Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy for newly diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: outcome and toxicity evaluation.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in terms of toxicity and local control (LC) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. METHODS:From 2004 to 2016, 109 patients were treated, initially using 3DCRT and subsequently with VMAT. Clinical outcome was evaluated by contrast-enhanced MRI, thoracic and abdominal CT 3 months after treatments and then every 6 months. Toxicity was evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale v. 4.3. RESULTS:Patients presented Stage III soft tissue sarcoma disease (77%), localized tumor (95%) at the lower extremity (87%), adipocytic histotype (46%). Surgical resection was performed in all patients, followed by adjuvant 3DCRT in 38, and VMAT in 71. The median total dose was 66?Gy/33 fractions (range 60-70?Gy;25-35 fractions). More successful bone sparing was recorded using VMAT (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 61 months, 93 and 58 months for 3DCRT and VMAT group, respectively. The 2- and 5?year LC were 95.3±2.1%, and 87.4±3.4% for the whole cohort, 92.0±4.5%, 82.9±6.4% for 3DCRT, 97.1±2.0%, 89.6±4.1% for VMAT (p = 0.150). On univariate and multivariate analysis the factors recorded as conditioning LC were the status of the surgical resection margins (p = 0.028) and the total dose delivered (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION:The availability of modern radiotherapy technique permit a better conformity on the target with maximum sparing of normal tissue and acceptable side-effects. VMAT is a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, compared to 3DCRT. Results on LC of VMAT are encouraging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities can benefit from the use of VMAT, with a reduction of the high dose to bones to avoid radiation osteonecrosis. An adequate total dose of at least 66?Gy and a radical surgical margin allow a good local control.

SUBMITTER: Di Brina L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6774597 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy for newly diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: outcome and toxicity evaluation.

Di Brina Lucia L   Fogliata Antonella A   Navarria Pierina P   D'Agostino Giuseppe G   Franzese Ciro C   Franceschini Davide D   De Rose Fiorenza F   Comito Tiziana T   Bertuzzi Alexia A   Marrari Andrea A   Colombo Piergiuseppe P   Quagliuolo Vittorio V   Santoro Armando A   Scorsetti Marta M  

The British journal of radiology 20190725 1102


<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the impact of adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in terms of toxicity and local control (LC) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.<h4>Methods</h4>From 2004 to 2016, 109 patients were treated, initially using 3DCRT and subsequently with VMAT. Clinical outcome was evaluated by contrast-enhanced MRI, thoracic and abdominal CT 3 months after treatments and then every 6 mon  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4667972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10033624 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3608058 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4617910 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3984750 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3856548 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2967715 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5869893 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6560241 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8058026 | biostudies-literature