Dataset Information

In-home Compared With In-Clinic Warfarin Therapy Monitoring in Mechanical Heart Valves: A Population-Based Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate differences in time in therapeutic range (TTR), major bleeding, thromboembolism, and survival comparing in-home and in-clinic international normalized ratio monitoring for patients with mechanical heart valves receiving warfarin anticoagulation.

Patients and methods

An observational population-based study of 383 patients (mean ± SD age, 61.5±14.1 years; 38.6% female) with mechanical heart valves (aortic, 77.8%; mitral, 31.1%; tricuspid, 1%; pulmonic 0.2%; and multiple, 9.7%) was performed from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. The target international normalized ratio was 2.5 for 199 patients (52.0%) and 3.0 for 184 (48.0). Of these patients, 37.9% (n=145) were managed by in-home monitoring (cases) and 62.1% (n=238) were monitored in the clinic (controls).

Results

During median follow-up of 3.1 years, mean ± SD TTR was similar between in-home (66.6%±19.2%) and in-clinic (67.2%±19.8%) monitoring (P=.76). There were no differences between the in-home and in-clinic groups regarding survival to major bleeding (5.7% per person-year vs 6.7% per person-year; P=.66) or thrombotic complications (2.3% vs 1.8%; P=.56). In-home monitoring was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83; P=.01) on univariate analysis; however, this was no longer apparent when controlling for age and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction.

Conclusion

In this real-world population-based study of patients with mechanical heart valves, in-home monitoring was equivalent to in-clinic monitoring regarding TTR and important clinical outcomes.

SUBMITTER: van Zyl M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7560573 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

In-home Compared With In-Clinic Warfarin Therapy Monitoring in Mechanical Heart Valves: A Population-Based Study.

van Zyl Martin M Wysokinski Waldemar E WE Jaeger Thomas M TM Casanegra Ana I AI Gersh Bernard J BJ McBane Robert D RD

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes 20200815 5

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate differences in time in therapeutic range (TTR), major bleeding, thromboembolism, and survival comparing in-home and in-clinic international normalized ratio monitoring for patients with mechanical heart valves receiving warfarin anticoagulation.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>An observational population-based study of 383 patients (mean ± SD age, 61.5±14.1 years; 38.6% female) with mechanical heart valves (aortic, 77.8%; mitral, 31.1%; tricuspid, 1%; pulmonic 0.2%; and ...[more]

PMID: 33083699

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients with mechanical heart valves are usually maintained on anticoagulation therapy. However, after a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage event, administration of anticoagulants is temporarily ceased, and it remains unclear when to restart anticoagulation therapy.MethodsA cohort study was conducted to investigate the optimal time for restarting anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. All patients with mechanical valves who experienced spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage and were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Zhejiang University Medical School between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patient electronic medical records were reviewed and the correlation between the time of restarting anticoagulation (within 3 days or more than 3 days after hemorrhage) and patient prognosis was assessed.ResultsA total of 40 patients with mechanical heart valves who experienced spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage were enrolled in this study. All patients were given oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy prior to admission (1.5-3.25 mg). After admission, patients were administered fresh frozen plasma and/or vitamin K1 to reverse anticoagulation. Out of the 16 patients (40%) who underwent surgical intervention, 4 died from cerebral hemorrhage deterioration during the hospital stay and did not restart anticoagulant therapy. Anticoagulant therapy was resumed within 3 days for 18 patients and more than three days after hemorrhage for the other 18 patients. After discharge, patients were followed up for 12 months or more. Unfortunately, during this period, 17% of patients (6/36) died.ConclusionsDefinitive hemostatic measures can be as an important factor in the clinical resumption of anticoagulation. Halting anticoagulant therapy for 3 to 7 days may be safe. It is recommended that low molecular heparin be administered within 3 days as a bridge treatment, combine with warfarin anticoagulant therapy within 1 week after hemorrhage.

Project description:BackgroundThe US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation.ObjectiveTo compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement.DesignComparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants.ParticipantsAdults (18-85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (≥ 138 mmHg systolic or ≥ 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit.MeasuresPatient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1-7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed.Key resultsFive hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM.ConclusionsParticipants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257.

Project description:Aims:Evidence is lacking regarding acute anticoagulation management in patients after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) with implanted mechanical heart valves (MHVs). Our objective was to investigate anticoagulation reversal and resumption strategies by evaluating incidences of haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications, thereby defining an optimal time-window when to restart therapeutic anticoagulation (TA) in patients with MHV and ICH. Methods and results:We pooled individual patient-data (n = 2504) from a nationwide multicentre cohort-study (RETRACE, conducted at 22 German centres) and eventually identified MHV-patients (n = 137) with anticoagulation-associated ICH for outcome analyses. The primary outcome consisted of major haemorrhagic complications analysed during hospital stay according to treatment exposure (restarted TA vs. no-TA). Secondary outcomes comprised thromboembolic complications, the composite outcome (haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications), timing of TA, and mortality. Adjusted analyses involved propensity-score matching and multivariable cox-regressions to identify optimal timing of TA. In 66/137 (48%) of patients TA was restarted, being associated with increased haemorrhagic (TA = 17/66 (26%) vs. no-TA = 4/71 (6%); P < 0.01) and a trend to decreased thromboembolic complications (TA = 1/66 (2%) vs. no-TA = 7/71 (10%); P = 0.06). Controlling treatment crossovers provided an incidence rate-ratio [hazard ratio (HR) 10.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.67-35.70; P < 0.01] in disadvantage of TA for haemorrhagic complications. Analyses of TA-timing displayed significant harm until Day 13 after ICH (HR 7.06, 95% CI 2.33-21.37; P < 0.01). The hazard for the composite-balancing both complications, was increased for restarted TA until Day 6 (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.10-5.70; P = 0.03). Conclusion:Restarting TA within less than 2 weeks after ICH in patients with MHV was associated with increased haemorrhagic complications. Optimal weighing-between least risks for thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications-provided an earliest starting point of TA at Day 6, reserved only for patients at high thromboembolic risk.

Dataset Information

In-home Compared With In-Clinic Warfarin Therapy Monitoring in Mechanical Heart Valves: A Population-Based Study.

Objective

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

In-home Compared With In-Clinic Warfarin Therapy Monitoring in Mechanical Heart Valves: A Population-Based Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets