Dataset Information

Distinct Dopamine D? Receptor Antagonists Differentially Impact D? Receptor Oligomerization.

ABSTRACT: Dopamine D? receptors (D?R) are known to form transient homodimer complexes, of which the increased formation has already been associated with development of schizophrenia. Pharmacological targeting and modulation of the equilibrium of these receptor homodimers might lead to a better understanding of the critical role played by these complexes in physiological and pathological conditions. Whereas agonist addition has shown to prolong the D?R dimer lifetime and increase the level of dimer formation, the possible influence of D?R antagonists on dimerization has remained rather unexplored. Here, using a live-cell reporter assay based on the functional complementation of a split Nanoluciferase, a panel of six D?R antagonists were screened for their ability to modulate the level of D2LR dimer formation. Incubation with the D?R antagonist spiperone decreased the level of D2LR dimer formation significantly by 40-60% in real-time and after long-term (?16 h) incubations. The fact that dimer formation of the well-studied A2a-D2LR dimer was not altered following incubation with spiperone supports the specificity of this observation. Other D?R antagonists, such as clozapine, risperidone, and droperidol did not significantly evoke this dissociation event. Furthermore, molecular modeling reveals that spiperone presents specific Tyr1995.48 and Phe3906.52 conformations, compared to clozapine, which may determine D?R homodimerization.

SUBMITTER: Wouters E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6480712 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Distinct Dopamine D₂ Receptor Antagonists Differentially Impact D₂ Receptor Oligomerization.

Wouters Elise E Marín Adrián Ricarte AR Dalton James Andrew Rupert JAR Giraldo Jesús J Stove Christophe C

International journal of molecular sciences 20190404 7

Dopamine D₂ receptors (D₂R) are known to form transient homodimer complexes, of which the increased formation has already been associated with development of schizophrenia. Pharmacological targeting and modulation of the equilibrium of these receptor homodimers might lead to a better understanding of the critical role played by these complexes in physiological and pathological conditions. Whereas agonist addition has shown to prolong the D₂R dimer lifetime and increase the level of dimer formati ...[more]

PMID: 30987329

Similar Datasets

Project description:The interaction of dopaminergic and cholinergic neurotransmission in, e.g., Parkinson's disease has been well established. Here, D2 receptor antagonists were used to assess changes in [18F]-FEOBV binding to the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) in rodents using positron emission tomography (PET). After pretreatment with either 10 mg/kg haloperidol, 1 mg/kg raclopride, or vehicle, 90 min dynamic PET scans were performed with arterial blood sampling. The net influx rate (Ki) was obtained from Patlak graphical analysis, using a metabolite-corrected plasma input function and dynamic PET data. [18F]-FEOBV concentration in whole-blood or plasma and the metabolite-corrected plasma input function were not significantly changed by the pretreatments (adjusted p > 0.07, Cohen's d 0.28-1.89) while the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the parent fraction of [18F]-FEOBV was significantly higher after haloperidol treatment (adjusted p = 0.022, Cohen's d = 2.51) than in controls. Compared to controls, the AUC of [18F]-FEOBV, normalized for injected dose and body weight, was nonsignificantly increased in the striatum after haloperidol (adjusted p = 0.4, Cohen's d = 1.77) and raclopride (adjusted p = 0.052, Cohen's d = 1.49) treatment, respectively. No changes in the AUC of [18F]-FEOBV were found in the cerebellum (Cohen's d 0.63-0.74). Raclopride treatment nonsignificantly increased Ki in the striatum 1.3-fold compared to control rats (adjusted p = 0.1, Cohen's d = 1.1) while it reduced Ki in the cerebellum by 28% (adjusted p = 0.0004, Cohen's d = 2.2) compared to control rats. Pretreatment with haloperidol led to a nonsignificant reduction in Ki in the striatum (10%, adjusted p = 1, Cohen's d = 0.44) and a 40-50% lower Ki than controls in all other brain regions (adjusted p < 0.0005, Cohen's d = 3.3-4.7). The changes in Ki induced by the selective D2 receptor antagonist raclopride can in part be quantified using [18F]-FEOBV PET imaging. Haloperidol, a nonselective D2/? receptor antagonist, either paradoxically decreased cholinergic activity or blocked off-target [18F]-FEOBV binding to ? receptors. Hence, further studies evaluating the binding of [18F]-FEOBV to ? receptors using selective ? receptor ligands are necessary.

Project description:Major roadblocks to developing effective progesterone receptor (PR)-targeted therapies in breast cancer include the lack of highly-specific PR modulators, a poor understanding of the pro- or anti-tumorigenic networks for PR isoforms and ligands, and an incomplete understanding of the cross talk between PR and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling. Through genomic analyses of xenografts treated with various clinically-relevant ER and PR-targeting drugs, we describe how the activation or inhibition of PR differentially reprograms estrogen signaling, resulting in the segregation of transcriptomes into separate PR agonist and antagonist-mediated groups. These findings address an ongoing controversy regarding the clinical utility of PR agonists and antagonists, alone or in combination with tamoxifen, for breast cancer management. Additionally, the two PR isoforms PRA and PRB, bind distinct but overlapping genomic sites and interact with different sets of co-regulators to differentially modulate estrogen signaling to be either pro- or anti-tumorigenic. Of the two isoforms, PRA inhibited gene expression and ER chromatin binding significantly more than PRB. Differential gene expression was observed in PRA and PRB-rich patient tumors and PRA-rich gene signatures had poorer survival outcomes. In support of antiprogestin responsiveness of PRA-rich tumors, gene signatures associated with PR antagonists, but not PR agonists, predicted better survival outcomes. The better patient survival associated with PR antagonists versus PR agonists treatments was further reflected in the higher in vivo anti-tumor activity of therapies that combine tamoxifen with PR antagonists and modulators. This study suggests that distinguishing common effects observed due to concomitant interaction of another receptor with its ligand (agonist or antagonist), from unique isoform and ligand-specific effects will inform the development of biomarkers for patient selection and translation of PR-targeted therapies to the clinic.

Dataset Information

Distinct Dopamine D? Receptor Antagonists Differentially Impact D? Receptor Oligomerization.

Publications

Distinct Dopamine D₂ Receptor Antagonists Differentially Impact D₂ Receptor Oligomerization.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets