Dataset Information

Methylphenidate affects task-switching and neural signaling in non-human primates.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale

Low doses of psychostimulants such as methylphenidate (MPH), which increase extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine by inhibiting their reuptake, are the most commonly used treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Therapeutic doses of these drugs may improve focused attention at the expense of hindering other cognitive functions, including the ability to adapt behavior in response to changing circumstances-cognitive flexibility. Cognitive flexibility is thought to depend on proper operation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and is also linked to reward processing, which is dopamine-dependent. Additionally, reward outcome signals have been recorded from the PFC.

Objectives

This study tested the hypothesis that therapeutic doses of MPH impair cognitive flexibility and that this impairment in performance resulted from interference in reward signals within the PFC.

Methods

Four rhesus monkeys were given therapeutically relevant doses of oral MPH (0, 3, and 6 mg/kg) while performing an oculomotor switching task to evaluate its effect on task performance. Single-unit recordings in the PFC of two monkeys were taken before and after MPH administration during task performance.

Results

The results show that MPH does hinder switching task performance, an effect that was correlated with a reduction in the amplitude of outcome signals found in the discharges of some neurons in the PFC.

Conclusions

Methylphenidate impaired task-switching performance, which can be used as a measure of cognitive flexibility. This detriment may result from degraded outcome signaling within the PFC. This study has implications for the use of MPH in the treatment of ADHD.

SUBMITTER: Rajala AZ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7196524 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBehavioral studies in both human and animals generally converge to the dogma that multisensory integration improves reaction times (RTs) in comparison to unimodal stimulation. These multisensory effects depend on diverse conditions among which the most studied were the spatial and temporal congruences. Further, most of the studies are using relatively simple stimuli while in everyday life, we are confronted to a large variety of complex stimulations constantly changing our attentional focus over time, a modality switch that can impact on stimuli detection. In the present study, we examined the potential sources of the variability in reaction times and multisensory gains with respect to the intrinsic features of a large set of natural stimuli.Methodology/principle findingsRhesus macaque monkeys and human subjects performed a simple audio-visual stimulus detection task in which a large collection of unimodal and bimodal natural stimuli with semantic specificities was presented at different saliencies. Although we were able to reproduce the well-established redundant signal effect, we failed to reveal a systematic violation of the race model which is considered to demonstrate multisensory integration. In both monkeys and human species, our study revealed a large range of multisensory gains, with negative and positive values. While modality switch has clear effects on reaction times, one of the main causes of the variability of multisensory gains appeared to be linked to the intrinsic physical parameters of the stimuli.Conclusion/significanceBased on the variability of multisensory benefits, our results suggest that the neuronal mechanisms responsible of the redundant effect (interactions vs. integration) are highly dependent on the stimulus complexity suggesting different implications of uni- and multisensory brain regions. Further, in a simple detection task, the semantic values of individual stimuli tend to have no significant impact on task performances, an effect which is probably present in more cognitive tasks.