Dataset Information

Estimation in meta-analyses of response ratios.

ABSTRACT:

Background

For outcomes that studies report as the means in the treatment and control groups, some medical applications and nearly half of meta-analyses in ecology express the effect as the ratio of means (RoM), also called the response ratio (RR), analyzed in the logarithmic scale as the log-response-ratio, LRR.

Methods

In random-effects meta-analysis of LRR, with normal and lognormal data, we studied the performance of estimators of the between-study variance, ?², (measured by bias and coverage) in assessing heterogeneity of study-level effects, and also the performance of related estimators of the overall effect in the log scale, ?. We obtained additional empirical evidence from two examples.

Results

The results of our extensive simulations showed several challenges in using LRR as an effect measure. Point estimators of ?² had considerable bias or were unreliable, and interval estimators of ?² seldom had the intended 95% coverage for small to moderate-sized samples (n<40). Results for estimating ? differed between lognormal and normal data.

Conclusions

For lognormal data, we can recommend only SSW, a weighted average in which a study's weight is proportional to its effective sample size, (when n?40) and its companion interval (when n?10). Normal data posed greater challenges. When the means were far enough from 0 (more than one standard deviation, 4 in our simulations), SSW was practically unbiased, and its companion interval was the only option.

SUBMITTER: Bakbergenuly I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7579974 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Estimation in meta-analyses of response ratios.

Bakbergenuly Ilyas I Hoaglin David C DC Kulinskaya Elena E

BMC medical research methodology 20201022 1

<h4>Background</h4>For outcomes that studies report as the means in the treatment and control groups, some medical applications and nearly half of meta-analyses in ecology express the effect as the ratio of means (RoM), also called the response ratio (RR), analyzed in the logarithmic scale as the log-response-ratio, LRR.<h4>Methods</h4>In random-effects meta-analysis of LRR, with normal and lognormal data, we studied the performance of estimators of the between-study variance, τ<sup>2</sup>, (me ...[more]

PMID: 33092521

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The expression of suicidal ideation is considered to be an important warning sign for suicide. However, the predictive properties of suicidal ideation as a test of later suicide are unclear.AimsTo assess the strength of the association between suicidal ideation and later suicide measured by odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). METHOD:We located English-language studies indexed in PubMed that reported the expression or non-expression of suicidal ideation among people who later died by suicide or did not. A random effects meta-analysis was used to assess the pooled OR, sensitivity, specificity and PPV of suicidal ideation for later suicide among groups of people from psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings. RESULTS:There was a moderately strong but highly heterogeneous association between suicidal ideation and later suicide (n = 71, OR = 3.41, 95% CI 2.59-4.49, 95% prediction interval 0.42-28.1, I2 = 89.4, Q-value = 661, d.f.(Q) = 70, P ?0.001). Studies conducted in primary care and other non-psychiatric settings had similar pooled odds to studies of current and former psychiatric patients (OR = 3.86 v. OR = 3.23, P = 0.7). The pooled sensitivity of suicidal ideation for later suicide was 41% (95% CI 35-48) and the pooled specificity was 86% (95% CI 76-92), with high between-study heterogeneity. Studies of suicidal ideation expressed by current and former psychiatric patients had a significantly higher pooled sensitivity (46% v. 22%) and lower pooled specificity (81% v. 96%) than studies conducted in non-psychiatric settings. The PPV among non-psychiatric cohorts (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1%-0.5%) was significantly lower (Q-value = 35.6, P < 0.001) than among psychiatric samples (3.9%, 95% CI 2.2-6.6). CONCLUSIONS:Estimates of the extent of the association between suicidal ideation and later suicide are limited by unexplained between-study heterogeneity. The utility of suicidal ideation as a test for later suicide is limited by a modest sensitivity and low PPV.Declaration interestM.M.L. and C.J.R. have provided expert evidence in civil, criminal and coronial matters. I.B.H. has been a Commissioner in Australia's National Mental Health Commission since 2012. He is the Co-Director, Health and Policy at the Brain and Mind Centre (BMC) University of Sydney. The BMC operates an early-intervention youth services at Camperdown under contract to Headspace. I.B.H. has previously led community-based and pharmaceutical industry-supported (Wyeth, Eli Lily, Servier, Pfizer, AstraZeneca) projects focused on the identification and better management of anxiety and depression. He is a Board Member of Psychosis Australia Trust and a member of Veterans Mental Health Clinical Reference group. He was a member of the Medical Advisory Panel for Medibank Private until October 2017. He is the Chief Scientific Advisor to, and an equity shareholder in, InnoWell. InnoWell has been formed by the University of Sydney and PricewaterhouseCoopers to administer the $30 M Australian Government Funded Project Synergy. Project Synergy is a 3-year programme for the transformation of mental health services through the use of innovative technologies.

Project description:HIV/AIDS is an ongoing global pandemic, with an estimated 39 million infected worldwide. Early detection is anticipated to help improve outcomes and prevent further infections. Point-of-care diagnostics make HIV/AIDS diagnoses available both earlier and to a broader population. Wide-spread and automated HIV risk estimation can offer objective guidance. This supports providers in making an informed decision when considering patients with high HIV risk for HIV testing or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We propose a novel machine learning method that allows providers to use the data from a patient's previous stays at the clinic to estimate their HIV risk. All features available in the clinical data are considered, making the set of features objective and independent of expert opinions. The proposed method builds on association rules that are derived from the data. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) is determined for each rule. Given a new patient, the mean IRR of all applicable rules is used to estimate their HIV risk. The method was tested and validated on the publicly available clinical database MIMIC-IV, which consists of around 525,000 hospital stays that included a stay at the intensive care unit or emergency department. We evaluated the method using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best performance with an AUC of 0.88 was achieved with a model consisting of 53 rules. A threshold value of 0.66 leads to a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 53%. The rules were grouped into drug abuse, psychological illnesses (e.g., PTSD), previously known associations (e.g., pulmonary diseases), and new associations (e.g., certain diagnostic procedures). In conclusion, we propose a novel HIV risk estimation method that builds on existing clinical data. It incorporates a wide range of features, leading to a model that is independent of expert opinions. It supports providers in making informed decisions in the point-of-care diagnostics process by estimating a patient's HIV risk.

Dataset Information

Estimation in meta-analyses of response ratios.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Estimation in meta-analyses of response ratios.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets