Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a commercially available sequencing assay for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to determine the best approach to identify gene rearrangements (GRs) in large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs).Methods
Comparison of standard-of-care FISH assays (including a two-probe approach for MYC; break-apart and fusion probes) and an integrated genomic DNA/RNA sequencing CGP approach on a set of 69 consecutive LBCL cases.Results
CGP detected GRs, including those involving MYC (1), BCL-2 (3), and BCL-6 (3), not detected by FISH. FISH detected non-IgH-MYC (4) and BCL-6 (2) GRs that were not detected by CGP. In four instances, standalone CGP or FISH testing would have missed a double-hit lymphoma.Conclusions
CGP was superior to FISH in the detection of IgH-MYC rearrangements but was inferior for the detection of non-IgH-MYC rearrangements. Our study demonstrates the rationale for development of a customized approach to identify GRs in LBCLs.
SUBMITTER: Cassidy DP
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7007318 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Cassidy Daniel P DP Chapman Jennifer R JR Lopez Rafael R White Kyle K Fan Yao-Shan YS Casas Carmen C Severson Eric A EA Vega Francisco F
American journal of clinical pathology 20200201 3
<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a commercially available sequencing assay for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to determine the best approach to identify gene rearrangements (GRs) in large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs).<h4>Methods</h4>Comparison of standard-of-care FISH assays (including a two-probe approach for MYC; break-apart and fusion probes) and an integrated genomic DNA/RNA sequencing CGP approach on a set of 69 consecutive LBCL cases.<h4>Result ...[more]