Dataset Information

Anti-Oxidized LDL Antibodies and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: Antibodies to oxidized LDL (oxLDL) may be associated with improved outcomes in cardiovascular disease. However, analysis is restricted by heterogenous study design and endpoints. Our objective was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review assessing anti-oxLDL antibodies in relation to coronary artery disease (CAD). Through a systematic literature search, we identified all studies assessing the relationship of either, IgG or IgM ox-LDL/ copper-oxLDL/ malondialdehyde-LDL, with coronary atherosclerosis or cardiovascular events in populations with, and without, established CAD. Systematic review best practices were adhered to and study quality was assessed. An initial electronic database search identified 2059 records, which was subsequently followed by abstract and full-text review. Finally, we included 18 studies with over 1811 patients with CAD. The studies varied according to populations studied, conventional cardiovascular risk factors and interventional modalities used to assess CAD. IgM anti-oxLDL antibodies were found to indicate protection from more severe CAD and possibly cardiovascular events, whilst the relationship with IgG is more complex and difficult to elucidate, with studies reporting divergent results. In this systematic review, there is evidence that suggests a relationship between anti-oxLDL antibodies and CAD, especially for the IgM subclass. However, further studies, with well-characterized prospective cohorts, will be important to clarify these associations.

SUBMITTER: van den Berg VJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6826549 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Anti-Oxidized LDL Antibodies and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

van den Berg Victor J VJ Vroegindewey Maxime M MM Kardys Isabella I Boersma Eric E Haskard Dorian D Hartley Adam A Khamis Ramzi R

Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 20191015 10

Antibodies to oxidized LDL (oxLDL) may be associated with improved outcomes in cardiovascular disease. However, analysis is restricted by heterogenous study design and endpoints. Our objective was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review assessing anti-oxLDL antibodies in relation to coronary artery disease (CAD). Through a systematic literature search, we identified all studies assessing the relationship of either, IgG or IgM ox-LDL/ copper-oxLDL/ malondialdehyde-LDL, with coronary atherosc ...[more]

PMID: 31618991

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe concept of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines the left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-left anterior descending (LAD) graft and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to non-LAD vessels. Multiple comparative studies have evaluated the safety and feasibility of HCR and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery disease (MCAD). However, the sample size of each study was small, and evidences based on single-institutional experience. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term outcomes of HCR with those of CABG for MCAD.MethodPubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, as well as conference proceedings, were searched for eligible studies published up to March 2014. We calculated summary odds ratios (OR) for primary endpoints (death, stroke; myocardial infarction (MI); target vessel revascularization (TVR); major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)) and secondary endpoints (atrial fibrillation (AF); renal failure; length of stay in the intensive care unit (LoS in ICU); length of stay in hospital (LoS in hospital); red blood cell (RBC) transfusion). Data from 6176 participants were derived from ten cohort studies.ResultsHCR was non-inferior to CABG in terms of MACCEs during hospitalization (odds ratio (OR), 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-1.33)and at one-year follow-up(0.32, 0.05-1.89) , and no significant difference was found between HCR and CABG groups in in-hospital and one-year follow-up outcomes of death, MI, stroke, the prevalence of AF and renal failure, whereas HCR was associated with a lower requirement of RBC transfusion and shorter LoS in ICU and LoS in hospital than CABG (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.25, 95% CI, -1.62 to -0.88; -17.47, -31.01 to -3.93; -1.77, -3.07 to -0.46; respectively).ConclusionOur meta-analysis indicates that HCR is feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of MCAD, with similar in-hospital and one-year follow-up outcome, significantly lower requirement of RBC transfusion, and faster recovery compared with CABG.

Project description:BackgroundLipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) are each independent risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The extent to which Lp(a) and OxPLs predict coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and outcomes in a contemporary, statin-treated cohort is not well established.ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the relationships between Lp(a) particle concentration and OxPLs associated with apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB) or apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo[a]) with angiographic CAD and cardiovascular outcomes.MethodsAmong 1,098 participants referred for coronary angiography in the CASABLANCA (Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases) study, Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) were measured. Logistic regression estimated the risk of multivessel coronary stenoses by Lp(a)-related biomarker level. Cox proportional hazards regression estimated the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (coronary revascularization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) in follow-up.ResultsMedian Lp(a) was 26.45 nmol/L (IQR: 11.39-89.49 nmol/L). Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) were highly correlated (Spearman R ≥0.91 for all pairwise combinations). Lp(a) and OxPL-apoB were associated with multivessel CAD. Odds of multivessel CAD per doubling of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) were 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03-1.18; P = 0.006), 1.18 (95% CI: 1.03-1.34; P = 0.01), and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99-1.16; P = 0.07), respectively. All biomarkers were associated with cardiovascular events. HRs for MACE per doubling of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) were 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.14; P = 0.001), 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05-1.26; P = 0.004), and 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01-1.14; P = 0.02), respectively.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing coronary angiography, Lp(a) and OxPL-apoB are associated with multivessel CAD. Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) are associated with incident cardiovascular events. (Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases [CASABLANCA]; NCT00842868).

Project description:IntroductionLong term management of patients with stable coronary artery disease of >1 year after myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation is unclear. Current guidelines recommend using oral anti-coagulation (OAC) alone although the recommendation is weak and there is low quality evidence. Two new randomized control trials (RCTs) were published recently. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of these studies on patient outcomes.ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs and observational studies to compare OAC alone versus OAC plus single anti-platelet therapy.MethodsElectronic searches were conducted using appropriate terms from 3 databases. Relevant studies included. Data extracted and analysis were performed using STATA.MeasurementsSummary statistics were pooled and measured for primary and secondary outcomes of both treatment arms.Main resultsEight studies involving 10,120 patients were included for the analysis. Five thousand two hundred thirty-seven patients were on combination therapy while 4883 were on OAC alone. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.067; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.912-1.249; P value .417). There was no statistically significant difference even in the measured secondary outcomes namely all cause mortality (HR 1.048; 95% CI 0.830-1.323; P value .695), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.863; 95% CI 0.593-1.254; P value .439). However, we found statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the incidence of MI with higher incidence in mono therapy group (HR 1.229; 95% CI 1.011-1.495; P value .039) and higher incidence of major bleeding in the combination therapy group in the subgroup analysis (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.464-0.907; P value .011).ConclusionWe found no reduction of major adverse cardiac event between combination therapy and mono therapy. Although mono therapy showed increased risk of major bleeding overall, subgroup analysis of the RCTs showed increased risk of major bleeding in the combination therapy group. MI was higher in the mono therapy group compared to the combination therapy group, however this outcome was not reproducible in the subgroup analysis of the RCTs.

Project description:BackgroundThe inflammation hypothesis of atherosclerosis has been put forward for more than 20 years. Although many animal experiments have suggested that anti-inflammatory therapy can inhibit the atherosclerotic process, the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is still controversial. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with CAD.MethodWe conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by searching PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, and Cochrane Library database. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. The secondary outcomes included individual MI, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and stroke. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcome events were calculated by the fixed effects model, and trial sequential analysis was applied to assess the results.ResultA total of ten randomized controlled trials and 60,782 patients with CAD was included. Compared with patients receiving placebo, anti-inflammatory therapy significantly reduced the incidence of the primary outcome in patients with CAD (RR 0.93, 0.89-0.98, P = 0.007). In addition, the anti-inflammatory therapy can also reduce the risk of MI (RR 0.90, 0.84-0.96, P = 0.002) and coronary revascularization (RR 0.74, 0.66-0.84, P < 0.00001) remarkably. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of cardiovascular death (RR 0.94, 0.86-1.02, P = 0.14), all-cause death (RR 1.00, 0.94-1.07, P = 0.98) and stroke (RR 0.96, 0.85-1.09, P = 0.51) between two groups.ConclusionsAnti-inflammatory therapy can reduce the incidence of the primary outcome in patients with CAD, especially the risk of MI and coronary revascularization. However, anti-inflammatory therapy increases the risk of infection. (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD 420212291032).

Dataset Information

Anti-Oxidized LDL Antibodies and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

Publications

Anti-Oxidized LDL Antibodies and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets