Performance of a lymphocyte t interferon gamma test (Quantiferon-TB gold in tube) in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in HIV-infected children.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Sanogo B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7647084 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Performance of a lymphocyte t interferon gamma test (Quantiferon-TB gold in tube) in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in HIV-infected children.
Sanogo Bintou B Ouermi Alain Saga AS Barro Makoura M Millogo Anselme A Ouattara Ad Bafa Ibrahim ABI Abdoul Salam Ouédraogo O Nacro Boubacar B
PloS one 20201106 11
<h4>Objective</h4>Evaluate the performance of QuantiFERON ® -TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT), to improve the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) in Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus (HIV)-infected children.<h4>Method</h4>Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of QFT-GIT were assessed in 58/63 HIV-infected children who were suspected of having TB.<h4>Results</h4>Sensitivity of QFT-GIT was 20.69%, specificity 96.55%, PPV/NPV respectively 85.71% and ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionInterferon gamma (IFN-?) release assays, such as QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test (QFT-G) and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) are designed to detect M. tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. Recognition of unusual IFN-? measurements may help indicate inaccurate results.MethodsWe examined QFT-G and QFT-GIT results from subjects who had two or more tests completed. We classified unusual IFN-? measurements as: 1) High Nil Concentration (HNC) when IFN-? concentration in plasma from unstimulated blood exceeded 0.7 IU/mL; 2) Low Mitogen Response (LMR) when Mitogen Response was <0.5 IU/mL; 3) Very Low Mitogen Response (VLMR) when Mitogen Response was ?-0.5 IU/mL; and 4) Very Low Antigen Response (VLAR) when the response to a Mtb antigen was ?-0.35 IU/mL and ?-0.5 times the IFN-? concentration in plasma from unstimulated blood.ResultsAmong 5,309 results from 1,728 subjects, HNC occurred in 234 (4.4%) tests for 162 subjects, LMR in 108 (2.0%) tests for 85 subjects, VLMR in 22 (0.4%) tests for 21 subjects, and VLAR in 41 (0.8%) tests for 39 subjects. QFT-GIT had fewer HNC, VLMR, and VLAR (p?=?0.042, 0.004, and 0.067 respectively); QFT-G had fewer LMR (p?=?0.005). Twenty-four (51.6%) of 47 subjects with positive results and HNC were negative or indeterminate by all other tests. Thirteen (61.9%) of 21 subjects with positive results and LMR were negative or indeterminate by all other tests.ConclusionUnusual IFN-? measurements including HNC, LMR, VLMR, and VLAR were encountered in small numbers, and in most instances were not seen on simultaneously or subsequently performed tests. To avoid erroneous diagnosis of Mtb infection, IGRAs with unusual IFN-? measurements should be repeated with another blood sample and interpreted with caution if they recur.
| S-EPMC3110578 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There is currently no 'gold standard' for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and both the tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are used for diagnosis; the latter have a higher sensitivity than tuberculin skin tests for diagnosis of LTBI in HIV-infected individuals with lower CD4 counts. No evidence base exists for selection of IGRA methodology to identify LTBI among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the UK. We prospectively evaluated two commercially available IGRA methods (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube [QFG] and T-SPOT.TB) for testing LTBI among HIV-infected patients potentially nosocomially exposed to an HIV-infected patient with 'smear-positive' pulmonary tuberculosis. Among the exposed patients median CD4 count was 550 cells/µL; 105 (90%) of 117 were receiving antiretroviral therapy, of who 104 (99%) had an undetectable plasma HIV load. IGRAs were positive in 12 patients (10.3%); QFG positive in 11 (9.4%) and T-SPOT.TB positive in six (5.1%); both IGRAs were positive in five patients (4.3%). There was one indeterminate QFG and one borderline T-SPOT.TB result. Concordance between the two IGRAs was moderate (? = 0.56, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.85). IGRAs were positive in only 4 (29%) of 14 patients with previous culture-proven tuberculosis. No patient developed tuberculosis during 20 months of follow-up.
| S-EPMC4107858 | biostudies-other
Project description:QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new-generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay which has two antigen-coated tubes called TB1, which contains long peptides derived from ESAT-6 and CFP-10, and TB2, which contains the same components as TB1 and additional short peptides which potentially stimulate CD8+ T cells through the presentation of major histocompatibility complex class I. This is the first study to compare QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT for use in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among immunocompromised patients in the Republic of Korea. Among 317 consecutive patients who underwent screening for LTBI before solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor treatment, LTBI was identified in 92 (29.0%) and 88 (27.8%) patients by QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, respectively. The rate of concordance between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus was 93.7% (? value, 0.860), and the indeterminate rate (3.2%) was similar between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. Of 20 (6.3%) samples with discordant results, 11 (55.0%) and 7 (35.0%) were positive by QFT-GIT alone and QFT-Plus alone, respectively, and 2 (15.0%) were indeterminate by each assay. The interferon gamma level in samples with discordant results ranged from 0.39 to 1.10 IU/ml, except for one sample, in which the gamma interferon level was 2.97 IU/ml only in TB2. Conclusively, there was a high degree of agreement between the results of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus for the screening of immunocompromised patients for LTBI. The reactivity in TB2 contributed substantially to the difference between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, particularly in solid organ transplant candidates. The significance of the discrete responses in TB1 and TB2 of QFT-Plus needs to be explored further by means of an immunological and clinical approach in different patient groups and clinical settings.
| S-EPMC6204680 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe investigated changes in the interferon-γ levels before and after treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assays. The objective was to assess whether QFT-Plus could serve as a biomarker of LTBI treatment response.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 44 individuals whose baseline QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus showed positive results at a tertiary referral center in South Korea between March 2017 and March 2018. The results of the QFT-Plus assay were defined as positive if either or both of the antigen tubes (TB1 and/or TB2) were positive. After LTBI treatment, both tests were repeated.ResultsThe mean age of the participants was 47.6 years. The QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays revealed positive results in 42/44 (95.5%) and 41/44 (93.2%) participants after LTBI treatment, showing overall agreement of 93.2%, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.37 (fair agreement). The differences between pre- and post-LTBI treatment interferon-γ levels were measured using the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays. No significant differences were noted among the 3 values: the median difference in interferon-γ value with QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus TB1, and QFT-Plus TB2 was 0.211 IU/mL (IQR, -0.337-3.347), 0.025 IU/mL (IQR, -0.338-1.368), and 0.180 IU/mL (IQR, -0.490-2.278), respectively (P = 0.401).ConclusionThe change in interferon-γ levels before and after LTBI treatment measured using the QFT-Plus assay showed a similar trend to that of the QFT-GIT assay. Considering that the QFT-GIT assay is not a useful biomarker of LTBI treatment response, QFT-Plus also appears not to be useful for this purpose.
| S-EPMC7297367 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RationaleAlthough IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) are widely used to screen for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in high-income countries, published data on repeatability are limited.ObjectivesTo determine IGRA repeatability.MethodsThe study population included consecutive patients referred to The Methodist Hospital (Houston, TX) between August 1, 2010 and July 31, 2011 for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection screening with an IGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia). We performed multiple IGRA tests using leftover stimulated plasma according to a prospectively formulated quality control protocol. We analyzed agreement in interpretation of test results classified according to manufacturer-recommended criteria and repeatability of quantitative TB response.Measurements and main resultsDuring the study period, 1,086 test results were obtained from 543 subjects. Per the manufacturer's cut-point, the result of the second test was discordant from that of the first in 28 (8%) of 366 patients with valid test results, including 13 with an initial negative result and 15 with an initial positive result. Although agreement between repeat test results was high (κ = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.90), the normal expected range of within-subject variability in TB response on retesting included differences of ± 0.60 IU/ml for all individuals (coefficient of variation, 14%), and ± 0.24 IU/ml (coefficient of variation, 27%) for individuals whose initial TB response was between 0.25 and 0.80 IU/ml.ConclusionsThere is substantial variability in TB response when IGRAs are repeated using the same patient sample. IGRA results should be interpreted cautiously when TB response is near interpretation cut-points.
| S-EPMC3570654 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEarly secretory antigenic target-6 (ESAT-6) is an immunodominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) antigen included in novel vaccines against tuberculosis (TB) and in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs). Therefore, the availability of an ESAT-6-free IGRA is essential to determine M.tb infection status following vaccination with ESAT-6-containing vaccines. We aimed to qualify a recently developed ESAT-6-free IGRA and to assess its diagnostic performance in comparison to QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT).MethodsParticipants with different levels of M.tb exposure and TB disease were enrolled to determine the ESAT-6-free IGRA cutoff, test assay performance in independent cohorts compared to standard QFT, and perform a technical qualification of antigen-coated blood collection tubes.ResultsESAT-6-free IGRA antigen recognition was evaluated in QFT-positive and QFT-negative South African adolescents. The ESAT-6-free IGRA cutoff was established at 0.61 IU/mL, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis in M.tb-unexposed controls and microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB patients. In an independent cohort of healthy adolescents, levels of IFN-γ released in QFT and ESAT-6-free IGRA were highly correlated (P < .0001, r = 0.83) and yielded comparable positivity rates, 41.5% and 43.5%, respectively, with 91% concordance between the tests (kappa = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.90; McNemar test P = .48). ESAT-6-free IGRA blood collection tubes had acceptable lot-to-lot variability, precision, and stability.ConclusionsThe novel ESAT-6-free IGRA had diagnostic accuracy comparable to QFT and is suitable for use in clinical trials to assess efficacy of candidate TB vaccines to prevent established M.tb infection.
| S-EPMC6821223 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection by measuring release of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) when T-cells (in heparinized whole blood) are stimulated with specific Mtb antigens. The amount of IFN-γ is determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Automation of the ELISA method may reduce variability. To assess the impact of ELISA automation, we compared QFT-GIT results and variability when ELISAs were performed manually and with automation.MethodsBlood was collected into two sets of QFT-GIT tubes and processed at the same time. For each set, IFN-γ was measured in automated and manual ELISAs. Variability in interpretations and IFN-γ measurements was assessed between automated (A1 vs. A2) and manual (M1 vs. M2) ELISAs. Variability in IFN-γ measurements was also assessed on separate groups stratified by the mean of the four ELISAs.ResultsSubjects (N = 146) had two automated and two manual ELISAs completed. Overall, interpretations were discordant for 16 (11%) subjects. Excluding one subject with indeterminate results, 7 (4.8%) subjects had discordant automated interpretations and 10 (6.9%) subjects had discordant manual interpretations (p = 0.17). Quantitative variability was not uniform; within-subject variability was greater with higher IFN-γ measurements and with manual ELISAs. For subjects with mean TB Responses ±0.25 IU/mL of the 0.35 IU/mL cutoff, the within-subject standard deviation for two manual tests was 0.27 (CI95 = 0.22-0.37) IU/mL vs. 0.09 (CI95 = 0.07-0.12) IU/mL for two automated tests.ConclusionQFT-GIT ELISA automation may reduce variability near the test cutoff. Methodological differences should be considered when interpreting and using IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs).
| S-EPMC3900587 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImmunologic tests such as the tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) are designed to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, both latent M. tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and infection manifesting as active tuberculosis disease (TB). These tests need high specificity to minimize unnecessary treatment and high sensitivity to allow maximum detection and prevention of TB.MethodsEstimate QFT-GIT specificity, compare QFT-GIT and TST results, and assess factor associations with test discordance among U.S. Navy recruits.ResultsAmong 792 subjects with completed TST and QFT-GIT, 42(5.3%) had TST indurations ≥10mm, 23(2.9%) had indurations ≥15mm, 14(1.8%) had positive QFT-GIT results, and 5(0.6%) had indeterminate QFT-GITs. Of 787 subjects with completed TST and determinate QFT-GIT, 510(64.8%) were at low-risk for infection, 277(35.2%) were at increased risk, and none had TB. Among 510 subjects at low-risk (presumed not infected), estimated TST specificity using a 15mm cutoff, 99.0% (95%CI: 98.2-99.9%), and QFT-GIT specificity, 98.8% (95%CI: 97.9-99.8%), were not significantly different (p>0.99). Most discordance was among recruits at increased risk of infection, and most was TST-positive but QFT-GIT-negative discordance. Of 18 recruits with TST ≥15mm but QFT-GIT negative discordance, 14(78%) were at increased risk. TB prevalence in country of birth was the strongest predictor of positive TST results, positive QFT-GIT results, and TST-positive but QFT-GIT-negative discordance. Reactivity to M. avium purified protein derivative (PPD) was associated with positive TST results and with TST-positive but QFT-GIT-negative discordance using a 10 mm cutoff, but not using a 15 mm cutoff or with QFT-GIT results.ConclusionsM. tuberculosis infection prevalence was low, with the vast majority of infection occurring in recruits with recognizable risks. QFT-GIT and TST specificities were high and not significantly different. Negative QFT-GIT results among subjects with TST induration ≥15 mm who were born in countries with high TB prevalence, raise concerns.
| S-EPMC5435309 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RationaleEach year 1 million persons acquire permanent U.S. residency visas after tuberculosis (TB) screening. Most applicants undergo a 2-stage screening with tuberculin skin test (TST) followed by CXR only if TST-positive at > 5 mm. Due to cross reaction with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), TST may yield false positive results in BCG-vaccinated persons. Interferon gamma release assays exclude antigens found in BCG. In Vietnam, like most high TB-prevalence countries, there is universal BCG vaccination at birth.Objectives1. Compare the sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Assay (QFT) and TST for culture-positive pulmonary TB. 2. Compare the age-specific and overall prevalence of positive TST and QFT among applicants with normal and abnormal CXR.MethodsWe obtained TST and QFT results on 996 applicants with abnormal CXR, of whom 132 had TB, and 479 with normal CXR.ResultsThe sensitivity for tuberculosis was 86.4% for QFT; 89.4%, 81.1%, and 52.3% for TST at 5, 10, and 15 mm. The estimated prevalence of positive results at age 15-19 years was 22% and 42% for QFT and TST at 10 mm, respectively. The prevalence increased thereafter by 0.7% year of age for TST and 2.1% for QFT, the latter being more consistent with the increase in TB among applicants.ConclusionsDuring 2-stage screening, QFT is as sensitive as TST in detecting TB with fewer requiring CXR and being diagnosed with LTBI. These data support the use of QFT over TST in this population.
| S-EPMC3868593 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) is a viable alternative to the tuberculin skin test (TST) for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. However, within-subject variability may limit test utility. To assess variability, we compared results from the same subjects when QFT-GIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed in different laboratories.MethodsSubjects were recruited at two sites and blood was tested in three labs. Two labs used the same type of automated ELISA workstation, 8-point calibration curves, and electronic data transfer. The third lab used a different automated ELISA workstation, 4-point calibration curves, and manual data entry. Variability was assessed by interpretation agreement and comparison of interferon-? (IFN-?) measurements. Data for subjects with discordant interpretations or discrepancies in TB Response >0.05 IU/mL were verified or corrected, and variability was reassessed using a reconciled dataset.ResultsNinety-seven subjects had results from three labs. Eleven (11.3%) had discordant interpretations and 72 (74.2%) had discrepancies >0.05 IU/mL using unreconciled results. After correction of manual data entry errors for 9 subjects, and exclusion of 6 subjects due to methodological errors, 7 (7.7%) subjects were discordant. Of these, 6 (85.7%) had all TB Responses within 0.25 IU/mL of the manufacturer's recommended cutoff. Non-uniform error of measurement was observed, with greater variation in higher IFN-? measurements. Within-subject standard deviation for TB Response was as high as 0.16 IU/mL, and limits of agreement ranged from -0.46 to 0.43 IU/mL for subjects with mean TB Response within 0.25 IU/mL of the cutoff.ConclusionGreater interlaboratory variability was associated with manual data entry and higher IFN-? measurements. Manual data entry should be avoided. Because variability in measuring TB Response may affect interpretation, especially near the cutoff, consideration should be given to developing a range of values near the cutoff to be interpreted as "borderline," rather than negative or positive.
| S-EPMC3435391 | biostudies-literature