Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare long-term effects of high-volume surgery at a single-center to multicenter use when using a mesh-capturing device for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair.Methods
Five years after surgery 101 (88%) at the single center were compared with 164 (81.2%) in the multicenter trial. Outcome measurements included clinical examination, prolapse-specific symptom questionnaires [Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-short form (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)] and pain estimation by VAS (0-10).Results
Optimal apical segment outcome was 95% in the single- compared to 83.3% in the multicenter study (p?ConclusionsDespite the high objective and subjective long-term effectiveness of the procedure in both regular use, and at a high-volume center, centralizing the use of a standardized capturing-device guided transvaginal mesh for POP repair reduced secondary interventions by more than half.
SUBMITTER: Falconer C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7854402 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Falconer Christian C Altman Daniel D Poutakidis Georgios G Rahkola-Soisalo Päivi P Mikkola Tomi T Morcos Edward E
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 20200911 1
<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to compare long-term effects of high-volume surgery at a single-center to multicenter use when using a mesh-capturing device for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair.<h4>Methods</h4>Five years after surgery 101 (88%) at the single center were compared with 164 (81.2%) in the multicenter trial. Outcome measurements included clinical examination, prolapse-specific symptom questionnaires [Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Quest ...[more]