Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Body temperature measurement in mice during acute illness: implantable temperature transponder versus surface infrared thermometry.


ABSTRACT: Body temperature is a valuable parameter in determining the wellbeing of laboratory animals. However, using body temperature to refine humane endpoints during acute illness generally lacks comprehensiveness and exposes to inter-observer bias. Here we compared two methods to assess body temperature in mice, namely implanted radio frequency identification (RFID) temperature transponders (method 1) to non-contact infrared thermometry (method 2) in 435 mice for up to 7 days during normothermia and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin-induced hypothermia. There was excellent agreement between core and surface temperature as determined by method 1 and 2, respectively, whereas the intra- and inter-subject variation was higher for method 2. Nevertheless, using machine learning algorithms to determine temperature-based endpoints both methods had excellent accuracy in predicting death as an outcome event. Therefore, less expensive and cumbersome non-contact infrared thermometry can serve as a reliable alternative for implantable transponder-based systems for hypothermic responses, although requiring standardization between experimenters.

SUBMITTER: Mei J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5824949 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4943780 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4887592 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4786094 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8184925 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8654479 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5398510 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5797625 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6333116 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8210498 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3669113 | biostudies-other