Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Sensitive Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Existing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methods lack the sensitivity needed for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) following therapy. We developed a test for tracking hundreds of patient-specific mutations to detect MRD with a 1,000-fold lower error rate than conventional sequencing. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:We compared the sensitivity of our approach to digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in a dilution series, then retrospectively identified two cohorts of patients who had undergone prospective plasma sampling and clinical data collection: 16 patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) sampled within 6 months following metastatic diagnosis and 142 patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer who received curative-intent treatment with most sampled at surgery and 1 year postoperative. We performed whole-exome sequencing of tumors and designed individualized MRD tests, which we applied to serial cfDNA samples. RESULTS:Our approach was 100-fold more sensitive than ddPCR when tracking 488 mutations, but most patients had fewer identifiable tumor mutations to track in cfDNA (median = 57; range = 2-346). Clinical sensitivity was 81% (n = 13/16) in newly diagnosed MBC, 23% (n = 7/30) at postoperative and 19% (n = 6/32) at 1 year in early-stage disease, and highest in patients with the most tumor mutations available to track. MRD detection at 1 year was strongly associated with distant recurrence [HR = 20.8; 95% confidence interval, 7.3-58.9]. Median lead time from first positive sample to recurrence was 18.9 months (range = 3.4-39.2 months). CONCLUSIONS:Tracking large numbers of individualized tumor mutations in cfDNA can improve MRD detection, but its sensitivity is driven by the number of tumor mutations available to track.

SUBMITTER: Parsons HA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7654718 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Sensitive Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Parsons Heather A HA   Rhoades Justin J   Reed Sarah C SC   Gydush Gregory G   Ram Priyanka P   Exman Pedro P   Xiong Kan K   Lo Christopher C CC   Li Tianyu T   Fleharty Mark M   Kirkner Gregory J GJ   Rotem Denisse D   Cohen Ofir O   Yu Fangyan F   Fitarelli-Kiehl Mariana M   Leong Ka Wai KW   Hughes Melissa E ME   Rosenberg Shoshana M SM   Collins Laura C LC   Miller Kathy D KD   Blumenstiel Brendan B   Trippa Lorenzo L   Cibulskis Carrie C   Neuberg Donna S DS   DeFelice Matthew M   Freeman Samuel S SS   Lennon Niall J NJ   Wagle Nikhil N   Ha Gavin G   Stover Daniel G DG   Choudhury Atish D AD   Getz Gad G   Winer Eric P EP   Meyerson Matthew M   Lin Nancy U NU   Krop Ian I   Love J Christopher JC   Makrigiorgos G Mike GM   Partridge Ann H AH   Mayer Erica L EL   Golub Todd R TR   Adalsteinsson Viktor A VA  

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20200313 11


<h4>Purpose</h4>Existing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methods lack the sensitivity needed for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) following therapy. We developed a test for tracking hundreds of patient-specific mutations to detect MRD with a 1,000-fold lower error rate than conventional sequencing.<h4>Experimental design</h4>We compared the sensitivity of our approach to digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in a dilution series, then retrospectively identified two cohorts of patients who had undergone pros  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9870904 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5629369 | biostudies-literature
2011-04-20 | GSE28497 | GEO
| S-EPMC10870111 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6966766 | biostudies-literature
| S-BSST713 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8853615 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9297781 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8543468 | biostudies-literature
| 2727212 | ecrin-mdr-crc