Unknown

Dataset Information

0

When optimization for governing human-environment tipping elements is neither sustainable nor safe.


ABSTRACT: Optimizing economic welfare in environmental governance has been criticized for delivering short-term gains at the expense of long-term environmental degradation. Different from economic optimization, the concepts of sustainability and the more recent safe operating space have been used to derive policies in environmental governance. However, a formal comparison between these three policy paradigms is still missing, leaving policy makers uncertain which paradigm to apply. Here, we develop a better understanding of their interrelationships, using a stylized model of human-environment tipping elements. We find that no paradigm guarantees fulfilling requirements imposed by another paradigm and derive simple heuristics for the conditions under which these trade-offs occur. We show that the absence of such a master paradigm is of special relevance for governing real-world tipping systems such as climate, fisheries, and farming, which may reside in a parameter regime where economic optimization is neither sustainable nor safe.

SUBMITTER: Barfuss W 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6003916 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4102116 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2538841 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3357823 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9907888 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8370347 | biostudies-literature
2018-01-11 | GSE95023 | GEO
2016-04-28 | GSE80733 | GEO
| S-EPMC3350620 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2978326 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7493303 | biostudies-literature