Dataset Information

Cumulative incidence regression for dynamic treatment regimens.

ABSTRACT: Recently dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) have drawn considerable attention, as an effective tool for personalizing medicine. Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) are often used to gather data for making inference on DTRs. In this article, we focus on regression analysis of DTRs from a two-stage SMART for competing risk outcomes based on cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Even though there are extensive works on the regression problem for DTRs, no research has been done on modeling the CIF for SMART trials. We extend existing CIF regression models to handle covariate effects for DTRs. Asymptotic properties are established for our proposed estimators. The models can be implemented using existing software by an augmented-data approximation. We show the improvement provided by our proposed methods by simulation and illustrate its practical utility through an analysis of a SMART neuroblastoma study, where disease progression cannot be observed after death.

SUBMITTER: Chen LW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7868058 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cumulative incidence regression for dynamic treatment regimens.

Chen Ling-Wan LW Yavuz Idil I Cheng Yu Y Wahed Abdus S AS

Biostatistics (Oxford, England) 20200401 2

Recently dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) have drawn considerable attention, as an effective tool for personalizing medicine. Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) are often used to gather data for making inference on DTRs. In this article, we focus on regression analysis of DTRs from a two-stage SMART for competing risk outcomes based on cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Even though there are extensive works on the regression problem for DTRs, no research has been done ...[more]

PMID: 30371745

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) formalise the multi-stage and dynamic decision problems that clinicians often face when treating chronic or progressive medical conditions. Compared to randomised controlled trials, using observational data to optimise DTRs may allow a wider range of treatments to be evaluated at a lower cost. This review aimed to provide an overview of how DTRs are optimised with observational data in practice.MethodsUsing the PubMed database, a scoping review of studies in which DTRs were optimised using observational data was performed in October 2020. Data extracted from eligible articles included target medical condition, source and type of data, statistical methods, and translational relevance of the included studies.ResultsFrom 209 PubMed abstracts, 37 full-text articles were identified, and a further 26 were screened from the reference lists, totalling 63 articles for inclusion in a narrative data synthesis. Observational DTR models are a recent development and their application has been concentrated in a few medical areas, primarily HIV/AIDS (27, 43%), followed by cancer (8, 13%), and diabetes (6, 10%). There was substantial variation in the scope, intent, complexity, and quality between the included studies. Statistical methods that were used included inverse-probability weighting (26, 41%), the parametric G-formula (16, 25%), Q-learning (10, 16%), G-estimation (4, 6%), targeted maximum likelihood/minimum loss-based estimation (4, 6%), regret regression (3, 5%), and other less common approaches (10, 16%). Notably, studies that were primarily intended to address real-world clinical questions (18, 29%) tended to use inverse-probability weighting and the parametric G-formula, relatively well-established methods, along with a large amount of data. Studies focused on methodological developments (45, 71%) tended to be more complicated and included a demonstrative real-world application only.ConclusionsAs chronic and progressive conditions become more common, the need will grow for personalised treatments and methods to estimate the effects of DTRs. Observational DTR studies will be necessary, but so far their use to inform clinical practice has been limited. Focusing on simple DTRs, collecting large and rich clinical datasets, and fostering tight partnerships between content experts and data analysts may result in more clinically relevant observational DTR studies.

Dataset Information

Cumulative incidence regression for dynamic treatment regimens.

Publications

Cumulative incidence regression for dynamic treatment regimens.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets