Dataset Information

A comprehensive analysis of microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for asthma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

It is unclear whether microRNAs could be a potential diagnostic biomarker for asthma or not. The objective of this study is to figure out the diagnostic value of microRNAs in asthma.

Methods

Literature retrieval, screening of publications, specific data extraction, and quality evaluation were conducted according to the standard criteria. Stata 14.0 software was used to analyze the diagnostic value of microRNA for asthma, including the combined sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), the area under the curve (AUC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).

Results

A total of 72 studies, containing 4143 cases and 2188 controls, were included for this comprehensive analysis. None of the included publications were rated low in quality. We summarized that, compared with controls, more than 100 miRNAs were reported differently expressed in asthma, although the expression trends were inconsistent. Besides, there were five studies among these 72 articles that applied the diagnostic evaluation of microRNAs in asthma. We found that the pooled Sen, Spe, and AUC for the combination of miR-185-5p, miR-155, let-7a, miR-21, miR-320a, miR-1246, miR-144-5p, and miR-1165-3p in asthma were 0.87 (95%CI: 0.72-0.95), 0.84 (95%CI: 0.74-0.91), and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.89-0.94) individually, and the PLR, NLR, and DOR were 5.5 (95%CI: 3.1-9.7), 0.15 (95%CI: 0.07-0.36), and 35 (95%CI: 10-127) in asthma, respectively. In terms of subgroup analyses, we found that the Sen for these combination miRNAs from serum was higher than that in plasma, while the Spe in plasma worked better than that in serum. Furthermore, compared with children, the combination of above miRNAs from adults had higher Spe and similar Sen.

Conclusions

From our analysis, the combination of miR-185-5p, miR-155, let-7a, miR-21, miR-320a, miR-1246, miR-144-5p, and miR-1165-3p from peripheral blood could potentially act as a diagnostic biomarker for asthma.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

SUBMITTER: Xu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7768876 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comprehensive analysis of microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for asthma.

Xu Li L Yi Minhan M Tan Yun Y Yi Zixun Z Zhang Yuan Y

Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease 20200101

<h4>Background</h4>It is unclear whether microRNAs could be a potential diagnostic biomarker for asthma or not. The objective of this study is to figure out the diagnostic value of microRNAs in asthma.<h4>Methods</h4>Literature retrieval, screening of publications, specific data extraction, and quality evaluation were conducted according to the standard criteria. Stata 14.0 software was used to analyze the diagnostic value of microRNA for asthma, including the combined sensitivity (Sen), specifi ...[more]

PMID: 33357010

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common diabetic microvascular complication and a major cause of acquired vision loss. Finding effective biomarkers for the early identification and diagnosis of DR is crucial. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis of DR via a meta-analysis of previously published diagnostic studies. This study has been registered on the PROSPERO website, with the number CRD42022323238.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China Wanfang database, and China Knowledge Network database to identify relevant articles published from the time of database creation to April 10, 2022. Stata 14.0 software was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the accuracy of miRNAs in the diagnosis of DR. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using Cochran-Q test and I2 statistic for quantitative analysis. The random-effect model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and regression analysis were also performed to determine the potential sources of heterogeneity.ResultsWe included 25 articles detailing 52 studies with 1987 patients with DR and 1771 non-DR controls. The findings demonstrated overall sensitivity (0.82, 95% CI: 0.78 ~ 0.85), specificity (0.84, 95% CI: 0.81 ~ 0.86), PLR (5.0, 95% CI: 4.2 ~ 5.9), NLR (0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 ~ 0.26), and the area under the summary ROC curve (0.90, 95% CI: 0.87 ~ 0.92). Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis and found that panels of multiple miRNAs could enhance the pooled sensitivity (sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were 0.89, 0.87, and 0.94, respectively).ConclusionThe meta-analysis showed that miRNAs can be used as potential diagnostic markers for DR, with high accuracy of diagnoses observed with the detection of miRNAs in plasma and serum.

Project description:Backgrounds and Purpose: Currently, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are considered to be non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers in a broad range of tumors. Nevertheless, so far, miRNAs have not been fully applied to the clinic for routine screening in glioma patients. Thus, our goal is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs for gliomas via a meta-analysis. The present study is registered on the PROSPERO website, with the number CRD42020195883. Methods: Literature retrieval was implemented in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the established search strategy. We pooled the sensitivity, specificity, and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the included studies using the Stata 14.0 software. In addition, the heterogeneity between studies was assessed via the Q statistics and I 2 values calculated by a Chi-square test. A bivariate random effects model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. Specifically, for exploring the factors influencing the heterogeneity, we implemented subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Ultimately, a Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test was used to estimate the potential publication bias. Results: A total of 18 articles covering 24 studies were included, containing 2,170 glioma patients and 1,456 healthy participants. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.79-0.87), 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80-0.88), 5.3 (95%CI: 4.1-6.8), 0.19 (95%CI: 0.15-0.25), 27 (95%CI: 18-41), and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. Additionally, the findings revealed that serum miRNAs and miRNA panels presented superior diagnostic performance. Conclusion: Thus, circulating miRNAs have the potential to serve as diagnostic biomarkers for gliomas, but need to be verified via a large pool of prospective studies. Additionally, specific miRNAs still need to be elucidated in the diagnosis of a glioma, especially in the early screening stage. The findings may provide diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for the glioma population.

Dataset Information

A comprehensive analysis of microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for asthma.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A comprehensive analysis of microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for asthma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets