Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Rationale
Experimental tasks that demonstrate alcohol-related attentional bias typically expose participants to single-stimulus targets (e.g. addiction Stroop, visual probe, anti-saccade task), which may not correspond fully with real-world contexts where alcoholic and non-alcoholic cues simultaneously compete for attention. Moreover, alcoholic stimuli are rarely matched to other appetitive non-alcoholic stimuli.Objectives
To address these limitations by utilising a conjunction search eye-tracking task and matched stimuli to examine alcohol-related attentional bias.Methods
Thirty social drinkers (Mage?= 19.87, SD?=?1.74) were asked to detect whether alcoholic (beer), non-alcoholic (water) or non-appetitive (detergent) targets were present or absent amongst a visual array of matching and non-matching distractors. Both behavioural response times and eye-movement dwell time were measured.Results
Social drinkers were significantly quicker to detect alcoholic and non-alcoholic appetitive targets relative to non-appetitive targets in an array of matching and mismatching distractors. Similarly, proportional dwell time was lower for both alcoholic and non-alcoholic appetitive distractors relative to non-appetitive distractors, suggesting that appetitive targets were relatively easier to detect.Conclusions
Social drinkers may exhibit generalised attentional bias towards alcoholic and non-alcoholic appetitive cues. This adds to emergent research suggesting that the mechanisms driving these individual's attention towards alcoholic cues might 'spill over' to other appetitive cues, possibly due to associative learning.
SUBMITTER: Pennington CR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6892770 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Pennington Charlotte R CR Qureshi Adam W AW Monk Rebecca L RL Greenwood Katie K Heim Derek D
Psychopharmacology 20190708 12
<h4>Rationale</h4>Experimental tasks that demonstrate alcohol-related attentional bias typically expose participants to single-stimulus targets (e.g. addiction Stroop, visual probe, anti-saccade task), which may not correspond fully with real-world contexts where alcoholic and non-alcoholic cues simultaneously compete for attention. Moreover, alcoholic stimuli are rarely matched to other appetitive non-alcoholic stimuli.<h4>Objectives</h4>To address these limitations by utilising a conjunction s ...[more]