Dataset Information

Dysphagia and its impact on the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: institution-based cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Impaired swallowing is a primary medical concern in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Swallowing therapy and supportive care to relieve swallowing problems among HNC patients are recommended. However, no data shows the effect of dysphagia on the quality of life (QoL) among Ethiopian patients. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess swallowing function and its impact on QoL.

Results

The sample included 102 HNC patients who visited oncology clinics at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Majority were male (53.90%), employed (70.6%), single (57.80%), and completed some level of formal education (66.60%) with a mean age of 42.58 years (SD?±?14.08). More than half of the patients (69.6%) medical expenses were covered by the government. Most were suffering from advanced stage HNC (59.80%), squamous cell carcinoma (62.70%), and the most prevalent tumor location was nasopharynx (40.20%). The mean MDADI score was 53.29 (SD?±?15.85). Being female, low income, suffering from laryngeal cancer, advanced tumor, and undergoing a single modality therapy were crucial determinants of poor QoL related to swallowing problems. It is recommended to assess swallowing related QoL of patients using a validated tool and be included in treatment protocols.

SUBMITTER: Yifru TA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7791825 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Dysphagia and its impact on the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: institution-based cross-sectional study.

Yifru Tseganesh Asefa TA Kisa Sezer S Dinegde Negalign Getahun NG Atnafu Niguse Tadele NT

BMC research notes 20210107 1

<h4>Objective</h4>Impaired swallowing is a primary medical concern in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Swallowing therapy and supportive care to relieve swallowing problems among HNC patients are recommended. However, no data shows the effect of dysphagia on the quality of life (QoL) among Ethiopian patients. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess swallowing function and its impact on QoL.<h4>Results</h4>The sample included 102 HNC patients who visited oncology clinics at Tikur Anbessa S ...[more]

PMID: 33413623

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Cancer is a devastating disease and has detrimental effects on the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors and interferes with their treatment compliance. The aim of the study is to assess resilience and QoL among cancer survivors and to evaluate the important factors affecting their resilience and QoL, with respect to the Pakistani cultural context. METHOD AND ANALYSIS:A cross-sectional study will be conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. A minimum sample size of 250 head and neck cancers and 250 brain tumour survivors with 10% inflation for non-response rate will be required. The SD of QoL and resilience will range from 16.5 to 40.8 for head and neck cancer, and 12.7 to 34.1 for brain tumour, at 5% level of significance, with 2.5 precision. QoL will be assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 and resilience will be evaluated by Wagnild and Young's 14-item scale. Mean±SD will be reported for resilience and QoL scores. Unadjusted and adjusted β-coefficients, with 95% CI, will be reported by using multiple linear regression analysis. Correlation analysis will also be performed using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation coefficients. A p value of <0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:Ethical approval has been obtained from the Aga Khan University Pakistan's Ethical Review Committee. Written informed consent will be taken from the participants by trained research assistants. A trained psychologist will provide on-spot counselling to the participants and those identified with severe depression will be referred to a psychiatrist. The study materials will be kept under lock and key and the electronic data base will be password protected and will only be accessed by the research team. The study findings will be disseminated through publications conferences and workshops and research briefs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03466762).

Project description:BackgroundOrthodontic braces have become symbols of wealth and fashion accessories in some parts of the world. However, there is a scarcity of information about the effects of fashion braces on various aspects of quality of life. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the effects of fashion braces on oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL).MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out with data collection from a Google form questionnaire distributed in Saudi Arabia via various forms of social media over a period of 4 months. OHRQoL was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire. The fashion braces group included respondents who had braces installed for fashion purposes only. Therapeutic braces group included subjects who were wearing braces to treat any malocclusion problems. Control group included subjects who did not have any kind of braces. People who had previously completed orthodontic treatments were excluded from the study. The negative impacts were divided into seven domains and a total OHIP score was calculated. Statistical analyses and data illustration were performed with SPSS v25 (IBM, NY).ResultsA total of 1141 people voluntarily participated in the study. More than 60% of the participants were in the control group while 33.7% had conventional braces for therapeutic reasons and 3.4% had fashion braces. Sociodemographic distributions varied among the groups, with the majority of the fashion braces group having education below the university level and family incomes less than average. There were significant group differences in OHIP domains. Physical pain was the most frequently reported complaint by all subjects and was the highest in the therapeutic braces group. People with therapeutic braces reported significantly higher functional limitation and physical disability than the controls. Fashion braces group reported significantly lower psychological discomfort and disability, social disability and handicap compared to control groups.ConclusionsThe illustrated effects of fashion braces on OHRQoL suggest the need to study the role of social media and educate the public on the use of braces to minimize the negative effects experienced by individuals.

Project description:Background and aimsPostoperative voice change, difficulty of swallowing, throat pain, and neck pain are the most commonly complaint after thyroid surgery. However, little emphasis is given to the problem, especially a place where the surgical and anesthesia services' unmet need is highly observed, i.e., the problem gets little attention especially in the countries where the gaps of surgery and anesthesia services are observed. Hence, this study aims to determine the magnitude and associated factors of voice change and related complaints after thyroid surgery.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 151 patients who had had thyroid surgery from June 1 to December 30, 2021. Data were retrieved during the postoperative period after the patient regains consciousness.ResultOut of 151 participants, 98 (64.9%) patients complained of either voice change or difficulty of swallowing and neck pain after thyroid surgery within 24 hours. Majority (58.3%) of the participants aged more than 30 years with a mean age of 33.7 ± 8.3 years and females 102 (67.5%). Neck pain is the most (52.3%) complained suffering after thyroid surgery, followed by voice change 38.4% and difficulty in swallowing 37.7%. Difficulty in swallowing after thyroid surgery significantly associated with a patient who frequently experience intraoperative hypotension (AOR = 23.24, 95% CI 4.6-116.7, and p = 0.01), type of surgical procedure (total thyroidectomy) (AOR = 8.62, 95% CI 1.21-61.50, and p = 0.03), and larger ETT size (AOR = 4.92, 95% CI 1.34-18.01, and p = 0.02). Postoperative voice change is associated with larger endotracheal tube (AOR = 15.47, 95% CI 3.4-69.5, and p ≤ 0.001), surgery lasting more than 2 hours (AOR = 7.34, 95% CI 1.5-35.1, and p = 0.01), and intraoperative hypotension (AOR = 23.24, 95% CI 4.6-116.7, and p ≤ 0.001).ConclusionThe complaint of postthyroidectomy neck pain and throat discomfort is higher than 64.9%. Intraoperative hypotension, blood loss, higher ETT size utilization, and duration of surgical procedure are the identified possible risk factors and have to be minimized as much as possible. Patient reassurance has to be considered during the postoperative time.

Project description:To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region.We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic three-phase cluster sampling and stratified by sex and age, based on official estimates. Quality of life data were collected using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) along with socioeconomic, demographic, and health perception data. Utility scores were calculated using the Brazilian version of the EQ-5D-3L. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multivariate Tobit regression model with correction for complex sampling was performed to identify the variables that influence utility levels.A total of 4001 participants were included. The average utility score was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881-0.890) with significant differences according to living area (the capital (0.882 ± 0.144) or inner cities (0.908 ± 0.122; p < 0.001)). The dimension for which the highest proportion of people reported moderate to severe problems was pain/discomfort (39%), followed by anxiety/depression (18%). Men had a higher quality of life than women (β = 0.041, p < 0.001). Not working was a factor that increased quality of life compared with being formally employed (β = 0.031, p = 0.037). The poorest people had a lower quality of life than the richest people (β = -0.118, p < 0.001). Better health perceptions increased utility scores (p < 0.001), while being separated decreased the scores (β = -0.052, p = 0.001).Health-related quality of life in the Manaus Metropolitan Region was high, as expected for the general population, and was higher among individuals who lived in the inner cities, men and those in higher social classes. Gender discrepancies and differences in quality of life between the capital and inner cities should be further investigated.

Dataset Information

Dysphagia and its impact on the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: institution-based cross-sectional study.

Objective

Results

Publications

Dysphagia and its impact on the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: institution-based cross-sectional study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets