Dataset Information

The benefits of etoposide capsules as maintenance therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a prospective two-stage, two-center study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Due to the high incidence and mortality of lung cancer, and etoposide is the standard first-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etoposide capsules at different doses as maintenance therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who show a response to etoposide plus platinum.

Methods

The study was divided into two stages: stage I, a single-center, one-arm prospective study, and stage II, a multicenter, controlled non-randomized prospective study (patients were chosen from ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02179528). All patients received six cycles of etoposide plus platinum. Patients who were evaluated as complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) entered the maintenance treatment (MT) (etoposide capsule, once a day for 20 days, every 28 days as a cycle, until disease progression). In stage I, the dose of etoposide was 25 mg; in stage II, patients were non-randomized into etoposide capsule (25 mg/50 mg) and observation groups. In this study, the primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety; the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.

Results

Ninety-two patients were enrolled. In stage I, the median PFS was 6.700 months (95% CI: 6.408-6.992). In stage II, the median PFS of the MT group was better than that in the NMT group (8.930 vs. 5.900 months, P=0.002). In the pooled analysis, the overall median PFS of the MT group was better than that of the NMT group (7.870 vs. 5.900 months, P=0.003). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the groups (15.030 vs. 14.330 months, P=0.813). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maintenance therapy was an independent protective factor for PFS in patients with ES-SCLC.

Conclusions

Etoposide capsules as maintenance therapy significantly prolonged the PFS of patients with ES-SCLC who responded to etoposide plus platinum, with acceptable tolerability.

SUBMITTER: Zhang C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7867853 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The benefits of etoposide capsules as maintenance therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a prospective two-stage, two-center study.

Zhang Cuicui C Duan Jianchun J He Zhen Z Yang Li L Yang Sen S Zhang Zhe Z Liu Yang Y Wan Rui R Lin Lin L Wu Xuan X Wang Wei W Wang Qiming Q Wang Jie J

Journal of thoracic disease 20210101 1

<h4>Background</h4>Due to the high incidence and mortality of lung cancer, and etoposide is the standard first-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etoposide capsules at different doses as maintenance therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who show a response to etoposide plus platinum.<h4>Methods</h4>The study was divided into two stages: stage I, a single-center, one-arm prospective study, and stage II, a multi ...[more]

PMID: 33569214

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have a particularly poor prognosis. And the treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC are limited. Thus, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus etoposide capsules as the third- or further-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients.MethodsPatients with ES-SCLC who experienced disease progression following 2 to 3 previous therapies from 11 medical centers in China were enrolled to receive apatinib (250 mg/d, continuously) and etoposide capsules (50 mg/d, on day 1-21, per 28 days). The treatment continued until disease progression, treatment intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsFifty-six patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC were enrolled from January 2018 to February 2020 and 53 of them were eventually included in the evaluation population. The median follow-up was 9.8 months. At the data cut-off time (March 5, 2020), 39 patients (74%) had died and 44 (83%) had progressed. The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.9) and the median OS was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.6-6.4). No complete responses were seen. Eleven patients (21%) showed a best response of partial response and 37 (70%) patients achieved stable disease. The ORR was 20.8% (11/53), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.6% (48/53). The 6-month OS rate was 40.1% (95% CI, 26.2-54). After 12 months, the OS rate was 18.4% (95% CI, 4.7-32.1). Possible treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events included leukopenia [8 (15.1%)], neutropenia [7 (13.2%)], anemia [4 (7.4%)], and hand-foot syndrome [2 (3.8%)]. During the study, no mortality occurred as a consequence of treatment.ConclusionsApatinib combined with etoposide capsules exhibits efficacy and has an acceptable safety profile. It could be used as a later-line treatment for ES-SCLC patients who have been heavily pretreated with standard therapies. Further exploration of apatinib combined with etoposide capsules in phase III trials is warranted.

Project description:BackgroundNo novel chemotherapeutic combinations have demonstrated superior efficacy to etoposide/cisplatin (EP), a standard treatment regimen for extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma (ES-SCLC) over the past decade. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of belotecan/cisplatin (BP) and EP regimens in chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC.MethodsWe conducted a multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase III clinical study. A total of 157 patients were recruited at 14 centers with 147 patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomized to either BP (n = 71) or EP (n = 76) treatment arms. A non-inferior response rate (RR) in the BP arm, analyzed by intent-to-treat analysis according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 criteria, was used as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsIn the BP arm, one patient had a complete response, 41 had a partial response (PR), and 17 had stable disease (SD). In the EP arm, 35 patients had PR and 28 had SD. The RR in the BP arm was non-inferior to the EP regimen in patients with ES-SCLC (BP: 59.2 %, EP: 46.1 %, difference: 13.1 %, 90 % two-sided confidence interval: -0.3-26.5, meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion of -15.0 %). No significant differences in OS or PFS were observed between the treatment arms. Hematologic toxicities, including grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia, were significantly more prevalent in the BP arm than the EP arm.ConclusionsThe RR to the BP regimen was non-inferior to the EP regimen in chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC. Hematologic toxicities were significantly more prevalent in the BP group, indicating that BP should be used with care, particularly in patients with a poor performance status. Further studies assessing PFS and OS are required to validate the superiority of the BP regimen.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00826644 . Date of Registration: January 21, 2009.

Project description:BackgroundThe latest published CASPIAN trial demonstrated that adding durvalumab to etoposide and platinum (EP) improved survival dramatically for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Considering the high cost of durvalumab, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab plus EP (DEP) in the first-line setting for treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC from the U.S. payer perspective.Materials and methodsWe developed a three-state Markov model to simulate the disease course and source consumption of ES-SCLC over a lifetime horizon. Pseudo-individual patient-level data were generated from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves. Direct medical costs, including drug and administration costs, disease management and adverse events treatment fees, best supportive care and terminal care costs were obtained from sources including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and relevant literature. Health state utility values were derived from published literature. Main outcomes considered were total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). All costs were adjusted for inflation to reflect 2019 U.S. dollars. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set as $150,000/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore the uncertainty of model assumptions.ResultsCompared with EP, DEP was projected to increase life expectancy by 0.86 LYs (1.73 vs. 0.87) and 0.44 QALYs (0.93 vs. 0.49). The incremental treatment cost was $95,907, and the corresponding ICER was $216,953/QALY. The result was most sensitive to the variation of durvalumab acquisition cost. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of DEP over EP regimen to be cost-effective was 9.4% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. In the case of reducing the price of durvalumab by 30.7%, DEP was more cost-effective than EP.ConclusionFrom the perspective of the U.S. payer, adding durvalumab to EP is estimated to be not cost-effective compared with EP alone for patients with untreated ES-SCLC.Implications for practiceThe information provided by this analysis serves as a reference for decision makers. Lowering the price of durvalumab would be a potential measure to improve the economics of durvalumab plus etoposide and platinum (DEP), and the inclusion of durvalumab in the Medicare pharmacopeia could make DEP more economically available. These results may also guide physicians and patients to choose the most economically feasible treatment.

Dataset Information

The benefits of etoposide capsules as maintenance therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a prospective two-stage, two-center study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The benefits of etoposide capsules as maintenance therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a prospective two-stage, two-center study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets