Dataset Information

Data supporting UCrad and CGM, two novel methodologies for radiological impacts in Life Cycle Assessment.

ABSTRACT: Radiological impacts are often disregarded in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) due to the lack of a standard and comprehensive framework for including the impacts of radionuclides alongside other emissions from industrial processes. This data article is related to the research articles "Radiological Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment. Part I: General framework and two practical methodologies" [1] and "Radiological Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment. Part II: Comparison of Methodologies" [2], which introduced two practical methodologies for assessing the radiological impacts in LCA; these are UCrad and the Critical Group Methodology (CGM). This article reports the characterisation factors, for routine direct discharges and releases from nuclear waste disposed in a geological disposal facility, obtained from both methodologies. The article also reports the underlying data supporting the methodologies and the analysis carried out in the related research articles.

SUBMITTER: Paulillo A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6906723 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Data supporting UCrad and CGM, two novel methodologies for radiological impacts in Life Cycle Assessment.

Paulillo Andrea A Clift Roland R Dodds Jonathan J Milliken Andrew A Palethorpe Stephen S Lettieri Paola P

Data in brief 20191126

Radiological impacts are often disregarded in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) due to the lack of a standard and comprehensive framework for including the impacts of radionuclides alongside other emissions from industrial processes. This data article is related to the research articles "Radiological Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment. Part I: General framework and two practical methodologies" [1] and "Radiological Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment. Part II: Comparison of Methodologies" [2], which introd ...[more]

PMID: 31867416

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeAs capture fishery production has reached its limits and global demand for aquatic products is still increasing, aquaculture has become the world's fastest growing animal production sector. In attempts to evaluate the environmental consequences of this rapid expansion, life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a frequently used method. The present review of current peer-reviewed literature focusing on LCA of aquaculture systems is intended to clarify the methodological choices made, identify possible data gaps, and provide recommendations for future development within this field of research. The results of this review will also serve as a start-up activity of the EU FP7 SEAT (Sustaining Ethical Aquaculture Trade) project, which aims to perform several LCA studies on aquaculture systems in Asia over the next few years.MethodsFrom a full analysis of methodology in LCA, six phases were identified to differ the most amongst ten peer-reviewed articles and two PhD theses (functional unit, system boundaries, data and data quality, allocation, impact assessment methods, interpretation methods). Each phase is discussed with regards to differences amongst the studies, current LCA literature followed by recommendations where appropriate. The conclusions and recommendations section reflects on aquaculture-specific scenarios as well as on some more general issues in LCA.ResultsAquaculture LCAs often require large system boundaries, including fisheries, agriculture, and livestock production systems from around the globe. The reviewed studies offered limited coverage of production in developing countries, low-intensity farming practices, and non-finfish species, although most farmed aquatic products originate from a wide range of farming practices in Asia. Apart from different choices of functional unit, system boundaries and impact assessment methods, the studies also differed in their choice of allocation factors and data sourcing. Interpretation of results also differed amongst the studies, and a number of methodological choices were identified influencing the outcomes.Conclusions and recommendationsEfforts should be made to increase transparency to allow the results to be reproduced, and to construct aquaculture related database(s). More extensive data reporting, including environmental flows, within the greater field of LCA could be achieved, without compromising the focus of studies, by providing supporting information to articles and/or reporting only ID numbers from background databases. More research is needed into aquaculture in Asia based on the latest progress made by the LCA community.

Dataset Information

Data supporting UCrad and CGM, two novel methodologies for radiological impacts in Life Cycle Assessment.

Publications

Data supporting UCrad and CGM, two novel methodologies for radiological impacts in Life Cycle Assessment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure