Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Correction for multiple testing in candidate-gene methylation studies.


ABSTRACT: Aim: We compared the performance of multiple testing corrections for candidate gene methylation studies, namely Sidak (accurate Bonferroni), false-discovery rate and three adjustments that incorporate the correlation between CpGs: extreme tail theory (ETT), Gao et al. (GEA), and Li and Ji methods. Materials & methods: The experiment-wide type 1 error rate was examined in simulations based on Illumina EPIC and 450K data. Results: For high-correlation genes, Sidak and false-discovery rate corrections were conservative while the Li and Ji method was liberal. The GEA method tended to be conservative unless a threshold parameter was adjusted. The ETT yielded an appropriate type 1 error rate. Conclusion: For genes with substantial correlation across measured CpGs, GEA and ETT can appropriately correct for multiple testing in candidate gene methylation studies.

SUBMITTER: Zhou Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7132638 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<b>Aim:</b> We compared the performance of multiple testing corrections for candidate gene methylation studies, namely Sidak (accurate Bonferroni), false-discovery rate and three adjustments that incorporate the correlation between CpGs: extreme tail theory (ETT), Gao <i>et al.</i> (GEA), and Li and Ji methods. <b>Materials & methods:</b> The experiment-wide type 1 error rate was examined in simulations based on Illumina EPIC and 450K data. <b>Results:</b> For high-correlation genes, Sidak and f  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7881646 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4457958 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3925272 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5397327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4818520 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6101967 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8191638 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3769109 | biostudies-literature
2023-08-05 | GSE184218 | GEO
2023-08-05 | GSE184215 | GEO