Dataset Information

Safety and Feasibility of Lung Resection After Immunotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Tumors.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Surgeons are increasingly asked to operate on patients with residual disease after immunotherapy. The safety and utility of lung resection in this setting are unknown. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent lung resection within 6 months of treatment with checkpoint blockade agents for metastatic or unresectable cancer. Survival was estimated from the first resection using the Kaplan-Meier approach. RESULTS:Database query identified 19 patients who underwent 22 resections for suspected residual disease with therapeutic intent after immunotherapy between 2012 and 2016. Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis (47%), followed by metastatic melanoma (37%). The most frequently used agents were nivolumab (32%), pembrolizumab (32%), and ipilimumab (16%). Patients received a mean of 21 doses (range, 1 to 70 doses). The final dose was administered at an average of 75 days (range, 7 to 183 days) before the operation. Anatomic resection (lobectomy or greater) was performed in 11 patients (50%). Four lobectomies were attempted minimally invasively, and one required conversion to thoracotomy. Of the resected patients, 68% had viable tumor remaining. R0 resection was achieved in 95%. Mean operative time for lobectomy was 227 minutes (range, 150 to 394 minutes). Complications occurred in 32% of patients; all but 1 were minor (grade 1/2). The 2-year overall and disease-free survival were 77% and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with previously metastatic or unresectable cancer, lung resection for suspected residual disease after immunotherapy is feasible, with high rates of R0 resection. Operations can be technically challenging, but significant morbidity appears to be rare. Outcomes are encouraging, with reasonable survivals during short-interval follow-up.

SUBMITTER: Bott MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6357770 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety and Feasibility of Lung Resection After Immunotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Tumors.

Bott Matthew J MJ Cools-Lartigue Jonathan J Tan Kay See KS Dycoco Joseph J Bains Manjit S MS Downey Robert J RJ Huang James J Isbell James M JM Molena Daniela D Park Bernard J BJ Rusch Valerie W VW Sihag Smita S Jones David R DR Adusumilli Prasad S PS

The Annals of thoracic surgery 20180314 1

<h4>Background</h4>Surgeons are increasingly asked to operate on patients with residual disease after immunotherapy. The safety and utility of lung resection in this setting are unknown.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent lung resection within 6 months of treatment with checkpoint blockade agents for metastatic or unresectable cancer. Survival was estimated from the first resection using the Kaplan-Meier approach.<h4>Results</h4>Database query identified 19 patient ...[more]

PMID: 29550207

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAvapritinib, a novel inhibitor of KIT/PDGFRA, is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of adults with PDGFRA exon 18-mutant unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (U/M GISTs). We assessed the safety of avapritinib and provide evidence-based guidance on management of avapritinib-associated adverse events (AEs), including cognitive effects and intracranial bleeding.Materials and methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of data from a two-part, single-arm dose escalation/expansion phase I study (NAVIGATOR; NCT02508532) in patients with U/M GISTs treated with oral avapritinib 30-600 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; the impact of dose modification (interruption and/or reduction) on progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were limited to patients who started avapritinib at 300 mg (approved dose).ResultsOf 250 patients enrolled in the study, 74.0% presented with KIT mutation and 24.8% presented with PDGFRA exon 18-mutation; 66.8% started avapritinib at 300 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs (any grade) were nausea (59.2%), fatigue (50.0%), periorbital edema (42.0%), anemia (39.2%), diarrhea (36.0%), vomiting (36.0%), and increased lacrimation (30.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Among 167 patients starting on 300 mg avapritinib, all-cause cognitive effects rate (grade 1-2) was 37.0% in all patients and 52.0% in patients ≥65 years. Cognitive effects improved to a lower grade more quickly with dose modification (1.3-3.1 weeks) than without (4.9-7.6 weeks). Median PFS was 11.4 months with dose modification and 7.2 months without.ConclusionTolerability-guided dose modification of avapritinib is an effective strategy for managing AEs in patients with GISTs.Implications for practiceEarly recognition of adverse events and tailored dose modification appear to be effective approaches for managing treatment-related adverse events and maintaining patients on avapritinib. Dose reduction does not appear to result in reduced efficacy. Patients' cognitive function should be assessed at baseline and monitored carefully throughout treatment with avapritinib for the onset of cognitive adverse events. Dose interruption is recommended at the first sign of any cognitive effect, including grade 1 events.

Project description:IntroductionTo assess the technical feasibility and safety of repeated percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic biopsies and intratumoral injections of gene-modified dendritic cells in metastatic NSCLC.MethodsA total of 15 patients with 15 NSCLC lesions measuring greater than 1.0 cm underwent two cycles of intratumoral biopsies and CCL21 dendritic cell injections separated by 7 days. All needle placements and injections were done under CT guidance. Clinical and imaging follow-up was done approximately 4 weeks after the first procedure. Safety and feasibility were determined as: (1) safety and feasibility similar to that of single-needle biopsy, and (2) an absence of serious adverse events defined as grade greater than or equal to three according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.ResultsA total of 30 percutaneous, transthoracic intratumoral biopsies and injections into the lung cancer were performed, two cycles (at d 0 and 7) received by each patient (311 biopsies and 96 intratumoral injections). All percutaneous cases achieved technical success with respect to needle placement for both biopsy and injection of CCL21 dendritic cells. Only minor complications were observed (grade <3), including pneumothorax (n = 10, 33%) and small postbiopsy hemorrhage (n = 2, 7%). Pneumothorax was moderate (n = 1) or trace (n = 9), with resolution of the moderate pneumothorax after manual aspiration without chest tube placement. No patient required chest tube placement. No other complications or serious adverse effects related to the biopsy or dendritic cell injection were noted. All patients were in stable condition after up to 4 hours in the recovery unit and were discharged home on the same day. No procedure-related complications were observed on imaging or clinical follow-up at 4 weeks.ConclusionsRepeated percutaneous, transthoracic CT-guided biopsies and intratumoral gene-modified cell-based immunotherapy injections into lung cancers are technically feasible, safe, and reproducible. There were no procedure-related serious (defined as grade ≥3) adverse events.

Dataset Information

Safety and Feasibility of Lung Resection After Immunotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Tumors.

Publications

Safety and Feasibility of Lung Resection After Immunotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets