Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection.


ABSTRACT: Industrial robots have different capabilities and specifications according to the required applications. It is becoming difficult to select a suitable robot for specific applications and requirements due to the availability of several types with different specifications of robots in the market. Best-worst method is a useful, highly consistent and reliable method to derive weights of criteria and it is worthy to integrate it with the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method that is more applicable and needs fewer number of calculations as compared to other methods. An example is presented to show the validity and usability of the proposed methodology. Comparison of ranking results matches with the well-known distance-based approach, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods showing the robustness of the best-worst EDAS hybrid method. Sensitivity analysis performed using eighty to one ratio shows that the proposed hybrid MCDM methodology is more stable and reliable.

SUBMITTER: Rashid T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7872252 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection.

Rashid Tabasam T   Ali Asif A   Chu Yu-Ming YM  

PloS one 20210209 2


Industrial robots have different capabilities and specifications according to the required applications. It is becoming difficult to select a suitable robot for specific applications and requirements due to the availability of several types with different specifications of robots in the market. Best-worst method is a useful, highly consistent and reliable method to derive weights of criteria and it is worthy to integrate it with the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) metho  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8675764 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10054698 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7652298 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9740807 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7703959 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7251540 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9250504 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8917154 | biostudies-literature
2021-12-10 | GSE168410 | GEO
| S-EPMC7664417 | biostudies-literature