Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
A fundamental question in influenza research is whether antibody titre decline upon successive exposure to variant strains is consequent to recall of cross-reactive memory B cells that competitively inhibit naive B-cell responses. In connection, it is not clear whether naive and memory B cells remain phenotypically distinct acutely after activation such that they may be distinguished ex vivo.Methods
Here, we first compared the capacity of anti-Ig and Toll-like-receptor (TLR) 7/8 and TLR9 agonists (R848 and CpG) to augment human B-cell differentiation induced by IL-21 and sCD40L. The conditions that induced optimal differentiation were then used to compare the post-activation phenotype of sort-purified naive and memory B-cell subsets by FACS and antibody-secreting cell (ASC) ELISPOT.Results
Sort-purified naive and memory B cells underwent robust plasmablast and ASC formation when stimulated with R848, but not CpG, and co-cultured with monocytes. This coincided with increased IL-1β and IL-6 production when B cells were co-cultured with monocytes and stimulated with R848, but not CpG. Naive B cells underwent equivalent ASC generation, but exhibited less class-switch and modulation of CD27, CD38 and CD20 expression than memory B cells after stimulation with R848 and monocytes for 6 days.Conclusion
Stimulation with R848, IL-21 and sCD40L in the presence of monocytes induces robust differentiation and ASC generation from both naive and memory B-cells. However, naive and memory B cells retain key phenotypic differences after activation that may facilitate ex vivo discrimination and better characterisation of acute responses to variant antigens.
SUBMITTER: Auladell M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6851823 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Clinical & translational immunology 20191113 11
<h4>Objectives</h4>A fundamental question in influenza research is whether antibody titre decline upon successive exposure to variant strains is consequent to recall of cross-reactive memory B cells that competitively inhibit naive B-cell responses. In connection, it is not clear whether naive and memory B cells remain phenotypically distinct acutely after activation such that they may be distinguished <i>ex vivo</i>.<h4>Methods</h4>Here, we first compared the capacity of anti-Ig and Toll-like-r ...[more]