Dataset Information

Predicting steady-state endoxifen plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients by CYP2D6 genotyping or phenotyping. Which approach is more reliable?

ABSTRACT: In previous studies, steady-state Z-endoxifen plasma concentrations (ENDOss) correlated with relapse-free survival in women on tamoxifen (TAM) treatment for breast cancer. ENDOss also correlated significantly with CYP2D6 genotype (activity score) and CYP2D6 phenotype (dextromethorphan test). Our aim was to ascertain which method for assessing CYP2D6 activity is more reliable in predicting ENDOss. The study concerned 203 Caucasian women on tamoxifen-adjuvant therapy (20 mg q.d.). Before starting treatment, CYP2D6 was genotyped (and activity scores computed), and the urinary log(dextromethorphan/dextrorphan) ratio [log(DM/DX)] was calculated after 15 mg of oral dextromethorphan. Plasma concentrations of TAM, N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (ND-TAM), Z-4OH-tamoxifen (4OH-TAM) and ENDO were assayed 1, 4, and 8 months after first administering TAM. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify the clinical and laboratory variables predicting log-transformed ENDOss (log-ENDOss). Genotype-derived CYP2D6 phenotypes (PM, IM, NM, EM) and log(DM/DX) correlated independently with log-ENDOss. Genotype-phenotype concordance was almost complete only for poor metabolizers, whereas it emerged that 34% of intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid metabolizers were classified differently based on log(DM/DX). Multivariable regression analysis selected log(DM/DX) as the best predictor, with patients' age, weak inhibitor use, and CYP2D6 phenotype decreasingly important: log-ENDOss = 0.162 - log(DM/DX) × 0.170 + age × 0.0063 - weak inhibitor use × 0.250 + IM × 0.105 + (NM + UM) × 0.210; (R2 = 0.51). In conclusion, log(DM/DX) seems superior to genotype-derived CYP2D6 phenotype in predicting ENDOss.

SUBMITTER: Gusella M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7437348 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predicting steady-state endoxifen plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients by CYP2D6 genotyping or phenotyping. Which approach is more reliable?

Gusella Milena M Pasini Felice F Corso Barbara B Bertolaso Laura L De Rosa Giovanni G Falci Cristina C Modena Yasmina Y Barile Carmen C Da Corte Z Donatella D Fraccon AnnaPaola A Toso Silvia S Cretella Elisabetta E Brunello Antonella A Modonesi Caterina C Segati Romana R Oliani Cristina C Minicuci Nadia N Padrini Roberto R

Pharmacology research & perspectives 20201001 5

In previous studies, steady-state Z-endoxifen plasma concentrations (ENDOss) correlated with relapse-free survival in women on tamoxifen (TAM) treatment for breast cancer. ENDOss also correlated significantly with CYP2D6 genotype (activity score) and CYP2D6 phenotype (dextromethorphan test). Our aim was to ascertain which method for assessing CYP2D6 activity is more reliable in predicting ENDOss. The study concerned 203 Caucasian women on tamoxifen-adjuvant therapy (20 mg q.d.). Before starting ...[more]

PMID: 32813313

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPolymorphic CYP2D6 is primarily responsible for metabolic activation of tamoxifen to endoxifen. We previously reported that by increasing the daily tamoxifen dose to 40 mg/day in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer (IM), but not poor metabolizer (PM), patients achieve endoxifen concentrations similar to those of extensive metabolizer patients on 20 mg/day. We expanded enrollment to assess the safety of CYP2D6 genotype-guided dose escalation and investigate concentration differences between races.MethodsPM and IM breast cancer patients currently receiving tamoxifen at 20 mg/day were enrolled for genotype-guided escalation to 40 mg/day. Endoxifen was measured at baseline and after 4 months. Quality-of-life data were collected using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Menopausal Symptom Scale at baseline and after 4 months.ResultsIn 353 newly enrolled patients, genotype-guided dose escalation eliminated baseline concentration differences in IM (p = .08), but not PM (p = .009), patients. Endoxifen concentrations were similar in black and white patients overall (p = .63) and within CYP2D6 phenotype groups (p > .05). In the quality-of-life analysis of 480 patients, dose escalation did not meaningfully diminish quality of life; in fact, improvements were seen in several measures including the FACT Breast Cancer subscale (p = .004) and limitations in range of motion (p < .0001) in IM patients.ConclusionDifferences in endoxifen concentration during treatment can be eliminated by doubling the tamoxifen dose in IM patients, without an appreciable effect on quality of life. Validation of the association between endoxifen concentration and efficacy or prospective demonstration of improved efficacy is necessary to warrant clinical uptake of this personalized treatment strategy.Implications for practiceThis secondary analysis of a prospective CYP2D6 genotype-guided tamoxifen dose escalation study confirms that escalation to 40 mg/day in patients with low-activity CYP2D6 phenotypes (poor or intermediate metabolizers) increases endoxifen concentrations without any obvious increases in treatment-related toxicity. It remains unknown whether endoxifen concentration is a useful predictor of tamoxifen efficacy, and thus, there is no current role in clinical practice for CYP2D6 genotype-guided tamoxifen dose adjustment. If future studies confirm the importance of endoxifen concentrations for tamoxifen efficacy and report a target concentration, this study provides guidance for a dose-adjustment approach that could maximize efficacy while maintaining patient quality of life.

Project description:ObjectiveTo identify genetic variants that influence steady-state etonogestrel concentrations among contraceptive implant users.MethodsWe enrolled healthy, reproductive-age women in our pharmacogenomic study using etonogestrel implants for 12-36 months without concomitant use of hepatic enzyme inducers or inhibitors. We collected participant characteristics, measured serum etonogestrel concentrations, and genotyped each participant for 120 single nucleotide variants in 14 genes encoding proteins involved in steroid hormone (ie, estrogens, progestins) metabolism, regulation, or function. We performed generalized linear modeling to identify genetic variants associated with steady-state etonogestrel concentrations.ResultsWe enrolled 350 women, who had a median serum etonogestrel concentration of 137.4 pg/mL (range 55.8-695.1). Our final generalized linear model contained three genetic variants associated with serum etonogestrel concentrations: NR1I2(PXR) rs2461817 (β=13.36, P=.005), PGR rs537681 (β=-29.77, P=.007), and CYP3A7*1C (β=-35.06, P=.025). Variant allele frequencies were 69.4%, 84.9%, and 5.1%, respectively. Our linear model also contained two nongenetic factors associated with etonogestrel concentrations: body mass index (BMI) (β=-3.08, P=7.0×10) and duration of implant use (β=-1.60, P=5.8×10); R for the model =0.17.ConclusionOnly BMI and duration of implant use remained significantly associated with steady-state etonogestrel concentrations. Of the three novel genetic associations found, one variant associated with increased etonogestrel metabolism (CYP3A7*1C) causes adult expression of fetal CYP3A7 proteins and can consequently alter steroid hormone metabolism. Women with this variant may potentially have increased metabolism of all steroid hormones, as 27.8% (5/18) of CYP3A7*1C carriers had serum etonogestrel concentrations that fell below the threshold for consistent ovulatory suppression (less than 90 pg/mL). More pharmacogenomic investigations are needed to advance our understanding of how genetic variation can influence the effectiveness and safety of hormonal contraception, and lay the groundwork for personalized medicine approaches in women's health.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03092037.

Dataset Information

Predicting steady-state endoxifen plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients by CYP2D6 genotyping or phenotyping. Which approach is more reliable?

Publications

Predicting steady-state endoxifen plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients by CYP2D6 genotyping or phenotyping. Which approach is more reliable?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets