Dataset Information

Reduced intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia using melphalan- vs busulfan-based regimens: a CIBMTR report.

ABSTRACT: There is a lack of large comparative study on the outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) and fludarabine/melphalan (FM) regimens. Adult AML patients from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who received first RIC allo-transplant between 2001 and 2015 were studied. Patients were excluded if they received cord blood or identical twin transplant, total body irradiation in conditioning, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with in vitro T-cell depletion. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were leukemia-free survival (LFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and GVHD. Multivariate survival model was used with adjustment for patient, leukemia, and transplant-related factors. A total of 622 patients received FM and 791 received FB RIC. Compared with FB, the FM group had fewer transplant in complete remission (CR), fewer matched sibling donors, and less usage of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. More patients in the FM group received marrow grafts and had transplantation before 2005. OS was significantly lower within the first 3 months posttransplant in the FM group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82, P < .001), but was marginally superior beyond 3 months (HR = 0.87, P = .05). LFS was better with FM compared with FB (HR = 0.89, P = .05). NRM was significantly increased in the FM group during the first 3 months of posttransplant (HR = 3.85, P < .001). Long-term relapse was lower with FM (HR = 0.65, P < .001). Analysis restricted to patients with CR showed comparable results. In conclusion, compared with FB, the FM RIC showed a marginally superior long-term OS and LFS and a lower relapse rate. A lower OS early posttransplant within 3 months was largely the result of a higher early NRM.

SUBMITTER: Zhou Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7362362 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAllogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the ultimate cure for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).AimThis study was performed to compare the outcomes of ALL patients receiving busulfan (Bu) with cyclophosphamide (Cy)-based or total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimen in a Chinese population.MethodsWe enrolled 224 adult patients with ALL who received allo-HSCT at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1997 and 2016.ResultsThe median age at transplantation was 33 years. Before allo-HSCT, 75.9% of patients attained first or late complete remission. A total of 141 patients (62.9%) received Bu/Cy-based conditioning, either myeloablative (MA) or reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST), and 83 patients received a TBI-based regimen (MA-TBI). Patients receiving the MA-Bu regimen had longer relapse-free survival (RFS) than those receiving the MA-TBI regimen (median, 24.1 vs. 6.7 months, p = .044). There was no difference in overall survival (OS, MA-Bu vs. MA-TBI vs. RIST-Bu: 39.4 vs. 28.2 vs. 13.1 months, p = .276), treatment-related mortality (TRM), or incidences of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Among patients receiving identical GvHD prophylactic regimens, there was no difference between MA-Bu and MA-TBI groups regarding the incidence of grade 3-4 acute GvHD, grade 2-4, and all-grade chronic GvHD. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving oral busulfan had comparable RFS and OS to the intravenous busulfan group (p = .436 and p = .236, respectively), but a higher TRM (25% vs. 9.8%, p = .016). In the multivariable analysis, disease status before allo-HSCT was the only risk factor impacting RFS and OS.ConclusionIn summary, patients receiving Bu/Cy-based or TBI-based regimens as conditioning had similar results in terms of OS, TRM, and acute GvHD, whereas the use of myeloablative Bu/Cy resulted in a better RFS. A Bu-based regimen could be an alternative conditioning choice for patients who are ineligible to receive TBI. Prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the long-term outcomes.

Dataset Information

Reduced intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia using melphalan- vs busulfan-based regimens: a CIBMTR report.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets