Dataset Information

Perioperative clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding and blood transfusion at the time of lower extremity bypass.

ABSTRACT: Controversy persists surrounding the perceived bleeding risk associated with perioperative clopidogrel use in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB). The purpose of this study was to examine the LEB bleeding risk and clinical sequelae associated with clopidogrel.All LEBs in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from 2008 to 2014 were studied. The exposure was perioperative clopidogrel. Primary outcomes were blood transfusion, estimated blood loss ?500 mL, and reoperation for bleeding. Secondary outcomes included mean operative time, major cardiac events, respiratory complications, infectious complications, and in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze patients on the basis of clopidogrel use and its association with outcomes. Nonparametric test for trend and Mantel-Haenszel methods were used to analyze association of clopidogrel use with blood transfusion and secondary outcomes.Among the LEB cohort (N = 9179), 28% (n = 2544) were taking clopidogrel and 72% (n = 6635) were not. Patients taking clopidogrel were more likely to have coronary disease, prior coronary intervention, abnormal findings on stress test, and aspirin use (P < .001 for all). Patients taking clopidogrel were more likely to receive blood transfusion (38% vs 24%; P < .001) and to have estimated blood loss ?500 mL (21% vs 12%; P < .001). Reoperation for bleeding rates were similar (0.9% vs 1.1%; P = .9). Clopidogrel use was also associated with increased mean operative times (244 minutes vs 232 minutes; P < .001) as well as with cardiac complications (8.8% vs 6.5%; P = .001), respiratory complications (2.5% vs 1.6%; P = .007), and in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs 0.8%; P = .03). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that clopidogrel was associated with increased risk of 1- or 2-unit blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.1; P < .001) and >2-unit blood transfusion (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7-2.5; P < .001). Major cardiac events (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5; P = .05) and respiratory complications (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0; P = .03) were also independently associated with clopidogrel use. Weighted Mantel-Haenszel ORs controlling for blood transfusion amount revealed no remaining effect of clopidogrel on major cardiac events (OR, 1.1; P = .4) or respiratory complications (OR, 1.0; P = .8).Perioperative clopidogrel use in LEB surgery is associated with increased blood loss and blood transfusion. Associated clinical sequelae include increased cardiac and pulmonary complications. Accordingly, surgeons should consider discontinuation of perioperative clopidogrel when it is clinically appropriate unless it is strongly indicated at the time of LEB.

SUBMITTER: Jones DW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6114130 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Perioperative clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding and blood transfusion at the time of lower extremity bypass.

Jones Douglas W DW Schermerhorn Marc L ML Brooke Benjamin S BS Conrad Mark F MF Goodney Philip P PP Wyers Mark C MC Stone David H DH

Journal of vascular surgery 20170220 6

<h4>Objective</h4>Controversy persists surrounding the perceived bleeding risk associated with perioperative clopidogrel use in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB). The purpose of this study was to examine the LEB bleeding risk and clinical sequelae associated with clopidogrel.<h4>Methods</h4>All LEBs in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from 2008 to 2014 were studied. The exposure was perioperative clopidogrel. Primary outcomes were blood transfusion, estimated blood loss ≥500 ...[more]

PMID: 28222991

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIsolated common femoral endarterectomy was recently reported to have a 30-day mortality of 3.4%. The effect of adjunctive femoral endarterectomy at the time of lower extremity bypass is not well described, and therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine its associated perioperative and long-term risk.MethodsVascular Study Group of New England registry data were used to identify patients undergoing initial lower extremity bypass from 2003 to 2015. After univariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent association of endarterectomy with adverse perioperative events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard models were used for the 1-year analysis.ResultsAfter exclusions, 4496 patients were identified as undergoing infrainguinal bypass (33% with endarterectomy). There was no difference in the proportion with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLI; 68% vs 67%; P = .24) or tissue loss of those with CLI (65% vs 63%; P = .34) between the adjunctive endarterectomy group and bypass alone, respectively. Patients undergoing adjunctive endarterectomy were older (mean 68 years vs 67 years; P = .02), more likely white (95% vs 93%; P = .02), smokers (91% vs 87%; P = .001), and more often had prior coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention (34% vs 31%; P = .02). The endarterectomy cohort had similar 30-day mortality (CLI: 2.6% vs 2.9%; P = .60; claudication: 0.2% vs 0.4%; P = 1.0) despite a longer operative time (median, 268 minutes vs 210 minutes; P < .001) and increased blood loss (median, 250 mL vs 180 mL; P < .001). Patients with CLI undergoing adjunctive endarterectomy had more in-hospital myocardial infarctions (MIs; 6.2% vs 3.8%; P = .003) and transfusions (11% vs 6.8%; P < .001). At 1-year, this group had a suggestion of improved freedom from major amputation (91% vs 87%; P = .049) and amputation-free survival (80% vs 76%; P = .03) that did not reach significance after adjustment. For patients with claudication and adjunctive endarterectomy, rates of MI (2.4% vs 0.9%; P = .02), renal dysfunction (3.6% vs 1.4%; P = .01), surgical site infection (SSI; 5.0% vs 2.6%; P = .02), and transfusion (4.6% vs 1.8%; P = .002) were higher. After adjustment, all patients undergoing adjunctive endarterectomy were at increased risk of MI (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2), SSI (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), and bleeding requiring transfusion (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3). There were no differences in 1-year survival for CLI or claudication groups and no difference in all 1-year end points for patients with claudication.ConclusionsAdjunctive femoral endarterectomy with bypass is safe, with no difference in perioperative or 1-year mortality compared with bypass. However, surgeons should be aware that adjunctive endarterectomy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, SSI, and MI, likely from these patients' disease burden and presumed more extensive atherosclerosis.

Project description:Our aim was to evaluate the effect of gender on early and late procedural and functional outcomes of lower extremity bypass (LEB).We reviewed the records of 2576 patients (828 women; 32%) who underwent LEB for claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the Vascular Study Group of New England from 2003 to 2010. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used to adjust for potential confounding differences between genders. Morbidity, mortality, graft patency, freedom from major amputation, ambulation, and living status were analyzed postoperatively and over 1 year.Women were older (70 vs 68 years; P < .001), had more hypertension (89% vs 85%; P = .006), less coronary artery disease (35% vs 39%; P = .03), smoking (73% vs 88%; P < .001), and preoperative statin use (60% vs 64%; P = .04). Women were more likely to have CLI (76% vs 71%; P = .003), and ambulate with assistance at presentation (19% vs 16%; P = .02). Morbidity was similar except women had higher rates of reoperation for thrombosis (4% vs 2%; P < .001) without differences in major amputation (2% vs 1%; P = .13) or in-hospital mortality (1.7% vs 1.7%; P = .96). Women and men with claudication had similar 1-year graft patency rates. Women with CLI had lower rates of primary (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.48; P = .02), assisted primary (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.76; P = .001) and secondary patency (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.77; P = .006) during the first year compared with men. Freedom from amputation was similar for men and women with CLI (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.84-1.63; P = .36). There were no differences in late survival between women and men with claudication (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.60-1.31; P = .36) or CLI (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09; P = .39). More female claudicants were not independently ambulatory at discharge (30% vs 19%; P = .002) and were discharged to a nursing home (15% vs 5%; P < .001) but these differences did not persist at 1 year. Women with CLI were more likely to be nonambulatory at discharge (13% vs 9%; P = .006) and at 1 year (13% vs 8%; P < .001). More women with CLI were discharged to a nursing home (44% vs 35%; P = .01) and resided there at 1 year (11% vs 7%; P = .02).Women have complication rates similar to men with inferior early and late functional outcomes after LEB. The reduced patency rates in women with CLI did not translate into differences in limb salvage. These findings might help define physician and patient expectations for women before revascularization.

Project description:BackgroundThe oncologic safety of allogeneic blood transfusion in ovarian cancer patients is unknow. We sought to determine the prevalence and oncologic safety of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion during interval cytoreduction surgery among women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.MethodsWe utilized retrospective chart review to identify a cohort of patients undergoing interval cytoreduction at a large academic tertiary referral center. We compared outcomes in patients who were exposed to perioperative blood transfusion compared with patients who were not exposed. Our primary endpoint was progression free survival; our secondary endpoint was overall survival. Baseline clinical characteristics were collected for patients in each group.ResultsSixty-six women were included in the final cohort of women undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery after NACT. A total of 51 women (77%) were exposed to allogeneic perioperative pRBC transfusion. Fifteen women (23%) were not exposed to transfusion. The baseline characteristics were generally well matched. Women who were not exposed to a perioperative blood transfusion were more likely to have a normalized CA125 prior to undergoing cytoreductive surgery. Preoperative hemoglobin concentration was lower in the transfusion group (10.5 g/dLvs 11.5 g/dL, p <?0.009). Perioperative transfusion was not associated with a significant difference in progression free survival (PFS?=?7.6 months for transfused, 9.4 months for not transfused; log-rank test p =?0.4617). Similarly, there was no observed difference between groups for overall survival (OS?=?23.6 months for transfused, 22.5 months for not transfused; log-rank test p =?0.1723).ConclusionsWomen undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer are at high risk of exposure to blood transfusion at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery. Future studies will continue to evaluate the safety and impact of transfusion on ovarian cancer survival in this at risk population.

Dataset Information

Perioperative clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding and blood transfusion at the time of lower extremity bypass.

Publications

Perioperative clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding and blood transfusion at the time of lower extremity bypass.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets