Dataset Information

Biomechanical comparison between standard and inclined screw orientation in dynamic hip screw side-plate fixation: The lift-off phenomenon.

ABSTRACT: Background:Common failure modes of dynamic hip screw are cut-out and lift-off. To minimize the latter, distal screws can be inserted in different orientations. However, the effectiveness remains controversial. The aim of this study was to biomechanically investigate the influence of distal screw orientation on construct stability. Methods:Thirty artificial generic long bones were assigned to three groups (n = 10) and fixed with two-hole dynamic hip screw-plates, inserting distal cortical screws with neutral parallel screw orientation (A), divergent screw orientation (B) or convergent screw orientation (C). Starting at 60 N, cyclic loading was applied to the implant tip perpendicular to the lag screw axis with progressive peak load increase at a rate of 0.002 N/cycle until failure. Parameters of interest were construct stiffness and machine actuator displacement after 250, 1000 and 5000 cycles, as well as cycles to failure. Results:Displacement after 250, 1000 and 5000 cycles was significantly higher in Group C than in Groups A and B, p < 0.01, whereas no significant differences were observed between Groups A and B, p = 0.20. Specimens in Group C failed after 11,584 [standard deviation (SD), 5924] cycles, significantly earlier than those in Groups A and B [A: 27,351 (SD, 12,509); B: 28,793 (SD, 14,764)], p ? 0.02. Cycles to failure were not significantly different between Groups A and B, p > 0.99. The translational potential of this article:Parallel or divergent distal screw insertion provides similar construct stability in terms of resistance to plate lift-off. In contrast, converging screw insertion leads to inferior stability and is not advisable from a biomechanical point of view.

SUBMITTER: Zderic I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6718874 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Biomechanical comparison between standard and inclined screw orientation in dynamic hip screw side-plate fixation: The lift-off phenomenon.

Zderic Ivan I Willhuber Gaston C GC Ahrend Marc-Daniel MD Gras Florian F Barla Jorge J Sancineto Carlos C Windolf Markus M Richards Geoff G Gueorguiev Boyko B

Journal of orthopaedic translation 20181117

<h4>Background</h4>Common failure modes of dynamic hip screw are cut-out and lift-off. To minimize the latter, distal screws can be inserted in different orientations. However, the effectiveness remains controversial. The aim of this study was to biomechanically investigate the influence of distal screw orientation on construct stability.<h4>Methods</h4>Thirty artificial generic long bones were assigned to three groups (n = 10) and fixed with two-hole dynamic hip screw-plates, inserting distal c ...[more]

PMID: 31508312

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Geriatric acetabular fractures require fixation with sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate full-weight bearing. Minimally-invasive procedures would be desirable in order to keep perioperative morbidity low. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength of lag screw-only fixation of anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures to standard anatomical plate fixation. METHODS:Standardized ACPHT fractures were created in fourth generation synthetic pelvis models and stabilized by either an anatomical buttress plate (n?=?4) or by a screw-only construct (n?=?4). In a validated setup, a cyclic loading protocol was applied with increasing axial force (3200?cycles, 175?N to 2250?N). Construct survival, acetabular fracture motion, and mode of failure were assessed. RESULTS:The median number of cycles needed until failure of the construct occurred was 2304?cycles (range, 2020 to 2675) in the plate fixation group and 3200?cycles (range, 3101 to 3200) for the screw fixation constructs (p?=?.003). With regard to energy absorbed until failure, the plate fixation group resisted to 1.57?×?106?N*cycles (range, 1.21?×?106 to 2.14?×?106) and the screw fixation group to 3.17?×?106?N*cycles (range, 2.92?×?106 to 3.17?×?106; p?=?.001). All plate fixation specimens failed with a break-out of the posterior-column screw in the quadrilateral wing of the anatomical plate within a maximum load of 1750?N while the screw fixation constructs all survived loading of at least 2100?N. Acetabular fracture gap motion, acetabular rim angle, and medial femoral head subluxation as measures of fracture displacement were all not different between the two groups (p?>?0.1). CONCLUSIONS:In this in vitro biomechanical study, screw-only fixation of an ACPHT acetabular fracture resulted in at least as good construct survival as seen for standard buttress plate fixation. Both methods resisted sufficiently to forces that would be expected under physiologic conditions.

Project description:BackgroundSacroiliac screw fixation in elderly patients with pelvic fractures is prone to failure owing to impaired bone quality. Cement augmentation has been proposed as a possible solution, because in other anatomic areas this has been shown to reduce screw loosening. However, to our knowledge, this has not been evaluated for sacroiliac screws.Questions/purposesWe investigated the potential biomechanical benefit of cement augmentation of sacroiliac screw fixation in a cadaver model of osteoporotic bone, specifically with respect to screw loosening, construct survival, and fracture-site motion.MethodsStandardized complete sacral ala fractures with intact posterior ligaments in combination with ipsilateral upper and lower pubic rami fractures were created in osteoporotic cadaver pelves and stabilized by three fixation techniques: sacroiliac (n = 5) with sacroiliac screws in S1 and S2, cemented (n = 5) with addition of cement augmentation, and transsacral (n = 5) with a single transsacral screw in S1. A cyclic loading protocol was applied with torque (1.5 Nm) and increasing axial force (250-750 N). Screw loosening, construct survival, and sacral fracture-site motion were measured by optoelectric motion tracking. A sample-size calculation revealed five samples per group to be required to achieve a power of 0.80 to detect 50% reduction in screw loosening.ResultsScrew motion in relation to the sacrum during loading with 250 N/1.5 Nm was not different among the three groups (sacroiliac: 1.2 mm, range, 0.6-1.9; cemented: 0.7 mm, range, 0.5-1.3; transsacral: 1.1 mm, range, 0.6-2.3) (p = 0.940). Screw subsidence was less in the cemented group (3.0 mm, range, 1.2-3.7) compared with the sacroiliac (5.7 mm, range, 4.7-10.4) or transsacral group (5.6 mm, range, 3.8-10.5) (p = 0.031). There was no difference with the numbers available in the median number of cycles needed until failure; this was 2921 cycles (range, 2586-5450) in the cemented group, 2570 cycles (range, 2500-5107) for the sacroiliac specimens, and 2578 cycles (range, 2540-2623) in the transsacral group (p = 0.153). The cemented group absorbed more energy before failure (8.2 × 105 N*cycles; range, 6.6 × 105-22.6 × 105) compared with the transsacral group (6.5 × 105 N*cycles; range, 6.4 × 105-6.7 × 105) (p = 0.016). There was no difference with the numbers available in terms of fracture site motion (sacroiliac: 2.9 mm, range, 0.7-5.4; cemented: 1.2 mm, range, 0.6-1.9; transsacral: 2.1 mm, range, 1.2-4.8). Probability values for all between-group comparisons were greater than 0.05.ConclusionsThe addition of cement to standard sacroiliac screw fixation seemed to change the mode and dynamics of failure in this cadaveric mechanical model. Although no advantages to cement were observed in terms of screw motion or cycles to failure among the different constructs, a cemented, two-screw sacroiliac screw construct resulted in less screw subsidence and greater energy absorbed to failure than an uncemented single transsacral screw.Clinical relevanceIn osteoporotic bone, the addition of cement to sacroiliac screw fixation might improve screw anchorage. However, larger mechanical studies using these findings as pilot data should be performed before applying these preliminary findings clinically.

Dataset Information

Biomechanical comparison between standard and inclined screw orientation in dynamic hip screw side-plate fixation: The lift-off phenomenon.

Publications

Biomechanical comparison between standard and inclined screw orientation in dynamic hip screw side-plate fixation: The lift-off phenomenon.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets