Dataset Information

Estimated forces and moments experienced by osseointegrated endoprostheses for lower extremity amputees.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) docking of prosthetic limbs returns loading directly to the residual bone of individuals with amputations. Lower limb diaphyseal biomechanics have not been studied during the wide range of daily activities performed by individuals with lower extremity amputations; therefore, little is known about the loads experienced at the bone-endoprosthetic interface of a percutaneous OI device.

Research question

Does residual limb length and/or gender influence loading magnitudes in the diaphysis of the femur or tibia during daily activities?

Methods

This observational study used motion capture data from 40 non-amputee volunteers performing nine activities ranging from low to high demand, to virtually simulate residual limbs of amputees. To simulate diaphyseal bone loading in individuals with lower limb amputations, virtual joints were defined during post-processing at 25, 50, and 75 % of residual limb length of both the femur and the tibia, representing six clinically relevant residual limb lengths for OI device placement. Peak axial distractive and compressive forces, torsional moments, and bending moments were calculated for each activity. Comparisons were made between genders and between different levels of the simulated residual limb.

Results

For simulated above and below knee amputations, short residual limbs showed the highest average bending, torsion, and axial distractive loads, while axial compressive loads were highest for long residual limbs. Absolute maxima for all subjects showed this same trend, except in below knee torsion, where 75 % residual tibia length showed the maximum. The highest demand activities yielding peaks in all directions were cutting with right leg planted, jump, run, and fall.

Significance

Overall, individuals with shorter residual limbs experienced higher diaphyseal forces. This should be taken into consideration during surgical implantation of percutaneous OI devices where residual limb length can potentially be shortened, and during rehabilitation of percutaneous OI patients.

SUBMITTER: Taylor CE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7417188 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Balance recovery after tripping often requires an active adaptation of foot placement. Thus far, few attempts have been made to actively assist forward foot placement for balance recovery employing wearable devices. This study aims to explore the possibilities of active forward foot placement through two paradigms of actuation: assistive moments exerted with the reaction moments either internal or external to the human body, namely 'joint' moments and 'free' moments, respectively. Both paradigms can be applied to manipulate the motion of segments of the body (e.g., the shank or thigh), but joint actuators also exert opposing reaction moments on neighbouring body segments, altering posture and potentially inhibiting tripping recovery. We therefore hypothesised that a free moment paradigm is more effective in assisting balance recovery following tripping. The simulation software SCONE was used to simulate gait and tripping over various ground-fixed obstacles during the early swing phase. To aid forward foot placement, joint moments and free moments were applied either on the thigh to augment hip flexion or on the shank to augment knee extension. Two realizations of joint moments on the hip were simulated, with the reaction moment applied to either the pelvis or the contralateral thigh. The simulation results show that assisting hip flexion with either actuation paradigm on the thigh can result in full recovery of gait with a margin of stability and leg kinematics closely matching the unperturbed case. However, when assisting knee extension with moments on the shank, free moment effectively assist balance but joint moments with the reaction moment on the thigh do not. For joint moments assisting hip flexion, placement of the reaction moment on the contralateral thigh was more effective in achieving the desired limb dynamics than placing the reaction on the pelvis. Poor choice of placement of reaction moments may therefore have detrimental consequences for balance recovery, and removing them entirely (i.e., free moment) could be a more effective and reliable alternative. These results challenge conventional assumptions and may inform the design and development of a new generation of minimalistic wearable devices to promote balance during gait.

Project description:Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) implants are increasingly viable as an alternative to socket suspension of prosthetic limbs. Upper extremity prostheses have also become more complex to better replicate hand and arm function and attempt to recreate pre-amputation functional levels. With more functionality comes heavier devices that put more stress on the bone-implant interface, which could be an issue for implant stability. This study quantified transhumeral loading at defined amputation levels using four simulated prosthetic limb-types: (1) body powered hook, (2) myoelectric hook, (3) myoelectric hand, and (4) advanced prosthetic limb. Computational models were constructed to replicate the weight distribution of each prosthesis type, then applied to motion capture data collected during Advanced Activities of Daily Living (AADLs). For activities that did not include a handheld weight, the body powered prosthesis bending moments were 13-33% (range of means for each activity across amputation levels) of the intact arm moments (reference 100%), torsional moments were 12-15%, and axial pullout forces were 30-40% of the intact case (p≤0.001). The myoelectric hook and hand bending moments were 60-99%, torsional moments were 44-97%, and axial pullout forces were 62-101% of the intact case. The advanced prosthesis bending moments were 177-201%, torsional moments were 164-326%, and axial pullout forces were 133-185% of the intact case (p≤0.001). The addition of a handheld weight for briefcase carry and jug lift activities reduced the overall impact of the prosthetic model itself, where the body powered forces and moments were much closer to those of the intact model, and more complex prostheses further increased forces and moments beyond the intact arm levels. These results reveal a ranked order in loading magnitude according to complexity of the prosthetic device, and highlight the importance of considering the patient's desired terminal device when planning post-operative percutaneous OI rehabilitation and training.

Project description:BackgroundNormative foot kinematic and kinetic data with different walking speeds will benefit rehabilitation programs and improving gait performance. The purpose of this study was to analyze foot kinematics and kinetics differences between slow walking (SW), normal walking (NW) and fast walking (FW) of healthy subjects.MethodsA total of 10 healthy male subjects participated in this study; they were asked to carry out walks at a self-selected speed. After measuring and averaging the results of NW, the subjects were asked to perform a 25% slower and 25% faster walk, respectively. Temporal-spatial parameters, kinematics of the tibia (TB), hindfoot (HF), forefoot (FF) and hallux (HX), and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were recorded while the subjects walked at averaged speeds of 1.01 m/s (SW), 1.34 m/s (NW), and 1.68 m/s (FW).ResultsHindfoot relative to tibia (HF/TB) and forefoot relative to hindfoot (FF/HF) dorsiflexion (DF) increased in FW, while hallux relative to forefoot (HX/FF) DF decreased. Increased peak eversion (EV) and peak external rotation (ER) in HF/TB were observed in FW with decreased peak supination (SP) in FF/HF. GRFs were increased significantly with walking speed. The peak values of the knee and ankle moments in the sagittal and frontal planes significantly increased during FW compared with SW and NW.DiscussionLimited HF/TB and FF/HF motion of SW was likely compensated for increased HX/FF DF. Although small angle variation in HF/TB EV and FF/HF SP during FW may have profound effects for foot kinetics. Higher HF/TB ER contributed to the FF push-off the ground while the center of mass (COM) progresses forward in FW, therefore accompanied by higher FF/HF abduction in FW. Increased peak vertical GRF in FW may affected by decreased stance duration time, the biomechanical mechanism maybe the change in vertical COM height and increase leg stiffness. Walking speed changes accompanied with modulated sagittal plane ankle moments to alter the braking GRF during loading response. The findings of foot kinematics, GRFs, and lower limb joint moments among healthy males may set a reference to distinguish abnormal and pathological gait patterns.

Project description:Background: The value of employing an orthopedic technician or advanced practice provider (OT/APP) to assist trainees during on-call hours has not been assessed. As the third most common pediatric long bone fracture, most tibial fractures can be managed with closed reduction and casting. Purpose: We sought to determine whether clinical outcomes could be positively affected for traumatic childhood tibia fractures by using an experienced OT/APP to aid orthopedic surgery residents with closed reduction and casting. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of tibial shaft fractures that occurred between 2010 and January 2017. Fractures undergoing manipulation and closed reduction by orthopedic surgery residents (post-graduate year 2 to 4) in the emergency department were included and differentiated into 2 cohorts: (1) residents who performed the procedure alone and (2) residents who were assisted by an OT/APP. Comparisons in cast quality and treatment success were made using univariate statistics followed by a multivariate Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. Results: Of the 73 patients who met our criteria, 38 received treatment by a resident alone and 35 by a resident assisted by an OT/APP. Evidence to support our hypothesis was found with the resident-alone group "over" padding the casts posteriorly. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the rate of subsequent surgical intervention was more than double in the resident-alone group (31% vs 14%), yet OT/APP castings underwent more wedging at follow-up (17% vs 0%). CART analysis revealed initial fracture severity and lack of OT/APP assistance as predictors of surgical intervention with terminal nodes, in increasing order of risk of requiring surgical intervention: lower translation on sagittal and anteroposterior (AP), lower sagittal translation with greater AP translation, greater sagittal translation with OT/APP assistance, and greater sagittal translation without assistance. The initiation of a cast application-training program in 2015 decreased the need for surgical treatment in the resident-only group (pre-program 38.5% vs post-program 17%), although this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: When residents were assisted by OT/APP with initial tibia closed reduction and casting, subsequent loss of reduction was more likely to be managed with cast wedging; when this assistance was not available, there was a higher rate of fractures needing surgical intervention due, in part, to poor casting technique. The reduction in the rate of surgical intervention after an internal training program was implemented suggests that trainees may improve their casting ability without added help of an experienced assistant. Future study should be performed on distal radius fractures to determine if the presented findings are valid across casting types.