Dataset Information

PBOV1 as a potential biomarker for more advanced prostate cancer based on protein and digital histomorphometric analysis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:There are few tissue-based biomarkers that can accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa) progression and aggressiveness. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of prostate and breast overexpressed 1 (PBOV1) as a potential PCa biomarker. METHODS:Patient tumor samples were designated by Grade Groups using the 2014 Gleason grading system. Primary radical prostatectomy tumors were obtained from 48 patients and evaluated for PBOV1 levels using Western blot analysis in matched cancer and benign cancer-adjacent regions. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PBOV1 was subsequently performed in 80 cancer and 80 benign cancer-adjacent patient samples across two tissue microarrays (TMAs) to verify protein levels in epithelial tissue and to assess correlation between PBOV1 proteins and nuclear architectural changes in PCa cells. Digital histomorphometric analysis was used to track 22 parameters that characterized nuclear changes in PBOV1-stained cells. Using a training and test set for validation, multivariate logistic regression (MLR) models were used to identify significant nuclear parameters that distinguish Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa regions. RESULTS:PBOV1 protein levels were increased in tumors from Grade Group 3 and above (GS 4?+?3 and???8) regions versus Grade Groups 1 and 2 (GS 3?+?3 and 3?+?4) regions (P?=?0.005) as assessed by densitometry of immunoblots. Additionally, by immunoblotting, PBOV1 protein levels differed significantly between Grade Group 2 (GS 3?+?4) and Grade Group 3 (GS 4?+?3) PCa samples (P?=?0.028). In the immunohistochemical analysis, measures of PBOV1 staining intensity strongly correlated with nuclear alterations in cancer cells. An MLR model retaining eight parameters describing PBOV1 staining intensity and nuclear architecture discriminated Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa and benign cancer-adjacent regions with a ROC-AUC of 0.90 and 0.80, respectively, in training and test sets. CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates that the PBOV1 protein could be used to discriminate Grade Group 3 and above PCa. Additionally, the PBOV1 protein could be involved in modulating changes to the nuclear architecture of PCa cells. Confirmatory studies are warranted in an independent population for further validation.

SUBMITTER: Carleton NM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5882516 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PBOV1 as a potential biomarker for more advanced prostate cancer based on protein and digital histomorphometric analysis.

Carleton Neil M NM Zhu Guangjing G Gorbounov Mikhail M Miller M Craig MC Pienta Kenneth J KJ Resar Linda M S LMS Veltri Robert W RW

The Prostate 20180309 7

<h4>Background</h4>There are few tissue-based biomarkers that can accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa) progression and aggressiveness. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of prostate and breast overexpressed 1 (PBOV1) as a potential PCa biomarker.<h4>Methods</h4>Patient tumor samples were designated by Grade Groups using the 2014 Gleason grading system. Primary radical prostatectomy tumors were obtained from 48 patients and evaluated for PBOV1 levels using Western blot analysis in mat ...[more]

PMID: 29520928

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe introduction of new medical technologies such as sensors has accelerated the process of collecting patient data for relevant clinical decisions, which has led to the introduction of a new technology known as digital biomarkers.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the methodological quality and quality of evidence from meta-analyses of digital biomarker-based interventions.MethodsThis study follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline for reporting systematic reviews, including original English publications of systematic reviews reporting meta-analyses of clinical outcomes (efficacy and safety endpoints) of digital biomarker-based interventions compared with alternative interventions without digital biomarkers. Imaging or other technologies that do not measure objective physiological or behavioral data were excluded from this study. A literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted, limited to 2019-2020. The quality of the methodology and evidence synthesis of the meta-analyses were assessed using AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations), respectively. This study was funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary.ResultsA total of 25 studies with 91 reported outcomes were included in the final analysis; 1 (4%), 1 (4%), and 23 (92%) studies had high, low, and critically low methodologic quality, respectively. As many as 6 clinical outcomes (7%) had high-quality evidence and 80 outcomes (88%) had moderate-quality evidence; 5 outcomes (5%) were rated with a low level of certainty, mainly due to risk of bias (85/91, 93%), inconsistency (27/91, 30%), and imprecision (27/91, 30%). There is high-quality evidence of improvements in mortality, transplant risk, cardiac arrhythmia detection, and stroke incidence with cardiac devices, albeit with low reporting quality. High-quality reviews of pedometers reported moderate-quality evidence, including effects on physical activity and BMI. No reports with high-quality evidence and high methodological quality were found.ConclusionsResearchers in this field should consider the AMSTAR-2 criteria and GRADE to produce high-quality studies in the future. In addition, patients, clinicians, and policymakers are advised to consider the results of this study before making clinical decisions regarding digital biomarkers to be informed of the degree of certainty of the various interventions investigated in this study. The results of this study should be considered with its limitations, such as the narrow time frame.International registered report identifier (irrid)RR2-10.2196/28204.

Project description:BackgroundSensors and digital devices have revolutionized the measurement, collection, and storage of behavioral and physiological data, leading to the new term digital biomarkers.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the scope of clinical evidence covered by systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials involving digital biomarkers.MethodsThis scoping review was organized using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. With the search limited to English publications, full-text SRs of digital biomarkers included randomized controlled trials that involved a human population and reported changes in participants' health status. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched with time frames limited to 2019 and 2020. The World Health Organization's classification systems for diseases (International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision), health interventions (International Classification of Health Interventions), and bodily functions (International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health [ICF]) were used to classify populations, interventions, and outcomes, respectively.ResultsA total of 31 SRs met the inclusion criteria. The majority of SRs studied patients with circulatory system diseases (19/31, 61%) and respiratory system diseases (9/31, 29%). Most of the prevalent interventions focused on physical activity behavior (16/31, 52%) and conversion of cardiac rhythm (4/31, 13%). Looking after one's health (physical activity; 15/31, 48%), walking (12/31, 39%), heart rhythm functions (8/31, 26%), and mortality (7/31, 23%) were the most commonly reported outcomes. In total, 16 physiological and behavioral data groups were identified using the ICF tool, such as looking after one's health (physical activity; 14/31, 45%), walking (11/31, 36%), heart rhythm (7/31, 23%), and weight maintenance functions (7/31, 23%). Various digital devices were also studied to collect these data in the included reviews, such as smart glasses, smartwatches, smart bracelets, smart shoes, and smart socks for measuring heart functions, gait pattern functions, and temperature. A substantial number (24/31, 77%) of digital biomarkers were used as interventions. Moreover, wearables (22/31, 71%) were the most common types of digital devices. Position sensors (21/31, 68%) and heart rate sensors and pulse rate sensors (12/31, 39%) were the most prevalent types of sensors used to acquire behavioral and physiological data in the SRs.ConclusionsIn recent years, the clinical evidence concerning digital biomarkers has been systematically reviewed in a wide range of study populations, interventions, digital devices, and sensor technologies, with the dominance of physical activity and cardiac monitors. We used the World Health Organization's ICF tool for classifying behavioral and physiological data, which seemed to be an applicable tool to categorize the broad scope of digital biomarkers identified in this review. To understand the clinical value of digital biomarkers, the strength and quality of the evidence on their health consequences need to be systematically evaluated.

Project description:BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most lethal cancers in male individuals. The synaptosome associated protein 25 (SNAP25) gene is a key mediator of multiple biological functions in tumors. However, its significant impact on the prognosis in PCa remains to be elucidated.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (TCGA) to identify the differentially expressed genes between PCa and normal prostate tissue. We subjected the differentially expressed genes to gene ontology analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes functional analysis, and constructed a protein-protein interaction network. We then screened for pivotal genes to identify the hub genes of prognostic significance by performing Cox regression analysis. We identified SNAP25 as one such gene and analyzed the relationship between its expression in PCa to poor prognosis using GEPIA interactive web server.ResultsTCGA database demonstrated that SNAP25 was significantly downregulated in PCa. The progressive decrease in SNAP25 expression with the increase in the clinical staging and grading of PCa demonstrates that reduced SNAP25 expression considerably exacerbates the clinical presentation. Our findings confirm that SNAP25 expression strongly correlates with overall survival, which was determined using the Gleason score. We also validated the role of SNAP25 expression in the prognosis of patients with PCa. We used Gene Set Enrichment and Gene Ontology analyses to evaluate the function of SNAP25 and further explored the association between SNAP25 expression and tumor-infiltrating immune cells using the Tumor Immune Assessment Resource database. We found for the first time that SNAP25 is involved in the activation, differentiation, and migration of immune cells in PCa. Its expression was positively correlated with immune cell infiltration, including B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells. SNAP25 expression also positively correlated with chemokines/chemokine receptors, suggesting that SNAP25 may regulate the migration of immune cells. In addition, our experimental results verified the low expression of SNAP25 in PCa cells.ConclusionOur findings indicate a relationship between SNAP25 expression and PCa, demonstrating that SNAP25 is a potential prognostic biomarker due to its vital role in immune infiltration.

Dataset Information

PBOV1 as a potential biomarker for more advanced prostate cancer based on protein and digital histomorphometric analysis.

Publications

PBOV1 as a potential biomarker for more advanced prostate cancer based on protein and digital histomorphometric analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets