Dataset Information

Adaptation of the Gut Microbiota to Modern Dietary Sugars and Sweeteners.

ABSTRACT: The consumption of sugar has become central to the Western diet. Cost and health concerns associated with sucrose spurred the development and consumption of other sugars and sweeteners, with the average American consuming 10 times more sugar than 100 y ago. In this review, we discuss how gut microbes are affected by changes in the consumption of sugars and other sweeteners through transcriptional, abundance, and genetic adaptations. We propose that these adaptations result in microbes taking on different metabolic, ecological, and genetic profiles along the intestinal tract. We suggest novel approaches to assess the consequences of these changes on host-microbe interactions to determine the safety of novel sugars and sweeteners.

SUBMITTER: Di Rienzi SC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7231582 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adaptation of the Gut Microbiota to Modern Dietary Sugars and Sweeteners.

Di Rienzi Sara C SC Britton Robert A RA

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 20200501 3

The consumption of sugar has become central to the Western diet. Cost and health concerns associated with sucrose spurred the development and consumption of other sugars and sweeteners, with the average American consuming 10 times more sugar than 100 y ago. In this review, we discuss how gut microbes are affected by changes in the consumption of sugars and other sweeteners through transcriptional, abundance, and genetic adaptations. We propose that these adaptations result in microbes taking on ...[more]

PMID: 31696209

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe health of honeybee colonies is critical for bee products and agricultural production, and colony health is closely associated with the bacteria in the guts of honeybees. Although colony loss in winter is now the primary restriction in beekeeping, the effects of different sugars as winter food on the health of honeybee colonies are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, the influence of different sugar diets on honeybee gut bacteria during overwintering was examined.ResultsThe bacterial communities in honeybee midguts and hindguts before winter and after bees were fed honey, sucrose, and high-fructose syrup as winter-food were determined by targeting the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA using the Illumina MiSeq platform. The dominant microbiota in honeybee guts were the phyla Proteobacteria (63.17%), Firmicutes (17.61%; Lactobacillus, 15.91%), Actinobacteria (4.06%; Bifidobacterium, 3.34%), and Bacteroidetes (1.72%). The dominant taxa were conserved and not affected by season, type of overwintering sugar, or spatial position in the gut. However, the relative abundance of the dominant taxa was affected by those factors. In the midgut, microbial diversity of the sucrose group was higher than that of the honey and high-fructose syrup groups, but in the hindgut, microbial diversity of the honey and high-fructose groups was higher than that in the sucrose group. Sucrose increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria (Bifidobacteriales Bifidobacteriaceae) and Alphaproteobacteria (Rhizobiales and Mitochondria) of honeybee midgut, and honey enriched the Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria (Pasteurellales) in honeybee hindgut. High-fructose syrup increased the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria (Neisseriales: Neisseriaceae) of the midgut.ConclusionThe type of sugar used as winter food affected the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial communities in honeybee guts, not the taxa, which could affect the health and safety of honeybee colonies during overwintering. The presence of the supernal Alphaproteobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, and Lactobacillaceae in the gut of honeybees fed sucrose and cheaper than honey both indicate that sucrose is very suitable as the overwintering food for honeybees.

Project description:Plasticity in the microbial community composition and function can permit the host to adapt to ecological, environmental, and physiological changes. Much of the information on the gut microbiota-host relationship to date derives from studies of laboratory model organisms, while little is known concerning wild animals and their ecological relevance to gut microbes. It is also unclear how microbial community composition and activity adapt to changes in diet and energy, nutritional requirements, and utilization induced by dietary expansion from invertebrates to vertebrates. The great evening bat (Ia io) is both an insectivore and an avivore (that is, a bird-eater), and thus provides an opportunity to investigate the diet-host-microbiota-physiology relationship. Here, we investigated this relationship by using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and functional prediction in adult males of I. io. We found that gut microbial diversity was similar, while microbial community structures were significantly different between insectivorous and avivorous diets. Moreover, increases in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and the Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, changes in carbohydrate and nucleotide metabolism, and a decrease in Pseudomonas were associated with higher energy demands for hunting birds and with fat storage for entering hibernation and migration. These findings demonstrated that seasonal dietary shifts drive a significant change in the composition and function of gut microbiomes, thereby facilitating adaptation to the challenging avian dietary niche in bats. These results suggest that the gut microbial communities can constantly respond to alterations in diets, potentially facilitating the diversity of wild animal dietary niches, and enhance our understanding of the diet-host-microbiota-physiology relationship. IMPORTANCE The coevolution between the host and its gut microbes can promote an animal's adaptation to its specific ecological niche and changes in energy and nutritional requirements. This study focused on an avivorous bat, the great evening bat (Ia io), to investigate how seasonal dietary shifts affect the gut microbial composition and function, thereby facilitating adaptation to an avian diet. We found that seasonal dietary shifts driving a significant change in the composition and function of gut microbiomes in I. io were associated with higher energy demands for hunting birds and fat storage for entering hibernation and migration. Our study provides novel insight into the role of gut bacteria in generating ecological diversity and flexibility in wild mammals. The results are valuable for clarifying the complicated host-microbiota-physiology relationship in a dietary niche expansion context.

Project description:Abstract Objectives Health authorities recommend reducing added or free sugars to ≤5–10% energy. Much attention has focussed of the reduction of SSBs with the recommendation that SSBs be replaced with unsweetened healthy alternatives such as water but not non-nutritive sweetened beverages (NSBs). There are concerns that non-nutritive sweeteners do not have the intended benefits and may induce glucose intolerance through changes in the gut microbiome. Whether NSBs have benefits similar to water in their intended substitution for SSBs is unclear. Methods To address this question, we have undertaken the STOP Sugars NOW trial (NCT03543644), a pragmatic “head-to-head” crossover randomized controlled trial of the effect of NSBs (the intended substitution) versus water (the standard of care) as a replacement strategy for SSBs on glucose tolerance and gut microbiome diversity. We recruited overweight or obese participants with a high waist circumference who regularly consume ≥1 SSBs/day. Each participant underwent a ≥2-week run-in period followed by three 4- week treatment phases in random order (usual SSBs, equivalent NSBs, or water) with each phase separated by a ≥4-week washout. The two primary outcomes are change in glucose tolerance and gut microbiome beta- diversity. Adherence to the interventions will be assessed by objective biomarkers of added sugars (13C/12C isotopic ratio in serum fatty acids and urinary fructose and sucrose) and non-nutritive sweeteners (urinary sucralose and acesulfame-potassium). Results The trial started on June 1st, 2018 with the first participant undergoing randomization on August 1st, 2019 and the last participant finishing on October 15th, 2020. We screened 1,086 individuals, out of which 80 were randomized. Baseline characteristics showed a mean age of 41.8 ± 13.0 y, BMI of 33.7 ± 6.8 kg/m2, waist circumference of 108.7 ± 13.5 cm, and mean SSBs intake of 2 SSBs/day. Conclusions The results of this trial will directly inform public health guidance on the use of NSBs in sugars reduction strategies. Funding Sources CIHR.

Dataset Information

Adaptation of the Gut Microbiota to Modern Dietary Sugars and Sweeteners.

Publications

Adaptation of the Gut Microbiota to Modern Dietary Sugars and Sweeteners.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets