Dataset Information

Evaluation of RF interactions between a 3T birdcage transmit coil and transcranial magnetic stimulation coils using a realistically shaped head phantom.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Multichannel transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)¹ is an emerging technology that allows multiple sites to be stimulated simultaneously or sequentially under electronic control without movement of the coils. A multichannel TMS/MRI head coil array for 3 Tesla is currently under development to mitigate challenges of concurrent TMS/fMRI as well as enable potential new applications. The influence of the multichannel TMS system on the MR image quality and safety must be carefully investigated.

Methods

A standard birdcage volume coil for 3 Tesla systems was simulated using a commercial numerical electromagnetic solver. Two setups, consisting of 1) a MR-compatible TMS coil, and 2) a 3-axis TMS coil array, were simulated to quantify changes in the transmit field B1+ and the SAR. A realistically shaped homogeneous head model was used in the computations.

Results

The stimulation coils produced enhancements and attenuations on the transmit field with effects greater than 5% up to 2.4 cm and 3.3 cm under the scalp for the MR-compatible TMS coil and 3-axis TMS coil array, respectively. The 10 g-SAR distribution did not change significantly in either of the cases; however, the nominal SAR maximum locus was shifted between existing hot spots.

Conclusion

The simulated B1+ variations found near the TMS coils indicate the possibility of inducing sequence-dependent image artefacts predominatly limited to the vicinity of the coil(s). However, we conclude that neither the MR-compatible commercial TMS coil nor the 3-axis TMS coil array siginificantly elevate SAR in the head or neck beyond accepted safety limits.

SUBMITTER: Navarro de Lara LI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7180091 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective.Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique widely used for neuromodulation. Animal models are essential for investigating the underlying mechanisms of TMS. However, the lack of miniaturized coils hinders the TMS studies in small animals, since most commercial coils are designed for humans and thus incapable of focal stimulation in small animals. Furthermore, it is difficult to perform electrophysiological recordings at the TMS focal point using conventional coils.Approach.We designed, fabricated, and tested a novel miniaturized TMS coil (4-by-7 mm) that consisted of a C-shaped iron powder core and insulated copper wires (30 turns). The resulting magnetic and electric fields were characterized with experimental measurements and finite element modeling. The efficacy of this coil in neuromodulation was validated with electrophysiological recordings of single-unit activities (SUAs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in rats (n= 32) following repetitive TMS (rTMS; 3 min, 10 Hz).Main results.This coil could generate a maximum magnetic field of 460 mT and an electric field of 7.2 V m-1in the rat brain according to our simulations. With subthreshold rTMS focally delivered over the sensorimotor cortex, mean firing rates of primary somatosensory and motor cortical neurons significantly increased (154±5% and 160±9% from the baseline level, respectively); MEP and SSEP amplitude significantly increased (136±9%) and decreased (74±4%), respectively.Significance.This miniaturized C-shaped coil enabled focal TMS and concurrent electrophysiological recording/stimulation at the TMS focal point. It provided a useful tool to investigate the neural responses and underlying mechanisms of TMS in small animal models. Using this paradigm, we for the first time observed distinct modulatory effects on SUAs, SSEPs, and MEPs with the same rTMS protocol in anesthetized rats. These results suggested that multiple neurobiological mechanisms in the sensorimotor pathways were differentially modulated by rTMS.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The quality of carotid wall MRI can benefit substantially from a dedicated RF coil that is tailored towards the human neck geometry and optimized for image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), parallel imaging performance and RF penetration depth and coverage. In last decades, several of such dedicated carotid coils were introduced. However, a comparison of the more successful designs is still lacking. OBJECTIVE:To perform a head-to-head comparison over four dedicated MR carotid surface coils with 4, 6, 8 and 30 coil elements, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Ten volunteers were scanned on a 3T scanner. For each subject, multiple black-blood carotid vessel wall images were measured using the four coils with different parallel imaging settings. The performance of the coils was evaluated and compared in terms of image coverage, penetration depth and noise correlations between elements. Vessel wall of a common carotid section was delineated manually. Subsequently, images were assessed based on vessel wall morphology and image quality parameters. The morphological parameters consisted of the vessel wall area, thickness, and normalized wall index (wall area/total vessel area). Image quality parameters consisted of vessel wall SNR, wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the vessel g-factor, and CNRindex ((wall-lumen signal) / (wall+lumen signal)). Repeated measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA) was applied for each parameter for the averaged 10 slices for all volunteers to assess effect of coil and SENSE factor. If the rmANOVA was significant, post-hoc comparisons were conducted. RESULTS:No significant coil effect were found for vessel wall morphological parameters. SENSE acceleration affected some morphological parameters for 6- and 8-channel coils, but had no effect on the 30-channel coil. The 30-channel coil achieved high acceleration factors (10x) with significantly lower vessel g-factor values (ps ≤ 0.01), but lower vessel wall SNR and CNR values (ps ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION:All four coils were capable of high-quality carotid MRI. The 30-channel coil is recommended when rapid image acquisition acceleration is required for 3D measurements, whereas 6- and 8-channel coils demonstrated the highest SNR performance.