Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300.


ABSTRACT: Background:There currently are no internationally recognised treatment guidelines for patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in whom two prior lines of therapy have failed. The randomised, phase III JAVELIN Gastric 300 trial compared avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC. Patients and methods:Patients with unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC were recruited at 147 sites globally. All patients were randomised to receive either avelumab 10?mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2?weeks or physician's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 80?mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 or irinotecan 150?mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, each of a 4-week treatment cycle); patients ineligible for chemotherapy received best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results:A total of 371 patients were randomised. The trial did not meet its primary end point of improving OS {median, 4.6 versus 5.0?months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.4]; P?=?0.81} or the secondary end points of PFS [median, 1.4 versus 2.7?months; HR=1.73 (95% CI 1.4-2.2); P?>?0.99] or ORR (2.2% versus 4.3%) in the avelumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 90 patients (48.9%) and 131 patients (74.0%) in the avelumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Grade ?3 TRAEs occurred in 17 patients (9.2%) in the avelumab arm and in 56 patients (31.6%) in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusions:Treatment of patients with GC/GEJC with single-agent avelumab in the third-line setting did not result in an improvement in OS or PFS compared with chemotherapy. Avelumab showed a more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02625623.

SUBMITTER: Bang YJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6225815 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300.

Bang Y-J YJ   Ruiz E Yañez EY   Van Cutsem E E   Lee K-W KW   Wyrwicz L L   Schenker M M   Alsina M M   Ryu M-H MH   Chung H-C HC   Evesque L L   Al-Batran S-E SE   Park S H SH   Lichinitser M M   Boku N N   Moehler M H MH   Hong J J   Xiong H H   Hallwachs R R   Conti I I   Taieb J J  

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 20181001 10


<h4>Background</h4>There currently are no internationally recognised treatment guidelines for patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in whom two prior lines of therapy have failed. The randomised, phase III JAVELIN Gastric 300 trial compared avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Patients with unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4622287 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5057500 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7578278 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8229851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3437538 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9664295 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9425884 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9352186 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8436782 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8576210 | biostudies-literature