair of subgroups. The clustering and automatic options mean that no pre-knowledge about an ensemble is required for its analysis. After describing the novel features of Ensemblator v3, we demonstrate its utility using three case studies that illustrate the ease with which complex analyses are accomplished, and the kinds of insights derived from clustering into subgroups and from the detailed information that locates significant differences. The Ensemblator v3 enhances the structural biology toolbox by greatly expanding the kinds of problems to which this ensemble comparison strategy can be applied.

SUBMITTER: Brereton AE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5734391 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ensemblator v3: Robust atom-level comparative analyses and classification of protein structure ensembles.

Brereton Andrew E AE Karplus P Andrew PA

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 20170811 1

Ensembles of protein structures are increasingly used to represent the conformational variation of a protein as determined by experiment and/or by molecular simulations, as well as uncertainties that may be associated with structure determinations or predictions. Making the best use of such information requires the ability to quantitatively compare entire ensembles. For this reason, we recently introduced the Ensemblator (Clark et al., Protein Sci 2015; 24:1528), a novel approach to compare user ...[more]

PMID: 28762605

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNew methods of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provide real-time alerts for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and rapid fluctuations of glucose levels, thereby improving glycemic control, which is especially crucial during meals and physical activity. However, complex CGM systems pose challenges for individuals with diabetes and healthcare professionals, particularly when interpreting rapid glucose level changes, dealing with sensor delays (approximately a 10 min difference between interstitial and plasma glucose readings), and addressing potential malfunctions. The development of advanced predictive glucose level classification models becomes imperative for optimizing insulin dosing and managing daily activities.MethodsThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of three different predictive models for the glucose level classification: (1) an autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA), (2) logistic regression, and (3) long short-term memory networks (LSTM). The performance of these models was evaluated in predicting hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), euglycemia (70-180 mg/dL), and hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) classes 15 min and 1 h ahead. More specifically, the confusion matrices were obtained and metrics such as precision, recall, and accuracy were computed for each model at each predictive horizon.ResultsAs expected, ARIMA underperformed the other models in predicting hyper- and hypoglycemia classes for both the 15 min and 1 h horizons. For the 15 min forecast horizon, the performance of logistic regression was the highest of all the models for all glycemia classes, with recall rates of 96% for hyper, 91% for norm, and 98% for hypoglycemia. For the 1 h forecast horizon, the LSTM model turned out to be the best for hyper- and hypoglycemia classes, achieving recall values of 85% and 87% respectively.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that different models may have varying strengths and weaknesses in predicting glucose level classes, and the choice of model should be carefully considered based on the specific requirements and context of the clinical application. The logistic regression model proved to be more accurate for the next 15 min, particularly in predicting hypoglycemia. However, the LSTM model outperformed logistic regression in predicting glucose level class for the next hour. Future research could explore hybrid models or ensemble approaches that combine the strengths of multiple models to further enhance the accuracy and reliability of glucose predictions.

Dataset Information

Ensemblator v3: Robust atom-level comparative analyses and classification of protein structure ensembles.

Publications

Ensemblator v3: Robust atom-level comparative analyses and classification of protein structure ensembles.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets